IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v79y2015icp121-133.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Coordinated online in-vehicle routing balancing user optimality and system optimality through information perturbation

Author

Listed:
  • Du, Lili
  • Han, Lanshan
  • Chen, Shuwei

Abstract

The inconsistence between system optimality and user optimality represents one of the key difficulties on network traffic congestion control. The advanced connected vehicle systems, enabling smart vehicles to possess/exchange real-time information and conduct portable computation, provide new opportunities to address this challenge. Motivated by this view, this study proposes a coordinated online in-vehicle routing mechanism with intentional information provision perturbation (CRM-IP), which seeks to shape individual vehicles online routing decisions so that user optimality and system optimality are balanced, by exploiting bounded rationality of the users. The proposed CRM-IP is modeled as a pure strategy atomic routing game, and implemented by a sequentially updating distributed algorithm. The mathematical analysis is conducted to quantify the absolute gain of system optimality corresponding to the loss of user optimality resulting from a given level of the information perturbation in the worst case so that the efficiency of the information perturbation can be evaluated. Furthermore, numerical experiments conducted based on City of Sioux Falls network investigate the average effects of the CRM-IP on system optimality and user optimality under various network traffic conditions, comparing to the CRM developed by Du et al. (in press). The results indicate that the improvement of system optimality and the reduction of individual vehicles’ travel time from the CRM is more significant when the network traffic is under an mild congestion state, such as under the levels of service (LOS’s) C, D, and E, rather than under extremely sparse or congested states, such as under LOS’s A and B, or F. Moreover, higher level of information perturbation benefits system optimality more, but the marginal effect decreases after the perturbation reaching certain level, such as λ=0.1 in this case study. In addition, a portion of vehicles may sacrifice user optimality due to the information perturbation, but the extent of the sacrifice is not significant, even though it increases with the information perturbation level. Hence, a small information perturbation is recommended to achieve an efficient network traffic control through the CRM-IP. Overall, this study proposes the CRM-IP as an efficient routing mechanism, which has a great potential to guide the routing decisions of individual vehicles so that their collective behavior improve network performance in both system optimality and user optimality.

