IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v206y2026ics0191261526000184.html

A simulation heuristic for traveler- and vehicle-discrete dynamic traffic assignment

Author

Listed:
  • Flötteröd, Gunnar

Abstract

A dynamic traffic assignment problem is considered where travelers are modeled as integral decision makers and network flow is composed of integral vehicles. As travel behavior affects network conditions and network conditions affect travel behavior, a complex model system results. The versatility of the considered model class has led to increasing practical interest (“agent-based simulation”) but also complicates the development of solvers for mutually consistent travel behavior and network conditions that represent possible long-term states of a transport system. Continuum flow assignment techniques are not applicable to this model class. This work starts out from a Nikaido-Isoda gap function for the traveler- and vehicle-discrete dynamic traffic assignment problem. A tractable but rather uninformative upper bound on this gap function is derived. A reformulation is presented that violates this bound as little as possible while ensuring that the reformulated bound carries relevant information for the subsequently developed new assignment heuristic. The proposed approach is formally related to and experimentally compared with relevant methods from the literature. It is found to exhibit superior performance in nontrivial case studies for Stockholm (Sweden), Oslo (Norway), and Berlin (Germany).

Suggested Citation

  • Flötteröd, Gunnar, 2026. "A simulation heuristic for traveler- and vehicle-discrete dynamic traffic assignment," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:206:y:2026:i:c:s0191261526000184
    DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2026.103406
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191261526000184
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.trb.2026.103406?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Soora Rasouli & Harry Timmermans, 2014. "Activity-based models of travel demand: promises, progress and prospects," International Journal of Urban Sciences, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 31-60, March.
    2. Cascetta, Ennio, 1989. "A stochastic process approach to the analysis of temporal dynamics in transportation networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 1-17, February.
    3. Anna Heusinger & Christian Kanzow, 2009. "Optimization reformulations of the generalized Nash equilibrium problem using Nikaido-Isoda-type functions," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 353-377, July.
    4. S. Mahmassani, Hani & F. Hyland, Michael, 2016. "Gap-based transit assignment algorithm with vehicle capacity constraints: Simulation-based implementation and large-scale applicationAuthor-Name: Verbas, Ömer," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 1-16.
    5. Hazelton, Martin L., 2022. "The emergence of stochastic user equilibria in day-to-day traffic models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 102-112.
    6. Satsukawa, Koki & Wada, Kentaro & Watling, David, 2022. "Dynamic system optimal traffic assignment with atomic users: Convergence and stability," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 188-209.
    7. Oyama, Yuki & Hara, Yusuke & Akamatsu, Takashi, 2022. "Markovian traffic equilibrium assignment based on network generalized extreme value model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 135-159.
    8. Farooq, Bilal & Bierlaire, Michel & Hurtubia, Ricardo & Flötteröd, Gunnar, 2013. "Simulation based population synthesis," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 243-263.
    9. Hooram Halat & Ali Zockaie & Hani S. Mahmassani & Xiang Xu & Omer Verbas, 2016. "Dynamic network equilibrium for daily activity-trip chains of heterogeneous travelers: application to large-scale networks," Transportation, Springer, vol. 43(6), pages 1041-1059, November.
    10. Michael J. Smith, 1984. "The Stability of a Dynamic Model of Traffic Assignment---An Application of a Method of Lyapunov," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(3), pages 245-252, August.
    11. Mas-Colell, Andreu & Whinston, Michael D. & Green, Jerry R., 1995. "Microeconomic Theory," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780195102680.
    12. Bellei, Giuseppe & Gentile, Guido & Papola, Natale, 2005. "A within-day dynamic traffic assignment model for urban road networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 1-29, January.
    13. Friesz, Terry L. & Han, Ke & Bagherzadeh, Amir, 2021. "Convergence of fixed-point algorithms for elastic demand dynamic user equilibrium," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 336-352.
    14. Lu, Chung-Cheng & Mahmassani, Hani S. & Zhou, Xuesong, 2009. "Equivalent gap function-based reformulation and solution algorithm for the dynamic user equilibrium problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 345-364, March.
    15. Michael Levin & Matt Pool & Travis Owens & Natalia Juri & S. Travis Waller, 2015. "Improving the Convergence of Simulation-based Dynamic Traffic Assignment Methodologies," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 655-676, September.
    16. Wang, Yi & Szeto, W.Y. & Han, Ke & Friesz, Terry L., 2018. "Dynamic traffic assignment: A review of the methodological advances for environmentally sustainable road transportation applications," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 370-394.
    17. Mounce, Richard & Carey, Malachy, 2011. "Route swapping in dynamic traffic networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 102-111, January.
