IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v77y2024ics0160791x24001039.html

How can generative AI help in different parts of research? An experiment study on smart cities’ definitions and characteristics

Author

Listed:
  • Dashkevych, Oleg
  • Portnov, Boris A.

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) engines, such as ChatGPT, InferKit, and DeepAI, are very popular today and new AI engines, such as Google Bard, Chinchilla AI DeepMind, and GPT-4, constantly emerge. However, question remains how these new data management tools can assist scholars in improving the research design and implementation. In an attempt to answer this question, we focus on one particular research field – definition and identification of smart cities (SCs), – and compare the answers provided by different AI engines with the answers given in a sequence of research papers, prepared without the use of AI and recently published by these authors. In particular, the following aspects of the original studies were re-analysed here using the AI input: a) problem definition; b) summary of current knowledge; c) identification of unknowns; d) research strategy, and e) recommendations for research and practice. As the study reveals, the recommendations of AI engines are, at times, inconsistent and data sources cited are often inaccurate. However, as such engines scan multiple open sources and retrieve relevant information, they can help to bridge gaps in the summary of background studies and streamline the research design, by supplementing missing or overlooked information.

Suggested Citation

  • