IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v162y2022icp229-260.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Joint berth allocation and ship loader scheduling under the rotary loading mode in coal export terminals

Author

Listed:
  • Cao, Zhen
  • Wang, Wenyuan
  • Jiang, Ying
  • Xu, Xinglu
  • Xu, Yunzhuo
  • Guo, Zijian

Abstract

Due to nonmatching between the efficiency of ship deballasting and terminal loading, operations in modern coal export terminals (CETs) are frequently interrupted and significantly restricted by ship deballasting delays. This paper addresses a novel integrated problem of berth allocation and ship loader scheduling arising in CETs with new features, including the symmetrical berth layout-based rotary loading mode (SBLRLM) and deballasting restrictions. A mixed-integer programming (MIP) model is proposed to make joint decisions to minimize the total tardiness of all ships. By exploring the problem's decomposable structure, an exact method that relies on logic-based Benders decomposition (LBBD) is proposed to obtain optimal solutions. According to the problem features, the monolithic MIP formulation is decomposed into a new MIP (master problem) and a constraint programming (subproblem). Combinatorial valid inequalities are developed to enhance the master problem model and obtain a tighter lower bound. A Benders cut strengthening heuristic is developed to generate feasibility and optimality cuts to ensure efficient algorithm convergence. To evaluate the proposed method, computational experiments are conducted on a set of test instances generated based on real data collected from a major CET in northern China. The results indicate that the LBBD algorithm can optimally solve large-scale problem instances within a reasonable amount of time. The plan generated by the LBBD algorithm achieves a 51.9% reduction in ship tardiness, on average, compared to that of practical scheduling methods. By using the proposed method, the superiority of the SBLRLM in reducing deballasting delays becomes more significant as the problem scale increases. In addition, considering different working intensities, the results could also help port operators make decisions about the number of berths in the SBLRLM.

