IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v85y2016icp112-122.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling the cost sensitivity of intermodal inland waterway terminals: A scenario based approach

Author

Listed:
  • Smid, Martijn
  • Dekker, Sander
  • Wiegmans, Bart

Abstract

Cost characteristics of differently sized inland waterway terminals (IWTs) have not received much scientific attention. This observation is remarkable given the importance of costs in transportation decision-making. Classification of differently sized IWTs and their cost structure will lead to more insight into the container cost per terminal. Therefore, the goal of our research was to determine both the characteristics of the cost structure associated with different inland waterway (IWW) container terminal types and the sensitivity of the system to cost/TEU changes in input and operational conditions. We show that terminals with a higher container throughput encounter fewer costs, and can therefore charge a lower price. Assumed delays of 2h per day on the waterside cause a 4.7–6.6% cost increase per container, mainly caused by extra labor costs. It is also assumed that the changing climate will influence terminal operations and results in extreme water levels (lasting two weeks occurring four times a year) causing a cost increase of 1.0–3.4%. Subsidies can cause cost reductions of 0.3–10.4% depending on the exact form, with the smaller terminals benefiting more because their investment costs are higher relative to operational costs. A subsidy can lower costs by up to 10.4%, but it is questionable whether small and medium terminals will have a lower cost price than the market price, showing that it is important for small and medium terminals to quickly grow in size.

