IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v179y2026ics0967070x26000181.html

Causal impacts of demand responsive transit on public transit demand: A spatial assessment framework

Author

Listed:
  • Kim, Eui-Jin
  • Oh, Dain
  • Kim, Hyunmyung

Abstract

Demand-responsive transit (DRT) offers a flexible travel option complementary to the existing fixed-route transit (FRT), improving accessibility and mobility. However, how the adoption of DRT reshapes the new public transit (PT) system, consisting of DRT and FRT, has not yet been sufficiently explored. This study proposes a spatial assessment framework based on causal impact inference to evaluate the impact of DRT on the PT system and performs empirical analysis for DRT service areas in rural areas of Korea. Our framework identifies the spatial area where significant changes in the PT system occur and quantifies the changes in terms of DRT and FRT, respectively. Then, the effects of sociodemographic and built environment factors on changes in the PT system are investigated using regression models. The bias of spatial analysis resulting from the choice of spatial units, known as the modifiable areal unit problem, is identified and addressed by the community-level residential clustering method. The results indicate that approximately half of the residents in the service area experienced a significant increase in PT usage of around 30 %. The service area with a lower population density, a lower proportion of elderly residents, a lower business population, a lower existing bus trip rate, and a higher bus stop density is more likely to benefit from DRT in increasing PT usage. These findings provide valuable insights into devising strategies to introduce new DRT services and evaluate existing ones.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim, Eui-Jin & Oh, Dain & Kim, Hyunmyung, 2026. "Causal impacts of demand responsive transit on public transit demand: A spatial assessment framework," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:179:y:2026:i:c:s0967070x26000181
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2026.104008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X26000181
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tranpol.2026.104008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chao Wang & Mohammed Quddus & Marcus Enoch & Tim Ryley & Lisa Davison, 2014. "Multilevel modelling of Demand Responsive Transport (DRT) trips in Greater Manchester based on area-wide socio-economic data," Transportation, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 589-610, May.
    2. Coutinho, Felipe Mariz & van Oort, Niels & Christoforou, Zoi & Alonso-González, María J. & Cats, Oded & Hoogendoorn, Serge, 2020. "Impacts of replacing a fixed public transport line by a demand responsive transport system: Case study of a rural area in Amsterdam," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    3. Zhang, Yunchang & Fricker, Jon D., 2021. "Quantifying the impact of COVID-19 on non-motorized transportation: A Bayesian structural time series model," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 11-20.
    4. Hui Wang & Jinyang Li & Pengling Wang & Jing Teng & Becky P. Y. Loo, 2023. "Adaptability analysis methods of demand responsive transit: a review and future directions," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(4), pages 676-697, July.
    5. Imhof, Sebastian & Blättler, Kevin, 2023. "Assessing spatial characteristics to predict DRT demand in rural Switzerland," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    6. Pani, Agnivesh & Sahu, Prasanta K. & Chandra, Aitichya & Sarkar, Ashoke K., 2019. "Assessing the extent of modifiable areal unit problem in modelling freight (trip) generation: Relationship between zone design and model estimation results," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    7. Quadrifoglio, Luca & Dessouky, Maged M. & Ordóñez, Fernando, 2008. "A simulation study of demand responsive transit system design," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 718-737, May.
    8. Nykiforuk, Candace I.J. & Glenn, Nicole M. & Hosler, Ian & Craig, Heather & Reynard, Darcy & Molner, Brittany & Candlish, Jared & Lowe, Sammy, 2021. "Understanding urban accessibility: A community-engaged pilot study of entrance features," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    9. Baier, Moritz Jon & Sörensen, Leif & Schlüter, Jan Christian, 2024. "How successful is my DRT system? A review of different parameters to consider when developing flexible public transport systems," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 130-142.
