IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

The economic–environment relation: can post-Keynesians, Régulationists and Polanyians offer insights?

Listed author(s):
  • Lynne Chester

    (The University of Sydney)

  • Joy Paton

    (The University of Sydney)

As the environmental debate has intensified, post-Keynesians, Régulationists and Polanyians remain relatively silent. All treat time as historical, consider economic issues subordinate to politics and have plenty to say about growth, institutions, uncertainty and path-dependent events. These concepts seem pertinent to understanding the economic–environment problematic. This article explores the ‘environmental potential’ of these three heterodox economic traditions. We examine the conception of nature underpinning each methodological approach and the ability of their key conceptual tools to explain the economic–environment relation. Methodological pluralism and a project driven by the neoclassical agenda, we posit, seriously weakens the possibility of a post-Keynesian-grounded coherent environmental perspective. On the other hand, the Régulationists and Polanyians provide cogent analytical frameworks to advance explanations of the economic–environment relation and the contemporary environmental challenge.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: Restricted access

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by Edward Elgar Publishing in its journal European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention.

Volume (Year): 10 (2013)
Issue (Month): 1 ()
Pages: 106-121

in new window

Handle: RePEc:elg:ejeepi:v:10:y:2013:i:1:p106-121
Contact details of provider: Web page:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

in new window

  1. J. E. King, 2012. "Post Keynesians and Others," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 305-319, April.
  2. Robinson, Joan, 1972. "The Second Crisis of Economic Theory," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 62(2), pages 1-10, May.
  3. Eric Berr, 2009. "Keynes and Sustainable Development," Post-Print hal-00439271, HAL.
  4. Engelbert Stockhammer & Paul Ramskogler, 2008. "Post Keynesian economics - how to move forward," Department of Economics Working Papers wuwp124, Vienna University of Economics and Business, Department of Economics.
  5. John Gowdy & Mario Giampietro & Jesus Ramos-Martin & Kozo Mayumi, 2009. "Incorporating Biophysical Foundations in a Hierarchical Model of Societal Metabolism," Chapters, in: Post Keynesian and Ecological Economics, chapter 10 Edward Elgar Publishing.
  6. Nicholas Low, 2002. "Ecosocialisation and environmental planning: a Polanyian approach," Environment and Planning A, Pion Ltd, London, vol. 34(1), pages 43-60, January.
  7. Kronenberg, Tobias, 2010. "Finding common ground between ecological economics and post-Keynesian economics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(7), pages 1488-1494, May.
  8. Eric Berr, 2009. "Keynes and Sustainable Development," International Journal of Political Economy, M.E. Sharpe, Inc., vol. 38(3), pages 22-38, September.
  9. Nicholas Low, 2002. "Ecosocialisation and Environmental Planning: A Polanyian Approach," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 34(1), pages 43-60, January.
  10. Marc Lavoie, 2012. "Perspectives for Post-Keynesian Economics," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 321-335, April.
  11. Clive L. Spash & Anthony Ryan, 2012. "Economic Schools of Thought on the Environment: Investigating Unity and Division," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 36(5), pages 1091-1121.
  12. Stephen P. Dunn, 2000. "Wither Post Keynesianism?," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, M.E. Sharpe, Inc., vol. 22(3), pages 343-364, April.
  13. Jonathan M. Harris, 2013. "Green Keynesianism: Beyond Standard Growth Paradigms," GDAE Working Papers 13-02, GDAE, Tufts University.
  14. Frank H. Knight, 1941. "Anthropology and Economics," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 49, pages 247-247.
  15. J. E. King, 2002. "A History of Post Keynesian Economics since 1936," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 2135.
  16. Andrew Mearman, 2007. "Post Keynesian economics and the environment: waking up and smelling the coffee burning?," International Journal of Green Economics, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(3/4), pages 374-380.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:elg:ejeepi:v:10:y:2013:i:1:p106-121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Helen Craven)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.