IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxivy2021ispecial5p506-532.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comprehensive, Multiple Level Assessment and Multiple Criteria Ranking of Transportation Projects

Author

Listed:
  • Jacek Zak
  • Miroslaw Kruszynski

Abstract

Purpose: The transportation projects are evaluated comprehensively, using different perspectives and aspects of assessment. The purpose of the paper is to present the assessment methodology Design/Methodology/Approach: The evaluation has been formulated as a multiple level, multiple criteria ranking problem with a hierarchical, 3-level structure. At each level of the analysis the transportation projects are assessed by a set of criteria, including transportation project operational characteristics, transportation policy – based, tactical criteria and a high-level, long-term impact, strategic measures. Separate rankings of the considered projects have been generated for all levels of the hierarchy. Their original aggregation procedure, based on the transportation projects’ utilities has been proposed and resulted in the ranking of all projects. Findings: The developed methodology, called Hierarchical – Multiple Level, Multiple Criteria Evaluation (HMLMCE) of TP-s has its significance both from a theoretical and practical point of view. It has been applied in a large city of Poznan, Poland as an important decision-making tool for municipal authorities considering the implementation of concrete transportation projects in the city/ metropolitan area. Practical Implications: Solution’s application showed the ability to analyze the impact of transportation projects on basic traffic characteristics of the city, their influence on tactical aspects associated with the implementation of sustainable transportation policy in the city as well as their role in the fulfillment of the city strategy. The proposed method can be applied in any urban transportation system and after slight modifications in other transportation and logistics systems. Originality/Value: The paper presents an original and universal approach to assessing and ranking transportation projects – TP-s featured by the extension and improvement of an urban transportation system.

Suggested Citation

  • Jacek Zak & Miroslaw Kruszynski, 2021. "Comprehensive, Multiple Level Assessment and Multiple Criteria Ranking of Transportation Projects," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 5), pages 506-532.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:special5:p:506-532
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/2747/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. De Brucker, Klaas & Macharis, Cathy & Verbeke, Alain, 2011. "Multi-criteria analysis in transport project evaluation: an institutional approach," European Transport \ Trasporti Europei, ISTIEE, Institute for the Study of Transport within the European Economic Integration, issue 47, pages 3-24.
    2. Ennio Cascetta, 2009. "Transportation Systems Analysis," Springer Optimization and Its Applications, Springer, number 978-0-387-75857-2, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paola Panuccio, 2019. "Smart Planning: From City to Territorial System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Kepaptsoglou, Konstantinos & Stathopoulos, Antony & Karlaftis, Matthew G., 2017. "Ridership estimation of a new LRT system: Direct demand model approach," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 146-156.
    3. Piyapong Suwanno & Chaiwat Yaibok & Noriyasu Tsumita & Atsushi Fukuda & Kestsirin Theerathitichaipa & Manlika Seefong & Sajjakaj Jomnonkwao & Rattanaporn Kasemsri, 2023. "Estimation of the Evacuation Time According to Different Flood Depths," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-23, April.
    4. Pierluigi Coppola & Fulvio Silvestri, 2021. "Gender Inequality in Safety and Security Perceptions in Railway Stations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-15, April.
    5. Helai Huang & Jialing Wu & Fang Liu & Yiwei Wang, 2020. "Measuring Accessibility Based on Improved Impedance and Attractive Functions Using Taxi Trajectory Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-23, December.
    6. David Watling & Giulio Cantarella, 2015. "Model Representation & Decision-Making in an Ever-Changing World: The Role of Stochastic Process Models of Transportation Systems," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 843-882, September.
    7. Rinaldi, Marco & Viti, Francesco, 2017. "Exact and approximate route set generation for resilient partial observability in sensor location problems," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 86-119.
    8. Ofentse Mokwena, 2016. "Paratransit Mesoeconomy: Control Measures From The Supply Side?," Proceedings of Economics and Finance Conferences 3205591, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    9. Luís M. Fernandes & Joaquim J. Júdice & Hanif D. Sherali & António P. Antunes, 2011. "Siting and Sizing of Facilities under Probabilistic Demands," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 149(2), pages 420-440, May.
    10. Eva Malichová & Ghadir Pourhashem & Tatiana Kováčiková & Martin Hudák, 2020. "Users’ Perception of Value of Travel Time and Value of Ridesharing Impacts on Europeans’ Ridesharing Participation Intention: A Case Study Based on MoTiV European-Wide Mobility and Behavioral Pattern ," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-19, May.
    11. Federico Benassi & Marica D'Elia & Francesca Petrei, 2021. "The “meso” dimension of territorial capital: Evidence from Italy," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(1), pages 159-175, February.
    12. Vitalii Naumov & Andrzej Szarata & Hanna Vasiutina, 2022. "Simulating a Macrosystem of Cargo Deliveries by Road Transport Based on Big Data Volumes: A Case Study of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-23, July.
    13. Juying Wang & Feng Guan & Ting Li & Can Wang & Qianqian Han & Bin Yu, 2015. "Optimization of the Waterbus Operation Plan Considering Carbon Emissions: The Case of Zhoushan City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-18, August.
    14. Igor Lazov, 2019. "A Methodology for Revenue Analysis of Parking Lots," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 177-198, March.
    15. Harshad Khadilkar, 2017. "Data-Enabled Stochastic Modeling for Evaluating Schedule Robustness of Railway Networks," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(4), pages 1161-1176, November.
    16. Miroslaw Kruszynski & Jacek Zak, 2021. "Group-Oriented, Hierarchical and Multiple Criteria Evaluation of Urban Transportation Projects," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 5), pages 91-121.
    17. Wang, Xinchang & Meng, Qiang & Miao, Lixin, 2016. "Delimiting port hinterlands based on intermodal network flows: Model and algorithm," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 32-51.
    18. A. Baral & S. M. Shahandashti, 2022. "Identifying critical combination of roadside slopes susceptible to rainfall-induced failures," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 113(2), pages 1177-1198, September.
    19. Caggiani, Leonardo & Ottomanelli, Michele & Dell’Orco, Mauro, 2014. "Handling uncertainty in Multi Regional Input-Output models by entropy maximization and fuzzy programming," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 159-172.
    20. Reis, Vasco, 2014. "Analysis of mode choice variables in short-distance intermodal freight transport using an agent-based model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 100-120.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Transportation projects; hierarchical evaluation; multiple criteria analysis.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M2 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics
    • L9 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:special5:p:506-532. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.