    10. Schasché, Stephanie E. & Sposato, Robert G. & Hampl, Nina, 2022. "The dilemma of demand-responsive transport services in rural areas: Conflicting expectations and weak user acceptance," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 43-54.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fabian Anzenhofer & David Fleckenstein & Robert Klein & Claudius Steinhardt, 2025. "Analyzing the impact of demand management in rural shared mobility-on-demand systems," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 47(4), pages 1267-1335, December.
    2. Peter Džupka & Radovan Dráb & Marek Gróf & Tomáš Štofa, 2024. "Exploring Willingness to Pay across Different Passenger Traits," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Hu, Sangen & Li, Chun & Wu, Weitiao & Yang, Ying, 2025. "Exploring the determinants of demand-responsive transit acceptance in China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 150-163.
    4. Å. Jevinger & H. Svensson, 2025. "On demand-responsive transport configurations, traveller interaction and preferences: a survey from the perspective of older people," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 715-754, October.
    5. Imhof, Sebastian & Blättler, Kevin, 2023. "Assessing spatial characteristics to predict DRT demand in rural Switzerland," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    6. Zhu, Yuanfang & Jiang, Meilan & Morikawa, Takayuki & Yamamoto, Toshiyuki & Zhao, Zhijian & Sato, Hitomi & Ogai, Yusaku & Nakashita, Misaki & Matsuzoe, Shizuko & Ueki, Miwa, 2026. "Exploring preferences for demand-responsive transport in rural Japan: An integrated probabilistic choice set and latent variable approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    7. Yang, Zhiwei & Liu, Han & Chen, Xiaohong & Zhou, Jun & Yuan, Quan, 2025. "Discovering the origins of freight demand: An empirical investigation of spatial heterogeneity in the generation of heavy-duty truck trips," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 60-79.
    8. Kim, Myungseob (Edward) & Schonfeld, Paul, 2015. "Maximizing net benefits for conventional and flexible bus services," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 116-133.
    9. Hora Jakub & Císařová Hana, 2025. "Forms of Booking on-demand Transport," LOGI – Scientific Journal on Transport and Logistics, Sciendo, vol. 16(1), pages 49-58.
    10. Shuai Yu & Bin Li & Dongmei Liu, 2023. "Exploring the Public Health of Travel Behaviors in High-Speed Railway Environment during the COVID-19 Pandemic from the Perspective of Trip Chain: A Case Study of Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Urban Agglomeration, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-22, January.
    11. Pani, Agnivesh & Mishra, Sabya & Sahu, Prasanta, 2022. "Developing multi-vehicle freight trip generation models quantifying the relationship between logistics outsourcing and insourcing decisions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    12. Zahra Navidi & Nicole Ronald & Stephan Winter, 2018. "Comparison between ad-hoc demand responsive and conventional transit: a simulation study," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 147-167, May.
    13. Knierim, Lukas & Schlüter, Jan Christian, 2021. "The attitude of potentially less mobile people towards demand responsive transport in a rural area in central Germany," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    14. Xingpei Yan & Zheng Zhu, 2021. "Quantifying the impact of COVID-19 on e-bike safety in China via multi-output and clustering-based regression models," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(8), pages 1-15, August.
    15. Middela, Mounisai Siddartha & Ramadurai, Gitakrishnan, 2024. "Effect of the measurement period and spatial dependence on the accuracy of urban freight trip generation models," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    16. Jörn Schönberger, 2017. "Scheduling constraints in dial-a-ride problems with transfers: a metaheuristic approach incorporating a cross-route scheduling procedure with postponement opportunities," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 243-272, July.
    17. Ghimire, Subid & Bardaka, Eleni & Monast, Kai & Wang, Juan & Wright, Waugh, 2024. "Policy, management, and operation practices in U.S. microtransit systems," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 259-278.
    18. Berrada, Jaâfar & Poulhès, Alexis, 2021. "Economic and socioeconomic assessment of replacing conventional public transit with demand responsive transit services in low-to-medium density areas," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 317-334.
    19. Márquez, Luis & Cantillo, Víctor & Paternina-Arboleda, Carlos D., 2024. "Temporal accessibility and freight generation of agricultural products: An empirical study in Colombia," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    20. Wang, Hui & Loo, Becky P.Y., 2024. "The public transport disadvantaged in a highly transit-oriented city: An analytical framework, key challenges and opportunities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:179:y:2026:i:c:s0967070x26000181. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.