IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v87y2026ics0160791x26001685.html

Emotional attachment to AI chatbots: Evidence from Germany, China, South Africa, and the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Kostka, Genia
  • Zhou, Hui

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots are increasingly embedded in everyday life, yet their role extends beyond functional assistance to include affective human–machine interaction. While prior research has focused on social chatbots or niche user groups, little is known about the prevalence and consequences of emotional attachment to widely used, general-purpose systems. This study addresses this gap using cross-national survey data from Germany, China, South Africa, and the United States (N = 7027). We develop a dynamic interaction framework in which emotional attachment emerges from the interplay between perceived emotional support, social connectedness, and interaction patterns. Empirically, we show that emotional attachment is widespread: at least one third of users report attachment-related behaviors. Perceived emotional support—particularly reduced loneliness, freedom from judgment, and a sense of privacy—is the strongest predictor. Contrary to expectations, larger social networks are associated with stronger attachment. Emotional attachment is, in turn, strongly associated with indicators of user dependence. These findings highlight the growing affective integration of AI into social life and raise important questions for digital well-being and AI governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Kostka, Genia & Zhou, Hui, 2026. "Emotional attachment to AI chatbots: Evidence from Germany, China, South Africa, and the United States," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:87:y:2026:i:c:s0160791x26001685
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103379
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X26001685
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103379?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:87:y:2026:i:c:s0160791x26001685. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.