IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/ejmath/v3y2022i4id14127.html

Vector Error Correction Model: Prediction of Bi-Directional Causality between Gross Domestic Product and Wage Growth in Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Mburu S. Njoroge
  • Gladys G. Njoroge
  • Adolphus Wagala

Abstract

Economic growth and wage growth are very prominent macroeconomic variables in all countries in the World. These two variables are the main signposts signaling the current trends in an economy. To determine the recent behavior of the economy, the government must study and analyze these major variables. The increase in aggregate production in the Kenyan economy has been deteriorating due to the steady rise in the wage bill, especially since the year 2012, in conjunction with the devolved government. An increase in wage rate motivates workers and, in turn, increases the production capacity of a country hence economic growth. An increase in recurrent expenditure implies that the development expenditure will be condensed, which will alter the growth of the economy. The primary goal of this research was to fit vector error correction model on gross domestic product and wage growth data so as to identify the bidirectional causality effects between the two variables. VEC model is superior since it distinguishes between long run and short run relationship among underlying variables in a large sample size. The linear Granger causality test was used to evaluate the causal relationship between the system's variables; hence a causal research design was adopted in this study. This research employed secondary data, which was analyzed using Eviews and STATA statistical software. Data on these target variables was acquired from the World Bank and Central Bank of Kenya. Lastly, this study used yearly time series data for the period 1979 to 2019. It was found that wage growth and GDP granger causes each other and also have a long run relationship since their respective p values were less than 5% significance level. VECM1 (effects of wage growth on GDP) had AIC of -0.2953, RMSE of 1.0039 while the R-squared was 0.7241. Subsequently, effects of GDP on wage growth (VECM2) was found to have an R-squared of 0.7452, AIC of -8.2270 and RMSE of 0.08363. Based on the foregoing findings, it was determined that GDP has more influence on wage growth both in the short and long run. This study thus recommends that the government should keep inflation under control, increase development expenditure to finance projects and fostering a favorable business environment for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) to upsurge total output (productivity) which will in turn, lead to a rise in wage growth, thus a high standard of living for the millions of unemployed Kenyans. Finally, the findings of the current study are expected to be of significance to academicians and also provide appropriate policy options that will help in harmonizing the wage rates, thus managing recurrent expenditure in Kenya.