Suggested Citation

  • Cao, Zhen & Wang, Wenyuan & Jiang, Ying & Xu, Xinglu & Xu, Yunzhuo & Guo, Zijian, 2022. "Joint berth allocation and ship loader scheduling under the rotary loading mode in coal export terminals," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 229-260.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:162:y:2022:i:c:p:229-260
    DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2022.06.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191261522001035
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.trb.2022.06.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guo, Zijian & Cao, Zhen & Wang, Wenyuan & Jiang, Ying & Xu, Xinglu & Feng, Peng, 2021. "An integrated model for vessel traffic and deballasting scheduling in coal export terminals," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    2. Saurabh Pratap & Yash Daultani & M. K. Tiwari & Biswajit Mahanty, 2018. "Rule based optimization for a bulk handling port operations," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 287-311, February.
    3. Zhen, Lu, 2016. "Modeling of yard congestion and optimization of yard template in container ports," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 83-104.
    4. Xiang, Xi & Liu, Changchun, 2021. "An almost robust optimization model for integrated berth allocation and quay crane assignment problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    5. Jenny Nossack & Dirk Briskorn & Erwin Pesch, 2018. "Container Dispatching and Conflict-Free Yard Crane Routing in an Automated Container Terminal," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(5), pages 1059-1076, October.
    6. Sumin Chen & Qingcheng Zeng & Yushan Hu, 2022. "Scheduling optimization for two crossover automated stacking cranes considering relocation," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 2099-2120, July.
    7. Lu Zhen & Qian Sun & Wei Zhang & Kai Wang & Wen Yi, 2021. "Column generation for low carbon berth allocation under uncertainty," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 72(10), pages 2225-2240, October.
    8. Unsal, Ozgur & Oguz, Ceyda, 2019. "An exact algorithm for integrated planning of operations in dry bulk terminals," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 103-121.
    9. Thomas Kalinowski & Reena Kapoor & Martin W. P. Savelsbergh, 2017. "Scheduling reclaimers serving a stock pad at a coal terminal," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 85-101, February.
    10. Soudagar A K Irfan Babu & Saurabh Pratap & Geet Lahoti & Kiran J Fernandes & Manoj K Tiwari & Matthew Mount & Yu Xiong, 2015. "Minimizing delay of ships in bulk terminals by simultaneous ship scheduling, stockyard planning and train scheduling," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 17(4), pages 464-492, December.
    11. J. N. Hooker, 2007. "Planning and Scheduling by Logic-Based Benders Decomposition," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 55(3), pages 588-602, June.
    12. Omar Abou Kasm & Ali Diabat & T. C. E. Cheng, 2020. "The integrated berth allocation, quay crane assignment and scheduling problem: mathematical formulations and a case study," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 291(1), pages 435-461, August.
    13. Umang, Nitish & Bierlaire, Michel & Vacca, Ilaria, 2013. "Exact and heuristic methods to solve the berth allocation problem in bulk ports," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 14-31.
    14. Wang, Tingsong & Wang, Xinchang & Meng, Qiang, 2018. "Joint berth allocation and quay crane assignment under different carbon taxation policies," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 117(PA), pages 18-36.
    15. Saurabh Pratap & Manoj Kumar B & Divyanshu Saxena & M.K. Tiwari, 2016. "Integrated scheduling of rake and stockyard management with ship berthing: a block based evolutionary algorithm," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(14), pages 4182-4204, July.
    16. Hamza Bouzekri & Gülgün Alpan & Vincent Giard, 2021. "Integrated Laycan and Berth Allocation and time-invariant Quay Crane Assignment Problem in tidal ports with multiple quays," Post-Print hal-03107972, HAL.
    17. Hamza Bouzekri & Gülgün Alpan & Vincent Giard, 2021. "Integrated Laycan and Berth Allocation and time-invariant Quay Crane Assignment Problem in tidal ports with multiple quays," Post-Print hal-02480102, HAL.
    18. Li, Shijie & Negenborn, Rudy R. & Lodewijks, Gabriel, 2017. "Closed-loop coordination of inland vessels operations in large seaports using hybrid logic-based benders decomposition," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 1-21.
    19. Sun, Defeng & Tang, Lixin & Baldacci, Roberto & Lim, Andrew, 2021. "An exact algorithm for the unidirectional quay crane scheduling problem with vessel stability," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(1), pages 271-283.
    20. Bouzekri, Hamza & Alpan, Gülgün & Giard, Vincent, 2021. "Integrated Laycan and Berth Allocation and time-invariant Quay Crane Assignment Problem in tidal ports with multiple quays," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(3), pages 892-909.
    21. Bierwirth, Christian & Meisel, Frank, 2015. "A follow-up survey of berth allocation and quay crane scheduling problems in container terminals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(3), pages 675-689.
    22. Xiaohuan Lv & Jian Gang Jin & Hao Hu, 2020. "Berth allocation recovery for container transshipment terminals," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(4), pages 558-574, June.
