IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxivy2021i3p629-637.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identifying the Relationship Between Business Model and Competitiveness Using Rough Set Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Karol Kuczera

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to show the possibility of using Rough Set Theory to identify the relationship between a business model and company competitiveness. Design/Methodology/Approach: Rough Set Theory operates on large data sets and allows for the reduction of irrelevant data and the induction of decision rules that discover recurrence and dependencies in data. The discovered rules can become the basis for making business decisions. Findings: The relationship between a business model and company competitiveness can be identified through Rough Set Theory, and the results can take the form of clear and easily interpretable decision rules, if the premise, then the conclusion. Practical Implications: The identified decision rules can provide a rationale for the design or development of organizations, thus, enhancing the chance of success by relying on correctly validated company behavior. The proposed approach can also be used to identify relationships in other business environments or address diverse variables, such as other aspects of competitiveness. Originality/Value: The study will verify the usefulness of Rough Set Theory for building a rule base for decision-making regarding the construction of business models that offer a chance to boost the companies' competitiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Karol Kuczera, 2021. "Identifying the Relationship Between Business Model and Competitiveness Using Rough Set Theory," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 629-637.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:3:p:629-637
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ersj.eu/journal/2375/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Salvatore Greco & Benedetto Matarazzo & Roman Słowiński, 2016. "Decision Rule Approach," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Salvatore Greco & Matthias Ehrgott & José Rui Figueira (ed.), Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis, edition 2, chapter 0, pages 497-552, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barbati, Maria & Greco, Salvatore & Kadziński, Miłosz & Słowiński, Roman, 2018. "Optimization of multiple satisfaction levels in portfolio decision analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 192-204.
    2. Oppio, Alessandra & Dell’Ovo, Marta & Torrieri, Francesca & Miebs, Grzegorz & Kadziński, Miłosz, 2020. "Understanding the drivers of Urban Development Agreements with the rough set approach and robust decision rules," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    3. Khaled Belahcène & Vincent Mousseau & Wassila Ouerdane & Marc Pirlot & Olivier Sobrie, 2023. "Multiple criteria sorting models and methods—Part I: survey of the literature," 4OR, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-46, March.
    4. Smedberg, Henrik & Bandaru, Sunith, 2023. "Interactive knowledge discovery and knowledge visualization for decision support in multi-objective optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(3), pages 1311-1329.
    5. Du, Wen Sheng & Hu, Bao Qing, 2018. "A fast heuristic attribute reduction approach to ordered decision systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(2), pages 440-452.
    6. Denis Bouyssou & Thierry Marchant & Marc Pirlot, 2020. "A theoretical look at ELECTRE TRI-nB," Working Papers hal-02917994, HAL.
    7. Cinelli, Marco & Kadziński, Miłosz & Miebs, Grzegorz & Gonzalez, Michael & Słowiński, Roman, 2022. "Recommending multiple criteria decision analysis methods with a new taxonomy-based decision support system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(2), pages 633-651.
    8. Denis Bouyssou & Thierry Marchant & Marc Pirlot, 2020. "A theoretical look at ELECTRE TRI-nB," Working Papers hal-02898131, HAL.
    9. Denis Bouyssou & Thierry Marchant & Marc Pirlot, 2023. "A theoretical look at Electre Tri-nB and related sorting models," 4OR, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-31, March.
    10. Sawassi, Aymen & Ottomano Palmisano, Giovanni & Crookston, Brian & Khadra, Roula, 2022. "The Dominance-based Rough Set Approach for analysing patterns of flexibility allocation and design-cost criteria in large-scale irrigation systems," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    11. Cinelli, Marco & Kadziński, Miłosz & Gonzalez, Michael & Słowiński, Roman, 2020. "How to support the application of multiple criteria decision analysis? Let us start with a comprehensive taxonomy," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    12. Paweł Ziemba, 2019. "Towards Strong Sustainability Management—A Generalized PROSA Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-29, March.
    13. Figueira, José Rui & Oliveira, Henrique M. & Serro, Ana Paula & Colaço, Rogério & Froes, Filipe & Robalo Cordeiro, Carlos & Diniz, António & Guimarães, Miguel, 2023. "A multiple criteria approach for building a pandemic impact assessment composite indicator: The case of COVID-19 in Portugal," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(2), pages 795-818.
    14. Du, Wen Sheng & Hu, Bao Qing, 2017. "Dominance-based rough fuzzy set approach and its application to rule induction," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(2), pages 690-703.
    15. Barbati, Maria & Corrente, Salvatore & Greco, Salvatore, 2020. "A general space-time model for combinatorial optimization problems (and not only)," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    16. Marco Cinelli & Matteo Spada & Miłosz Kadziński & Grzegorz Miebs & Peter Burgherr, 2019. "Advancing Hazard Assessment of Energy Accidents in the Natural Gas Sector with Rough Set Theory and Decision Rules," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-17, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Rough Set Theory; business model; competitiveness.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M21 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - Business Economics
    • M13 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - New Firms; Startups
    • L22 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Firm Organization and Market Structure

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:3:p:629-637. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.