Suggested Citation

  • Mburu S. Njoroge & Gladys G. Njoroge & Adolphus Wagala, 2022. "Vector Error Correction Model: Prediction of Bi-Directional Causality between Gross Domestic Product and Wage Growth in Kenya," European Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, European Open Science, vol. 3(4), pages 6-16, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:epw:ejmath:v:3:y:2022:i:4:id:14127
    DOI: 10.24018/ejmath.2022.3.4.127
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejmath/article/view/14127
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejmath/article/download/14127/3180
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/ejmath.2022.3.4.127?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. Hashem Pesaran & Yongcheol Shin & Richard J. Smith, 2001. "Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(3), pages 289-326.
    2. Holm-Hadulla, Fédéric & Kamath, Kishore & Lamo, Ana & Pérez, Javier J. & Schuknecht, Ludger, 2010. "Public wages in the euro area - towards securing stability and competitiveness," Occasional Paper Series 112, European Central Bank.
    3. Robert Engle & Clive Granger, 2015. "Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation, and testing," Applied Econometrics, Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 39(3), pages 106-135.
    4. Pfaff, Bernhard, 2008. "VAR, SVAR and SVEC Models: Implementation Within R Package vars," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 27(i04).
    5. Holm-Hadulla, Fédéric & Kamath, Kishore & Lamo, Ana & Pérez, Javier J. & Schuknecht, Ludger, 2010. "Public wages in the euro area - towards securing stability and competitiveness," Occasional Paper Series 112, European Central Bank.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bertelli, Stefano & Vacca, Gianmarco & Zoia, Maria, 2022. "Bootstrap cointegration tests in ARDL models," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    2. Tan, Bee Wah & Tang, Chor Foon, 2011. "The dynamic relationship between private domestic investment, the user cost of capital, and economic growth in Malaysia," MPRA Paper 27964, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Georgios Bertsatos & Plutarchos Sakellaris & Mike G. Tsionas, 2022. "Correction to: Extensions of the Pesaran, Shin and Smith (2001) bounds testing procedure," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 62(2), pages 635-635, February.
    4. Nisamudheen, P.P. & Shareef, K. Hassan, 2025. "The role of human capital in driving renewable energy and sustainable development in India," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    5. Muhammad Shafiullah & Ravinthirakumaran Navaratnam, 2016. "Do Bangladesh and Sri Lanka Enjoy Export-Led Growth? A Comparison of Two Small South Asian Economies," South Asia Economic Journal, Institute of Policy Studies of Sri Lanka, vol. 17(1), pages 114-132, March.
    6. Shuyang Chen, 2021. "The Urbanisation Impacts on the Policy Effects of the Carbon Tax in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-11, June.
    7. Zheng, Li & Abbasi, Kashif Raza & Salem, Sultan & Irfan, Muhammad & Alvarado, Rafael & Lv, Kangjuan, 2022. "How technological innovation and institutional quality affect sectoral energy consumption in Pakistan? Fresh policy insights from novel econometric approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    8. Birendra Bahadur Budha, 2013. "Demand for Money in Nepal: An ARDL Bounds Testing Approach," NRB Economic Review, Nepal Rastra Bank, Economic Research Department, vol. 25(1), pages 21-36, April.
    9. Francesca Iorio & Stefano Fachin, 2014. "Savings and investments in the OECD: a panel cointegration study with a new bootstrap test," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 1271-1300, June.
    10. Theodosios Anastasios Perifanis, 2022. "The Macroeconomic Results of Diligent Resource Revenues Management: The Norwegian Case," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-14, February.
    11. Lawrence U. Okoye & Alexander E. Omankhanlen & Johnson I. Okoh & Ngozi B. Adeleye & Felix N. Ezeji & Gideon K. Ezu & Benjamin I. Ehikioya, 2021. "Analyzing the Energy Consumption and Economic Growth Nexus in Nigeria," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, vol. 11(1), pages 378-387.
    12. Soumen Rej & Barnali Nag & Md. Emran Hossain, 2024. "Foreign Direct Investment, Income Inequality and Pollution Reduction: Policy Trilemma for India," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 174(1), pages 221-248, August.
    13. Md. Sharif Hossain & Md. Thasinul Abedin, 2016. "Multivariate Dynamic Co-integration and Causality Analysis between Inflation and its Determinants," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 8(5), pages 240-250.
    14. R. Santos Alimi, 2014. "ARDL Bounds Testing Approach to Cointegration: A Re-Examination of Augmented Fisher Hypothesis in an Open Economy," Asian Journal of Economic Modelling, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 2(2), pages 103-114, June.
    15. Po-Chin Wu & Chung-Chih Lee, 2018. "The non-linear impact of monetary policy on international reserves: macroeconomic variables nexus," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 45(1), pages 165-185, February.
    16. Herzer Dierk, 2022. "Semi-endogenous Versus Schumpeterian Growth Models: A Critical Review of the Literature and New Evidence," Review of Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 73(1), pages 1-55, April.
    17. Liu, Yaping & Sadiq, Farah & Ali, Wajahat & Kumail, Tafazal, 2022. "Does tourism development, energy consumption, trade openness and economic growth matters for ecological footprint: Testing the Environmental Kuznets Curve and pollution haven hypothesis for Pakistan," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    18. Ulrich Witt & Christian Gross, 2020. "The rise of the “service economy” in the second half of the twentieth century and its energetic contingencies," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 231-246, April.
    19. Hande Aksöz Yılmaz, 2020. "The Impact of Foreign Trade on Immigration from Turkey to Germany: ARDL Bounds Test Approach," Journal of Economy Culture and Society, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 62(62), pages 123-143, December.
    20. Özcan Karahan & Olcay Çolak, 2019. "Examining the Validity of Wagner's Law versus Keynesian Hypothesis: Evidence from Turkey's Economy," Scientific Annals of Economics and Business (continues Analele Stiintifice), Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 66(1), pages 117-130, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejmath:v:3:y:2022:i:4:id:14127. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejmath .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.