IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/telpol/v50y2026i2s0308596125002125.html

Digitalization, AI and the rise of techno-religion: Transhumanist promises and the challenge to Enlightenment

Author

Listed:
  • Latzer, Michael

Abstract

Digitalization, currently spearheaded by artificial intelligence, not only disenchants but also re-enchants societies, giving rise to a transhumanism-shaped techno-religion that contests prevailing interpretations of the Enlightenment project in Western societies. This article draws on a long-term perspective on media change and a sociotechnical conception of the digitalization of societies as the Digital Trinity: the co-evolutionary interplay of datafication, algorithmization, and platformization. It argues that this trinity of transformative forces is marked by a transhumanist reinterpretation of Enlightenment and exhibits corresponding techno-religious features. These features are revealed both in societal functions (e.g., handling contingencies, contributing to sensemaking) and in individual experiences of digitalization (e.g., the feedback loop of sacralizing technology and the self). Transhumanist visions of a technically controllable human evolution and transcendence replicate and reinforce belief structures traditionally associated with organized religions. Drawing on critical-theoretical readings of Kant, the article demonstrates how the rise of this techno-religion and its underlying transhumanist reinterpretation of Enlightenment stand in tension with the prevailing Kantian conception of Enlightenment, whose emancipatory aim is to foster “maturity” through critical reason, rationality, and human autonomy. In response, it suggests a next wave of Enlightenment that moves beyond the anthropocentric 18th-century model by combining the safeguarding of traditional values with the overcoming of recognized shortcomings and adaptation to today's highly networked digital realities. It argues for curbing the mystical side of digitalization; reclaiming public discourse from transhumanist mythologies; and reframing human self-understanding within a networked, more ecocentric perspective, for example, by resisting the strong anthropomorphization of technological systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Latzer, Michael, 2026. "Digitalization, AI and the rise of techno-religion: Transhumanist promises and the challenge to Enlightenment," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(2).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:50:y:2026:i:2:s0308596125002125
    DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2025.103115
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308596125002125
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.telpol.2025.103115?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oliver Fernando Hidalgo & Alexander Yendell, 2022. "The Role of Religions and Conspiracy Theories in Democratic and Authoritarian Regimes," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(4), pages 132-134.
    2. Dirk Baecker, 2017. "Wie verändert die Digitalisierung unser Denken und unseren Umgang mit der Welt?," Springer Books, in: Rainer Gläß & Bernd Leukert (ed.), Handel 4.0, pages 3-24, Springer.
    3. Lambèr Royakkers & Rinie van Est, 2020. "The New Digital Wave of Rationalization: A Loss of Autonomy," International Journal of Technoethics (IJT), IGI Global Scientific Publishing, vol. 11(1), pages 59-74, January.
    4. Harracá, Martín & Castelló, Itziar & Gawer, Annabelle, 2023. "How Digital Platforms Organize Immaturity: A Sociosymbolic Framework of Platform Power," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 33(3), pages 440-472, July.
    5. Oliver Fernando Hidalgo, 2022. "Religions and Conspiracy Theories as the Authoritarian “Other” of Democracy?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(4), pages 146-156.
    6. Oliver Fernando Hidalgo, 2022. "Religions and Conspiracy Theories as the Authoritarian “Other” of Democracy?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(4), pages 146-156.
    7. Scherer, Andreas Georg & Neesham, Cristina & Schoeneborn, Dennis & Scholz, Markus, 2023. "New Challenges to the Enlightenment: How Twenty-First-Century Sociotechnological Systems Facilitate Organized Immaturity and How to Counteract It," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 33(3), pages 409-439, July.
    8. Johannes M. Bauer & Michael Latzer, 2024. "Co-evolution: applications and implications for governance research in communication studies," Chapters, in: Manuel Puppis & Robin Mansell & Hilde Van den Bulck (ed.), Handbook of Media and Communication Governance, chapter 7, pages 88-99, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    9. Oliver Fernando Hidalgo & Alexander Yendell, 2022. "The Role of Religions and Conspiracy Theories in Democratic and Authoritarian Regimes," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(4), pages 132-134.
