IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eur/ejesjr/198.html

Management of Business Processes in Industrial Enterprises from Bulgaria Along the Lines of Balanced Scorecard and QPR Process Designer – Practical Conclusions

Author

Listed:
  • Petia Slavova

    (UNWE)

Abstract

Processes generate results that the company provides to its customers. Customers outcomes and processes are connected in dependable interaction. The capacity of the company to provide results that customers expect, largely depends on how well managers or business analysts design and manage processes. A key factor to ensure sustainable achievement of the organization's business process management in industrial enterprises from Bulgaria, which inevitably requires continuous measurement of their effectiveness. Ideally, the measurement must be linked to high company goals, to ensure that the processes are oriented towards these goals and assessed according to their contribution to achieving them. On the other side, measurements should be used to assess the performance of individual employees involved in the process. In other words, the high efficiency of the steps (taken as synonymous with the activities in the project context and modeling terminology using software tools) of processes should be rewarded. In a time when resources are more intangible, tangible shift as a tool for value creation, financial analysis of business becomes increasingly insufficient for the establishment of adequate assessment and prognosis. The new business reality provokes appearance of new methodologies to improve the management of business processes, and measuring and managing organizational performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Petia Slavova, 2020. "Management of Business Processes in Industrial Enterprises from Bulgaria Along the Lines of Balanced Scorecard and QPR Process Designer – Practical Conclusions," European Journal of Economics and Business Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 6(2), pages 54-63, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:eur:ejesjr:198
    DOI: 10.26417/ejms.v1i2.p408-414
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mentisia.org/files/articles/ejes_v6_i2_20/Petia.html
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26417/ejms.v1i2.p408-414?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Weerawardena, Jay & McDonald, Robert E. & Mort, Gillian Sullivan, 2010. "Sustainability of nonprofit organizations: An empirical investigation," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 346-356, October.
    2. Kelly E. Proulx & Mark A. Hager & Kimberly C. Klein, 2014. "Models of collaboration between nonprofit organizations," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 63(6), pages 746-765, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:eur:ejmejr:235 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Won-Seok Bang & Ko Hee Yoon & Kuk Hoan Wee & Binitha Chowdary Bandi & Sun Hwa Kim & Jung-Yoon Kim & Dong-Hwan Cho & N. S. Reddy, 2025. "Beyond regression: an ANN approach for exploring social entrepreneurship’s impact on sustainability in Korean organizations," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Debadutta K. Panda, 2019. "Competitive dynamics in not-for-profit organizations: evidence from India," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 36(4), pages 1251-1274, December.
    4. Andreea-Angela ?EULEAN (VON?EA), 2019. "Cause-Related Marketing Under The Lens Of Fundraising Methods," Business Excellence and Management, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 9(2), pages 5-13, June.
    5. Korbi, Fadia Bahri & Liu, Yang & Hossain, Mokter, 2026. "Resource mobilization through bricolage for sustainable outcomes in a non-profit organization," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    6. Denisa Gajdová & Helena Majdúchová, 2018. "Financial Sustainability Criteria and their testing in the conditions of the Slovak Non-Profit Sector," Contemporary Economics, Vizja University, vol. 12(1), March.
    7. Jindřich Špička & Petr Boukal & Hana Vávrová, 2016. "Discussion about Evaluation of Private Non-profit Success," Ekonomika a Management, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2016(2).
    8. Syrus M Islam, 2022. "Social impact scaling strategies in social enterprises: A systematic review and research agenda," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 47(2), pages 298-321, May.
    9. Gabriel Plata & Stephanie Scott & Sebastian Aparicio, 2026. "Fostering an environment for social entrepreneurship: a comparative analysis across economic development levels," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 135-168, January.
    10. Sophie Bacq & Frank Janssen & Anne-Sophie Sabbatucci & Amélie Wuillaume, 2026. "The dark side of doing good: a guiding framework for advancing research on the negative outcomes of social entrepreneurship," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 66(2), pages 647-674, February.
    11. Lester M. Salamon & Stephanie Geller & S. Wojciech Sokolowski, 2014. "Navigating the Future," World Bank Publications - Reports 34904, The World Bank Group.
    12. Sebastian Ion Ceptureanu & Eduard Gabriel Ceptureanu & Vlad Liviu Bogdan & Violeta Radulescu, 2018. "Sustainability Perceptions in Romanian Non-Profit Organizations: An Exploratory Study Using Success Factor Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-23, January.
    13. Assefa Belay & Halleluya Dessalegn, 2024. "An Assessment of Challenges Faced in Implementing Projects: The Case of Young Women’s Christian Association," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(4), pages 3-23.
    14. Alshawaaf, Nasser & Lee, Soo Hee, 2021. "Business model innovation through digitisation in social purpose organisations: A comparative analysis of Tate Modern and Pompidou Centre," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 597-608.
    15. Siebold, Nicole, 2021. "Reference points for business model innovation in social purpose organizations: A stakeholder perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 710-719.
    16. Cheng, Colin C.J. & Shiu, Eric C., 2022. "A two-level, longitudinal investigation into the effects of employee social entrepreneurship orientation and top management team decisions on product innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    17. G. Lumpkin & Todd Moss & David Gras & Shoko Kato & Alejandro Amezcua, 2013. "Entrepreneurial processes in social contexts: how are they different, if at all?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 40(3), pages 761-783, April.
    18. Fehrer, Julia A. & Wieland, Heiko, 2021. "A systemic logic for circular business models," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 609-620.
    19. Sanzo-Pérez, María José & Álvarez-González, Luis I., 2022. "Partnerships between Spanish social enterprises and nonprofits: A rich hybridity-based setting for social innovation," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    20. Denitsa Hazarbassanova Blagoeva & Peter D. Ørberg Jensen & Hemant Merchant, 2020. "Services in International Business Studies: A Replication and Extension of Merchant and Gaur (2008)," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 60(3), pages 427-457, June.
    21. Elsahn, Ziad & Earl, Anna, 2022. "Alternative ways of studying time in qualitative international business research: A review and future agenda," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 28(3).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eur:ejesjr:198. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mentisia (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://mentisia.org/index.php/ejes .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.