Suggested Citation

  • Du, Lili & Han, Lanshan & Chen, Shuwei, 2015. "Coordinated online in-vehicle routing balancing user optimality and system optimality through information perturbation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 121-133.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:79:y:2015:i:c:p:121-133
    DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2015.05.020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191261515001241
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.trb.2015.05.020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Du, Lili & Han, Lanshan & Li, Xiang-Yang, 2014. "Distributed coordinated in-vehicle online routing using mixed-strategy congestion game," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 1-17.
    2. Papageorgiou, Markos, 1990. "Dynamic modeling, assignment, and route guidance in traffic networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 24(6), pages 471-495, December.
    3. Yannis Pavlis & Markos Papageorgiou, 1999. "Simple Decentralized Feedback Strategies for Route Guidance in Traffic Networks," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 264-278, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Baiocchi, Andrea, 2016. "Analysis of timer-based message dissemination protocols for inter-vehicle communications," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 105-134.
    2. Rambha, Tarun & Boyles, Stephen D. & Unnikrishnan, Avinash & Stone, Peter, 2018. "Marginal cost pricing for system optimal traffic assignment with recourse under supply-side uncertainty," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 104-121.
    3. Ning, Yuqiang & Du, Lili, 2023. "Robust and resilient equilibrium routing mechanism for traffic congestion mitigation built upon correlated equilibrium and distributed optimization," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 170-205.
    4. Qu, Xiaobo & Zhang, Jin & Wang, Shuaian, 2017. "On the stochastic fundamental diagram for freeway traffic: Model development, analytical properties, validation, and extensive applications," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 256-271.
    5. Pi, Xidong & Qian, Zhen (Sean), 2017. "A stochastic optimal control approach for real-time traffic routing considering demand uncertainties and travelers’ choice heterogeneity," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 710-732.
    6. Hu, Xiao-Bing & Zhang, Ming-Kong & Zhang, Qi & Liao, Jian-Qin, 2017. "Co-Evolutionary path optimization by Ripple-Spreading algorithm," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 411-432.
    7. Le Zhang & Lijing Lyu & Shanshui Zheng & Li Ding & Lang Xu, 2022. "A Q-Learning-Based Approximate Solving Algorithm for Vehicular Route Game," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-14, September.
    8. Liu, Siyuan & Qu, Qiang, 2016. "Dynamic collective routing using crowdsourcing data," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 450-469.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pi, Xidong & Qian, Zhen (Sean), 2017. "A stochastic optimal control approach for real-time traffic routing considering demand uncertainties and travelers’ choice heterogeneity," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 710-732.
    2. Zhou, Bo & Song, Qiankun & Zhao, Zhenjiang & Liu, Tangzhi, 2020. "A reinforcement learning scheme for the equilibrium of the in-vehicle route choice problem based on congestion game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 371(C).
    3. Gentile, Guido & Meschini, Lorenzo & Papola, Natale, 2007. "Spillback congestion in dynamic traffic assignment: A macroscopic flow model with time-varying bottlenecks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(10), pages 1114-1138, December.
    4. Baiocchi, Andrea, 2016. "Analysis of timer-based message dissemination protocols for inter-vehicle communications," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 105-134.
    5. Bellei, Giuseppe & Gentile, Guido & Papola, Natale, 2005. "A within-day dynamic traffic assignment model for urban road networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 1-29, January.
    6. Jin, Wen-Long, 2010. "Continuous kinematic wave models of merging traffic flow," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(8-9), pages 1084-1103, September.
    7. Dinopoulou, Vaya & Diakaki, Christina & Papageorgiou, Markos, 2006. "Applications of the urban traffic control strategy TUC," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(3), pages 1652-1665, December.
    8. Jin, Wen-Long & Zhang, H. Michael, 2013. "An instantaneous kinematic wave theory of diverging traffic," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 1-16.
    9. Alvarez, Luis & Horowitz, Roberto, 1997. "Safe Platooning In Automated Highway Systems," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt1v97t5w1, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    10. Yu, Hao & Ma, Rui & Zhang, H. Michael, 2018. "Optimal traffic signal control under dynamic user equilibrium and link constraints in a general network," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 302-325.
    11. Sheu, Jiuh-Biing, 2006. "A composite traffic flow modeling approach for incident-responsive network traffic assignment," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 367(C), pages 461-478.
    12. Apostolos Kotsialos, 2010. "A hydrodynamic modelling framework for production networks," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 61-83, January.
    13. Le Vine, Scott & Polak, John, 2016. "A novel peer-to-peer congestion pricing marketplace enabled by vehicle-automation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 483-494.
    14. Lam, William H. K. & Huang, Hai-Jun, 1995. "Dynamic user optimal traffic assignment model for many to one travel demand," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 243-259, August.
    15. Long, Jiancheng & Szeto, W.Y. & Gao, Ziyou & Huang, Hai-Jun & Shi, Qin, 2016. "The nonlinear equation system approach to solving dynamic user optimal simultaneous route and departure time choice problems," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 179-206.
    16. Jin, Wen-Long, 2009. "Asymptotic traffic dynamics arising in diverge-merge networks with two intermediate links," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 43(5), pages 575-595, June.
    17. Jin, Wen-Long, 2012. "A kinematic wave theory of multi-commodity network traffic flow," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(8), pages 1000-1022.
    18. Jahn, Olaf & Möhring, Rolf & Schulz, Andreas & Stier Moses, Nicolás, 2004. "System-Optimal Routing of Traffic Flows with User Constraints in Networks with Congestion," Working papers 4394-02, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    19. Du, Lili & Gong, Siyuan, 2016. "Stochastic Poisson game for an online decentralized and coordinated parking mechanism," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 44-63.
    20. Kotsialos, Apostolos & Papageorgiou, Markos, 2004. "Motorway network traffic control systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(2), pages 321-333, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:79:y:2015:i:c:p:121-133. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.