    10. Suddaby, Roy & Ganzin, Max & Minkus, Alison, 2017. "Craft, magic and the re-enchantment of the world," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 285-296.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oliver Fernando Hidalgo & Alexander Yendell, 2022. "The Role of Religions and Conspiracy Theories in Democratic and Authoritarian Regimes," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(4), pages 132-134.
    2. Gawer, Annabelle & Harracá, Martín, 2025. "Inconsistent platform governance and social contagion of misconduct in digital ecosystems: A complementors perspective," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(8).
    3. Riederle, Philipp, 2026. "Does Digital Platform Interoperability Deliver on Its Expectations? Evidence from User Switching on Mastodon," SocArXiv 6wsrq_v1, Center for Open Science.
    4. Veronica Testolini & Lenore Thompson & Cristina Lemorini, 2023. "Archaeological Science and Experimental Archaeology Can Inform Sustainable Innovative Craft," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-13, October.
    5. Oliver Fernando Hidalgo & Alexander Yendell, 2022. "The Role of Religions and Conspiracy Theories in Democratic and Authoritarian Regimes," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(4), pages 132-134.
    6. Clavijo, Nathalie & Perray-Redslob, Ludivine, 2025. "Countering the pedagogy of cruelty with love from/for the South(s)," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    7. Mike Hodson & Andrew McMeekin & Andy Lockhart, 2025. "From platform capitalism to strategic place-based platformisation?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 57(6), pages 810-825, September.
    8. Bajde, Domen & Chelekis, Jessica & van Dalen, Arjen, 2022. "The megamarketing of microfinance: Developing and maintaining an industry aura of virtue," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 134-155.
    9. Diana Acosta Navas, 2025. "In Moderation: Automation in the Digital Public Sphere," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 200(2), pages 325-341, August.
    10. Farah, Maya F. & Ramadan, Zahy B. & Harb, Dana H., 2019. "The examination of virtual reality at the intersection of consumer experience, shopping journey and physical retailing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 136-143.
    11. Frédéric Bally & Albane Grandazzi & Hélène Picard & Thibault Daudigeos, 2025. "Digital and Disembedded? Questioning the Territorial Embeddedness of Local Digital Platforms," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 201(2), pages 265-285, October.
    12. Costanza Sartoris & Lydia Milly Certa & Sasha Piccione, 2025. "Organizing in a fluid social media sphere: the empowering and disempowering effects of ownership, openness, and stakeholder engagement through an affordance perspective," Working Papers 07, Venice School of Management - Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
    13. Rohny Saylors & Amrita Lahiri & Benjamin Warnick & Chandresh Baid, 2023. "Looking Back To Venture Forward: Exploring Idea and Identity Work in Public Failure Narratives," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 47(2), pages 398-429, March.
    14. Short, Jeremy C. & Chandler, Jeffrey A. & Wolfe, Marcus, 2024. "Community markets and entrepreneurship: A primer," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 21(C).
    15. Ana Alacovska, 2025. "The Re-enchantment of a Technologically Disenchanted World: An Affirmative Critique of Anti-surveillance Art," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 202(1), pages 1-19, November.
    16. Roundy, Philip T., 2020. "An “extra life” for the arcade? Entrepreneurship, hybridization, and industry renewal," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 14(C).
    17. Markus Reihlen & Matthias Wenzel & Monika Imschloss & Thomas Gehrig, 2025. "Futures Imagined: Navigating Sustainability, Digitalization, and Entrepreneurship in Business and Management Research," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 77(4), pages 585-596, December.
    18. Kruse, Daniel J. & Eling, Katrin & Herstatt, Cornelius, 2025. "How social entrepreneurs search for knowledge to solve complex social problems – An empirically based model and typology," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    19. Jayson Killoran & Jasmin Manseau & Andrew Park & Jan Kietzmann, 2025. "Supporting and Humiliating Dignity with Biometric Technologies: An Affordance Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 200(2), pages 307-324, August.
    20. M. Dolores Rio & Roy Suddaby, 2025. "Organizing the Good Death: Ethics and Values-Work in the Sower Hospice," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 197(4), pages 673-687, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:50:y:2026:i:2:s0308596125002125. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30471/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.