    23. Chargui, Kaoutar & Zouadi, Tarik & El Fallahi, Abdellah & Reghioui, Mohamed & Aouam, Tarik, 2021. "Berth and quay crane allocation and scheduling with worker performance variability and yard truck deployment in container terminals," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    24. Sun, Defeng & Tang, Lixin & Baldacci, Roberto, 2019. "A Benders decomposition-based framework for solving quay crane scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(2), pages 504-515.
    25. Zhen, Lu & Liang, Zhe & Zhuge, Dan & Lee, Loo Hay & Chew, Ek Peng, 2017. "Daily berth planning in a tidal port with channel flow control," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 193-217.
    26. Agra, Agostinho & Oliveira, Maryse, 2018. "MIP approaches for the integrated berth allocation and quay crane assignment and scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(1), pages 138-148.
    27. Iris, Çağatay & Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee, 2019. "Recoverable robustness in weekly berth and quay crane planning," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 365-389.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Raeesi, Ramin & Sahebjamnia, Navid & Mansouri, S. Afshin, 2023. "The synergistic effect of operational research and big data analytics in greening container terminal operations: A review and future directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(3), pages 943-973.
    2. Chargui, Kaoutar & Zouadi, Tarik & Sreedharan, V. Raja & El Fallahi, Abdellah & Reghioui, Mohamed, 2023. "A novel robust exact decomposition algorithm for berth and quay crane allocation and scheduling problem considering uncertainty and energy efficiency," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    3. Guo, Liming & Zheng, Jianfeng & Du, Haoming & Du, Jian & Zhu, Zhihong, 2022. "The berth assignment and allocation problem considering cooperative liner carriers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    4. Liu, Baoli & Li, Zhi-Chun & Wang, Yadong, 2022. "A two-stage stochastic programming model for seaport berth and channel planning with uncertainties in ship arrival and handling times," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    5. Meixian Jiang & Jiajia Feng & Jian Zhou & Lin Zhou & Fangzheng Ma & Guanghua Wu & Yuqiu Zhang, 2023. "Multi-Terminal Berth and Quay Crane Joint Scheduling in Container Ports Considering Carbon Cost," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-20, March.
    6. Zhen, Lu & Zhuge, Dan & Wang, Shuaian & Wang, Kai, 2022. "Integrated berth and yard space allocation under uncertainty," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1-27.
    7. Guo, Liming & Zheng, Jianfeng & Liang, Jinpeng & Wang, Shuaian, 2023. "Column generation for the multi-port berth allocation problem with port cooperation stability," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 3-28.
    8. Rodrigues, Filipe & Agra, Agostinho, 2022. "Berth allocation and quay crane assignment/scheduling problem under uncertainty: A survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(2), pages 501-524.
    9. Abou Kasm, Omar & Diabat, Ali & Chow, Joseph Y.J., 2023. "Simultaneous operation of next-generation and traditional quay cranes at container terminals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(3), pages 1110-1125.
    10. Sun, Defeng & Meng, Ying & Tang, Lixin & Liu, Jinyin & Huang, Baobin & Yang, Jiefu, 2020. "Storage space allocation problem at inland bulk material stockyard," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    11. Guo, Zijian & Cao, Zhen & Wang, Wenyuan & Jiang, Ying & Xu, Xinglu & Feng, Peng, 2021. "An integrated model for vessel traffic and deballasting scheduling in coal export terminals," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    12. Jaap-Jan Steeg & Menno Oudshoorn & Neil Yorke-Smith, 2023. "Berth planning and real-time disruption recovery: a simulation study for a tidal port," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 70-110, March.
    13. Shaojian Qu & Xinqi Li & Chang Liu & Xufeng Tang & Zhisheng Peng & Ying Ji, 2023. "Two-Stage Robust Programming Modeling for Continuous Berth Allocation with Uncertain Vessel Arrival Time," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-30, July.
    14. Xufeng Tang & Chang Liu & Xinqi Li & Ying Ji, 2023. "Distributionally Robust Programming of Berth-Allocation-with-Crane-Allocation Problem with Uncertain Quay-Crane-Handling Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-27, September.
    15. Damla Kizilay & Deniz Türsel Eliiyi, 2021. "A comprehensive review of quay crane scheduling, yard operations and integrations thereof in container terminals," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 1-42, March.
    16. Liu, Changchun, 2020. "Iterative heuristic for simultaneous allocations of berths, quay cranes, and yards under practical situations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    17. Xiang, Xi & Liu, Changchun, 2021. "An almost robust optimization model for integrated berth allocation and quay crane assignment problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    18. Kong, Lingrui & Ji, Mingjun & Gao, Zhendi, 2022. "An exact algorithm for scheduling tandem quay crane operations in container terminals," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    19. Abou Kasm, Omar & Diabat, Ali & Bierlaire, Michel, 2021. "Vessel scheduling with pilotage and tugging considerations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    20. Zhang, Canrong & Guan, Hao & Yuan, Yifei & Chen, Weiwei & Wu, Tao, 2020. "Machine learning-driven algorithms for the container relocation problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 102-131.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:162:y:2022:i:c:p:229-260. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.