Poverty, Inequality, and the Role of Government: What Would Adam Smith Say?
This paper uses Smith's views on the distribution of income and poverty to support the argument that Smith's advocacy of laissez-faire was limited and historically specific. It discusses the relevance of these views in providing philosophical underpinning for modern social policy. Examination of Smith's ideas using the frameworks of several modern theoretical constructs, including Rawlsian justice, interdependent utility functions, countervailing power, and the theory of the second best, helps to make this link between eighteenth century thought and twentieth century policy analysis.
Volume (Year): 18 (1992)
Issue (Month): 2 (Spring)
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Phone: (201) 684-7346
Web page: http://www.ramapo.edu/eea/journal.html
More information through EDIRC
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Michael Perelman, 1989. "Adam Smith and Dependent Social Relations," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 21(3), pages 503-520, Fall.
- Hochman, Harold M & Rodgers, James D, 1969. "Pareto Optimal Redistribution," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 59(4), pages 542-57, Part I Se.
- Nathan Rosenberg, 1990. "Adam Smith and the Stock of Moral Capital," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 22(1), pages 1-18, Spring.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eej:eeconj:v:18:y:1992:i:2:p:143-156. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Victor Matheson, College of the Holy Cross)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.