IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxivy2021ispecial2-part1p719-736.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Internal Credit Risk Models and Digital Transformation: What to Prepare for? An Application to Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Natalia Nehrebecka

Abstract

Purpose: The digitization of credit risk through machine learning technology is becoming more attractive, especially nowadays. The article aims to analyze the performance of models estimated with Machine Learning (ML) algorithms in predicting the risk of default compared with standard statistical models such as logistic regression (benchmark model). Design/Methodology/Approach: The indicated models were estimated using an original dataset, including financial information and the credit history of non-financial Polish enterprises. The dataset is also enlarged 20-fold to obtain a set of the so-called Big Data that could also be accepted. The out-of-sample performance comparing one-year-ahead PD estimates and observed default data for the 2015-2020 period was verified about the models under consideration. The period above also includes that associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. Findings: Based on the results obtained, practical information was supplied to credit-risk researchers. Where only a limited data set is available, and where this is confined to financial indicators only, models based on ML are seen to offer a significant increase in discriminant power and precision as compared with statistical models, this being especially the case with an artificially generated set of so-called Big Data. Practical Implications: Models estimated with ML algorithms can benchmark the probability of default obtained using more apparent statistical models. In practice, this is useful when estimates under the two types of model prove notably different. Application is handy with, for example, more significant or higher-risk borrowers. Originality/Value: The article seeks to ascertain how the market expansion of a bank's product and digital divisions might be supported without the speed and quality of credit-risk assessment is limited. The inclusion here of the COVID-19 (exogenous economic shock) period ensures the particular usefulness of recommendations for credit-risk analysts.