Suggested Citation

  • Smid, Martijn & Dekker, Sander & Wiegmans, Bart, 2016. "Modeling the cost sensitivity of intermodal inland waterway terminals: A scenario based approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 112-122.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:85:y:2016:i:c:p:112-122
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2016.01.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856416000069
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maguire, A. & Ivey, S. & Golias, M.M & Lipinski, M.E, 2010. "Relieving Congestion at Intermodal Marine Container Terminals: Review of Tactical/Operational Strategies," 51st Annual Transportation Research Forum, Arlington, Virginia, March 11-13, 2010 207280, Transportation Research Forum.
    2. Antoine Frémont & Pierre Franc, 2010. "Hinterland transportation in Europe: Combined transport versus road transport," Post-Print hal-00542346, HAL.
    3. Zhao, Wenjuan & Goodchild, Anne V., 2010. "The impact of truck arrival information on container terminal rehandling," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 327-343, May.
    4. Caris, A. & Macharis, C. & Janssens, G.K., 2011. "Network analysis of container barge transport in the port of Antwerp by means of simulation," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 125-133.
    5. Ballis, Athanasios & Golias, John, 2002. "Comparative evaluation of existing and innovative rail-road freight transport terminals," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 593-611, August.
    6. Erhan Kozan, 2006. "Optimum Capacity for Intermodal Container Terminals," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(6), pages 471-482, September.
    7. Dimitrios Tsamboulas & Ioannis Dimitropoulos, 1999. "Appraisal of investments in European nodal centres for goods – freight villages: A comparative analysis," Transportation, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 381-398, November.
    8. Bart W. Wiegmans, 2005. "Evaluation of Potentially Successful Barge Innovations," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(5), pages 573-589, February.
    9. Bontekoning, Y. M. & Macharis, C. & Trip, J. J., 2004. "Is a new applied transportation research field emerging?--A review of intermodal rail-truck freight transport literature," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 1-34, January.
    10. Lehtinen, Jarkko & Bask, Anu H., 2012. "Analysis of business models for potential 3Mode transport corridor," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 96-108.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wiercx, Max & van Kalmthout, Martijn & Wiegmans, Bart, 2019. "Inland waterway terminal yard configuration contributing to sustainability: Modeling yard operations," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 4-16.
    2. Witte, Patrick & Wiegmans, Bart & Ng, Adolf K.Y., 2019. "A critical review on the evolution and development of inland port research," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 53-61.
    3. Zhang, Ruiyou & Huang, Chao & Feng, Xuehao, 2020. "Empty container repositioning with foldable containers in a river transport network considering the limitations of bridge heights," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 197-213.
    4. Monios, Jason & Bergqvist, Rickard, 2019. "The transport geography of electric and autonomous vehicles in road freight networks," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leachman, Robert C. & Jula, Payman, 2012. "Estimating flow times for containerized imports from Asia to the United States through the Western rail network," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 296-309.
    2. Ramaekers, Katrien & Verdonck, Lotte & Caris, An & Meers, Dries & Macharis, Cathy, 2017. "Allocating collaborative costs in multimodal barge networks for freight bundling," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 56-69.
    3. Branislav Dragović & Ernestos Tzannatos & Nam Kuy Park, 2017. "Simulation modelling in ports and container terminals: literature overview and analysis by research field, application area and tool," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 4-34, March.
    4. Fazi, Stefano & Fransoo, Jan C. & Van Woensel, Tom & Dong, Jing-Xin, 2020. "A variant of the split vehicle routing problem with simultaneous deliveries and pickups for inland container shipping in dry-port based systems," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    5. Nils Boysen & Malte Fliedner & Florian Jaehn & Erwin Pesch, 2013. "A Survey on Container Processing in Railway Yards," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(3), pages 312-329, August.
    6. Marianne Fischman & Emeric Lendjel, 2012. "Maritime Ports And Inland Interconnections: A Transactional Analysis Of Container Barge Transport In France," Post-Print halshs-00741127, HAL.
    7. Boysen, Nils & Fliedner, Malte, 2010. "Determining crane areas in intermodal transshipment yards: The yard partition problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 204(2), pages 336-342, July.
    8. Qiu, Xuan & Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee & Huang, George Q., 2015. "A bilevel storage pricing model for outbound containers in a dry port system," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 65-83.
    9. Lehtinen, Jarkko & Bask, Anu H., 2012. "Analysis of business models for potential 3Mode transport corridor," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 96-108.
    10. Zhao, Laijun & Zhao, Yue & Hu, Qingmi & Li, Huiyong & Stoeter, Johan, 2018. "Evaluation of consolidation center cargo capacity and loctions for China railway express," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 58-81.
    11. Boysen, Nils & Fliedner, Malte & Jaehn, Florian & Pesch, Erwin, 2012. "Shunting yard operations: Theoretical aspects and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 220(1), pages 1-14.
    12. Marianne Fischman & Emeric Lendjel, 2012. "Maritime Ports And Inland Interconnections: A Transactional Analysis Of Container Barge Transport In France," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00741127, HAL.
    13. Qian Dai & Jiaqi Yang & Dong Li, 2018. "Modeling a Three-Mode Hybrid Port-Hinterland Freight Intermodal Distribution Network with Environmental Consideration: The Case of the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China," Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 10(9), pages 1-26, August.
    14. Casavant, Ken & Jessup, Eric, 2005. "What Makes them Viable? Determining the Attributes that Offer Potential Viability to Inter-Modal Truck-Rail Facilities in Washington State," 46th Annual Transportation Research Forum, Washington, D.C., March 6-8, 2005 208221, Transportation Research Forum.
    15. Peterson, Steven, 2005. "Factors Influencing Inter-Modal Facility Location Decisions: Comparison of Different Empirical Estimation Procedures," 46th Annual Transportation Research Forum, Washington, D.C., March 6-8, 2005 208177, Transportation Research Forum.
    16. Dong, Chuanwen & Transchel, Sandra, 2020. "A dual sourcing inventory model for modal split transport: Structural properties and optimal solution," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(3), pages 883-900.
    17. Zhang, M. & Pel, A.J., 2016. "Synchromodal hinterland freight transport: Model study for the port of Rotterdam," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1-10.
    18. Leonard Heilig & Stefan Voß, 0. "Information systems in seaports: a categorization and overview," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-23.
    19. Álvarez-SanJaime, Óscar & Cantos-Sánchez, Pedro & Moner-Colonques, Rafael & Sempere-Monerris, José J., 2015. "The impact on port competition of the integration of port and inland transport services," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 291-302.
    20. Panagiotis Ypsilantis & Rob Zuidwijk, 2019. "Collaborative Fleet Deployment and Routing for Sustainable Transport," Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 11(20), pages 1-26, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:85:y:2016:i:c:p:112-122. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Haili He). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.