IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v317y2024i2p414-424.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Explaining and predicting customer churn by monotonic rules induced from ordinal data

Author

Listed:
  • Szeląg, Marcin
  • Słowiński, Roman

Abstract

In the course of a computational experiment on bank customer churn data, we demonstrate the explanatory and predictive capacity of monotonic decision rules. The data exhibit a partially ordinal character, as certain attribute value sets describing the clients are ordered and demonstrate a monotonic relationship with churn or non-churn outcomes. The data are structured by the Variable Consistency Dominance-based Rough Set Approach (VC-DRSA) prior to the induction of monotonic decision rules. The supervised learning is conducted using an extended version of VC-DRSA, implemented in RuLeStudio and RuleVisualization programs. The first one is designed to experiment with parameterized rule models, and the second one is used for visualization and a thorough examination of the rule model. The monotonic decision rules give insight into the bank data, characterizing loyal customers and the ones who left the bank. Such an approach is in line with explainable AI, aiming to obtain a transparent decision model, that can be easily understood by decision-makers. We also compare the predictive performance of monotonic rules with some well-known machine learning models.

Suggested Citation

  • Szeląg, Marcin & Słowiński, Roman, 2024. "Explaining and predicting customer churn by monotonic rules induced from ordinal data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 317(2), pages 414-424.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:317:y:2024:i:2:p:414-424
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2023.09.028
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221723007440
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2023.09.028?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:317:y:2024:i:2:p:414-424. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.