    18. Hongbo Ye, 2022. "On Stochastic-User-Equilibrium-Based Day-to-Day Dynamics," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(1), pages 103-117, January.
    19. Flötteröd, G. & Osorio, C., 2017. "Stochastic network link transmission model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 180-209.
    20. Ke Han & Gabriel Eve & Terry L. Friesz, 2019. "Computing Dynamic User Equilibria on Large-Scale Networks with Software Implementation," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 869-902, September.
    21. Flötteröd, Gunnar & Bierlaire, Michel, 2013. "Metropolis–Hastings sampling of paths," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 53-66.
    22. Canella, Olivier & Flötteröd , Gunnar & Johnsson , Daniel & Kristoffersson, Ida & Larek, Patryk & Thelin , Joacim, 2016. "Flexible coupling of disaggregate travel demand models and network simulation packages (“IHOP2”): final project report," Working papers in Transport Economics 2016:3, CTS - Centre for Transport Studies Stockholm (KTH and VTI).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Smith, M.J. & Liu, R. & Mounce, R., 2015. "Traffic control and route choice: Capacity maximisation and stability," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 81(P3), pages 863-885.
    2. Liu, Ronghui & Smith, Mike, 2015. "Route choice and traffic signal control: A study of the stability and instability of a new dynamical model of route choice and traffic signal control," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 123-145.
    3. Wang, Dong & Liao, Feixiong & Gao, Ziyou & Timmermans, Harry, 2019. "Tolerance-based strategies for extending the column generation algorithm to the bounded rational dynamic user equilibrium problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 102-121.
    4. Ye, Hongbo & Xiao, Feng & Yang, Hai, 2021. "Day-to-day dynamics with advanced traveler information," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 23-44.
    5. Ren-Yong Guo & Hai Yang & Hai-Jun Huang, 2018. "Are We Really Solving the Dynamic Traffic Equilibrium Problem with a Departure Time Choice?," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(3), pages 603-620, June.
    6. Santos Sánchez-Cambronero & Fernando Álvarez-Bazo & Ana Rivas & Inmaculada Gallego, 2021. "Dynamic Route Flow Estimation in Road Networks Using Data from Automatic Number of Plate Recognition Sensors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-30, April.
    7. Du, Jinxiao & Ma, Wei, 2024. "Maximin headway control of automated vehicles for system optimal dynamic traffic assignment in general networks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    8. Duong Viet Thong & Aviv Gibali & Mathias Staudigl & Phan Tu Vuong, 2021. "Computing Dynamic User Equilibrium on Large-Scale Networks Without Knowing Global Parameters," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 735-768, September.
    9. Xu, Xiangdong & Qu, Kai & Chen, Anthony & Yang, Chao, 2021. "A new day-to-day dynamic network vulnerability analysis approach with Weibit-based route adjustment process," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    10. Peeta, Srinivas, 2016. "A marginal utility day-to-day traffic evolution model based on one-step strategic thinkingAuthor-Name: He, Xiaozheng," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 237-255.
    11. Dai Zusai, 2023. "Evolutionary dynamics in heterogeneous populations: a general framework for an arbitrary type distribution," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 52(4), pages 1215-1260, December.
    12. David Watling & Giulio Cantarella, 2015. "Model Representation & Decision-Making in an Ever-Changing World: The Role of Stochastic Process Models of Transportation Systems," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 843-882, September.
    13. Blom Västberg, Oskar & Karlström, Anders & Jonsson, Daniel & Sundberg, Marcus, 2016. "Including time in a travel demand model using dynamic discrete choice," MPRA Paper 75336, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 11 Nov 2016.
    14. David Watling, 2002. "A Second Order Stochastic Network Equilibrium Model, II: Solution Method and Numerical Experiments," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(2), pages 167-183, May.
    15. Satsukawa, Koki & Wada, Kentaro & Iryo, Takamasa, 2024. "Stability analysis of a departure time choice problem with atomic vehicle models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    16. Sun, Mingmei, 2023. "A day-to-day dynamic model for mixed traffic flow of autonomous vehicles and inertial human-driven vehicles," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    17. Dai Zusai, 2018. "Evolutionary dynamics in heterogeneous populations: a general framework for an arbitrary type distribution," Papers 1805.04897, arXiv.org, revised May 2019.
    18. Ren-Yong Guo & Hai Yang & Hai-Jun Huang, 2025. "A Two-Stage Iteration Method for Solving the Departure Time Choice Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(3), pages 565-586, June.
    19. Wenyi Zhang & Wei Guan & Jihui Ma & Tao Wang, 2013. "Nonlinear Min-Cost-Pursued Route-Swapping Dynamic System," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2013, pages 1-10, May.
    20. Jiayang Li & Zhaoran Wang & Yu Marco Nie, 2023. "Wardrop Equilibrium Can Be Boundedly Rational: A New Behavioral Theory of Route Choice," Papers 2304.02500, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2024.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:206:y:2026:i:c:s0191261526000184. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.