IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/politi/v4y2025i2id8168.html

Legal Protection of Copyright Towards Work Piracy for ‘Paid Stories’ Written Works on Wattpad Platform: A Case Study in Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Natassja Putri Gumilang
  • Fennieka Kristianto

Abstract

In the digital era, Wattpad makes it easy for writers to publish their work especially after Paid Stories launched openly but inevitably related to copyright issues, especially piracy. This study aims to determine the legal protection system against Paid Stories piracy in Wattpad, using a qualitative normative-empirical method, and a case study approach with the results of an interview with one of Wattpad’s active writers, focusing on Law No. 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright. To address these issues, Wattpad should enhance copyright protection through technological innovations, such as automated notifications and tracking systems to detect and flag potential infringements. Additionally, the platform could improve contractual terms for Paid Stories authors to ensure shared accountability and foster stronger collaborations with global copyright enforcement organizations. By combining legal frameworks, technological advancements, and public education, Wattpad can create a supportive environment where authors’ rights are protected, and copyright violations are minimized.

Suggested Citation

  • Natassja Putri Gumilang & Fennieka Kristianto, 2025. "Legal Protection of Copyright Towards Work Piracy for ‘Paid Stories’ Written Works on Wattpad Platform: A Case Study in Indonesia," European Journal of Law and Political Science, European Open Science, vol. 4(2), pages 15-21, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:epw:politi:v:4:y:2025:i:2:id:8168
    DOI: 10.24018/ejpolitics.2025.4.2.168
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/politics/article/view/8168
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/politics/article/download/8168/1487
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/ejpolitics.2025.4.2.168?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hassan Aleassa & John Pearson & Scott McClurg, 2011. "Investigating Software Piracy in Jordan: An Extension of the Theory of Reasoned Action," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 98(4), pages 663-676, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Selma Kadić-Maglajlić & Maja Arslanagić-Kalajdžić & Milena Micevski & Nina Michaelidou & Ekaterina Nemkova, 2017. "Controversial Advert Perceptions in SNS Advertising: The Role of Ethical Judgement and Religious Commitment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 141(2), pages 249-265, March.
    2. Ciprian-Marcel Pop & Andreea–Ioana Romonti-Maniu & Monica-Maria Zaharie, 2017. "Opportunistic Consumer Behaviour in the Context of Digital Piracy," MIC 2017: Managing the Global Economy; Proceedings of the Joint International Conference, Monastier di Treviso, Italy, 24–27 May 2017,, University of Primorska Press.
    3. Dario Miocevic & Ivana Kursan Milakovic, 2023. "How ethical and political identifications drive adaptive behavior in the digital piracy context," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(1), pages 256-273, January.
    4. Steven James Watson & Daniel John Zizzo & Piers Fleming, 2015. "Determinants of Unlawful File Sharing: A Scoping Review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-23, June.
    5. Oylum Korkut Altuna & F. Müge Arslan & A. Ercan Gegez & Özge Sýðýrcý, 2016. "Development of a Scale on e-Consumers’ Attitudes towards Ethically Questionable Online Behaviors," Bogazici Journal, Review of Social, Economic and Administrative Studies, Bogazici University, Department of Economics, vol. 30(1), pages 99-134.
    6. Zheng, Qinqin & Luo, Yadong & Maksimov, Vladislav, 2015. "Achieving legitimacy through corporate social responsibility: The case of emerging economy firms," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 389-403.
    7. Mateja Kos Koklic & Monika Kukar-Kinney & Irena Vida, 2016. "Three-Level Mechanism of Consumer Digital Piracy: Development and Cross-Cultural Validation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 134(1), pages 15-27, March.
    8. Bert Weijters & Frank Goedertier & Sofie Verstreken, 2014. "Online Music Consumption in Today’s Technological Context: Putting the Influence of Ethics in Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 124(4), pages 537-550, November.
    9. Izzatul Jannah & Muamar Nur Kholid, 2020. "Ethics theory and theory of reasoned action in e-book piracy: An empirical study of accounting students," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 9(3), pages 114-122, April.
    10. Barnes, Stuart J. & Mattsson, Jan, 2017. "Understanding collaborative consumption: Test of a theoretical model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 281-292.
    11. Taewoo Roh & Young Soo Yang & Shufeng Xiao & Byung Il Park, 2024. "What makes consumers trust and adopt fintech? An empirical investigation in China," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 3-35, March.
    12. Koay, Kian Yeik & Tjiptono, Fandy & Sandhu, Manjit Singh, 2020. "Digital piracy among consumers in a developing economy: A comparison of multiple theory-based models," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    13. Mahmut Sonmez & Deli Yang & Gerald Fryxell, 2013. "Interactive Role of Consumer Discrimination and Branding against Counterfeiting: A Study of Multinational Managers’ Perception of Global Brands in China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 115(1), pages 195-211, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:politi:v:4:y:2025:i:2:id:8168. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/politics .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.