Suggested Citation

  • Natalia Nehrebecka, 2021. "Internal Credit Risk Models and Digital Transformation: What to Prepare for? An Application to Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 2), pages 719-736.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:special2-part1:p:719-736
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/2505/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jan-Henning Trustorff & Paul Konrad & Jens Leker, 2011. "Credit risk prediction using support vector machines," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 36(4), pages 565-581, May.
    2. Härdle, Wolfgang Karl & Moro, Rouslan A. & Schäfer, Dorothea, 2007. "Estimating probabilities of default with support vector machines," Discussion Paper Series 2: Banking and Financial Studies 2007,18, Deutsche Bundesbank.
    3. Victor Chernozhukov & Denis Chetverikov & Mert Demirer & Esther Duflo & Christian Hansen & Whitney Newey & James Robins, 2018. "Double/debiased machine learning for treatment and structural parameters," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 21(1), pages 1-68, February.
    4. Wiginton, John C., 1980. "A Note on the Comparison of Logit and Discriminant Models of Consumer Credit Behavior," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(3), pages 757-770, September.
    5. Jankowitsch, Rainer & Pichler, Stefan & Schwaiger, Walter S.A., 2007. "Modelling the economic value of credit rating systems," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 181-198, January.
    6. Edward I. Altman, 1968. "Financial Ratios, Discriminant Analysis And The Prediction Of Corporate Bankruptcy," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 23(4), pages 589-609, September.
    7. Wolfgang Härdle & Yuh-Jye Lee & Dorothea Schäfer & Yi-Ren Yeh, 2009. "Variable selection and oversampling in the use of smooth support vector machines for predicting the default risk of companies," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(6), pages 512-534.
    8. Wolfgang Härdle & Yuh-Jye Lee & Dorothea Schäfer & Yi-Ren Yeh, 2007. "The Default Risk of Firms Examined with Smooth Support Vector Machines," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 757, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    9. Natalia Nehrebecka, 2021. "COVID-19: stress-testing non-financial companies: a macroprudential perspective. The experience of Poland," Eurasian Economic Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 11(2), pages 283-319, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:special3:p:719-736 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Nehrebecka Natalia, 2018. "Predicting the Default Risk of Companies. Comparison of Credit Scoring Models: Logit Vs Support Vector Machines," Econometrics. Advances in Applied Data Analysis, Sciendo, vol. 22(2), pages 54-73, June.
    3. Hyeongjun Kim & Hoon Cho & Doojin Ryu, 2022. "Corporate Bankruptcy Prediction Using Machine Learning Methodologies with a Focus on Sequential Data," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 59(3), pages 1231-1249, March.
    4. Li, Chunyu & Lou, Chenxin & Luo, Dan & Xing, Kai, 2021. "Chinese corporate distress prediction using LASSO: The role of earnings management," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    5. Zeineb Affes & Rania Hentati-Kaffel, 2016. "Forecast bankruptcy using a blend of clustering and MARS model - Case of US banks," Post-Print halshs-01314553, HAL.
    6. repec:hum:wpaper:sfb649dp2013-037 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Wolfgang Härdle & Yuh-Jye Lee & Dorothea Schäfer & Yi-Ren Yeh, 2009. "Variable selection and oversampling in the use of smooth support vector machines for predicting the default risk of companies," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(6), pages 512-534.
    8. Wolfgang K. Härdle & Rouslan A. Moro & Dorothea Schäfer, 2004. "Rating Companies with Support Vector Machines," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 416, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    9. Kéa Baret & Amélie Barbier-Gauchard & Théophilos Papadimitriou, 2021. "Forecasting the Stability and Growth Pact compliance using Machine Learning," Working Papers of BETA 2021-01, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    10. Yao-Zhi Xu & Jian-Lin Zhang & Ying Hua & Lin-Yue Wang, 2019. "Dynamic Credit Risk Evaluation Method for E-Commerce Sellers Based on a Hybrid Artificial Intelligence Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-17, October.
    11. Tang, Lingxiao & Cai, Fei & Ouyang, Yao, 2019. "Applying a nonparametric random forest algorithm to assess the credit risk of the energy industry in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 563-572.
    12. Anatoly Peresetsky & Alexandr Karminsky & Sergei Golovan, 2011. "Probability of default models of Russian banks," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 44(4), pages 297-334, November.
    13. repec:hum:wpaper:sfb649dp2008-005 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Martin Kukuk & Michael Rönnberg, 2013. "Corporate credit default models: a mixed logit approach," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 40(3), pages 467-483, April.
    15. Marco Locurcio & Francesco Tajani & Pierluigi Morano & Debora Anelli & Benedetto Manganelli, 2021. "Credit Risk Management of Property Investments through Multi-Criteria Indicators," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-23, June.
    16. Peresetsky, A. A., 2011. "What factors drive the Russian banks license withdrawal," MPRA Paper 41507, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Olga A. Bekirova & Andrey V. Zubarev, 2022. "Оценка Вероятности Банкротства Компаний Обрабатывающей Промышленности С Учетом Макроэкономической Конъюнктуры," Russian Economic Development (in Russian), Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy, issue 12, pages 18-27, December.
    18. Ha-Thu Nguyen, 2014. "Default Predictors in Credit Scoring - Evidence from France’s Retail Banking Institution," EconomiX Working Papers 2014-26, University of Paris Nanterre, EconomiX.
    19. Jairaj Gupta & Andros Gregoriou & Jerome Healy, 2015. "Forecasting bankruptcy for SMEs using hazard function: To what extent does size matter?," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 45(4), pages 845-869, November.
    20. Alessandra Amendola & Marialuisa Restaino & Luca Sensini, 2010. "Variabile Selection in Forecasting Models for Corporate Bankruptcy," Working Papers 3_216, Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Statistiche, Università degli Studi di Salerno.
    21. Olga A. Bekirova & Andrey V. Zubarev, 2022. "Estimating the Bankruptcy Probability of Manufacturing Companies Considering Macroeconomic Conditions [Оценка Вероятности Банкротства Компаний Обрабатывающей Промышленности С Учетом Макроэкономичес," Russian Economic Development, Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy, issue 12, pages 18-27, December.
    22. Peresetsky, Anatoly, 2013. "Modeling reasons for Russian bank license withdrawal: Unaccounted factors," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 30(2), pages 49-64.
    23. Paulo V. Carvalho & José D. Curto & Rodrigo Primor, 2022. "Macroeconomic determinants of credit risk: Evidence from the Eurozone," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(2), pages 2054-2072, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Digitization; COVID-19; credit risk; big data; machine learning.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C45 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Neural Networks and Related Topics
    • C52 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Model Evaluation, Validation, and Selection
    • C63 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Computational Techniques
    • G33 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Bankruptcy; Liquidation
    • L25 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Firm Performance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:special2-part1:p:719-736. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.