IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transe/v180y2023ics1366554523003289.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decision-making models for formulating and evaluating supplier development programs: A state-of-the-art review and research paths

Author

Listed:
  • Resende, Carlos Henrique Lopes
  • Lima-Junior, Francisco Rodrigues
  • Carpinetti, Luiz Cesar Ribeiro

Abstract

Supplier development refers to the efforts of a purchasing company and its suppliers to improve supplier performance and its ability to fulfill the purchasing company’s supply needs. Recently, several quantitative models have appeared in the literature that support decision-making processes regarding supplier development programs (SDPs). To update the latest research related to this subject, as well as contribute towards the establishment of a research agenda, this study presents a review of the literature on decision-making models that assist the formulating and evaluating of SDPs. This review analyzes 65 articles published in relevant journals, which are characterized in terms of several factors which are inherent to decision making in supplier development. The results show that most models focus on formulating SDPs, whereas the most common decision-making methods are Data Envelopment Analysis and Rough Set Theory. The use of multicriteria models and Fuzzy Sets has increased. The research gaps identified allowed us to propose some future research directions on the topic, calling attention to the need of developing new models considering elements that have not yet been studied in the literature, as well as performing comparative studies between them. Our results here can help orient researchers and managers in developing their decision-making processes in terms of SDP formulation and evaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • Resende, Carlos Henrique Lopes & Lima-Junior, Francisco Rodrigues & Carpinetti, Luiz Cesar Ribeiro, 2023. "Decision-making models for formulating and evaluating supplier development programs: A state-of-the-art review and research paths," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:180:y:2023:i:c:s1366554523003289
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2023.103340
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554523003289
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tre.2023.103340?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:180:y:2023:i:c:s1366554523003289. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.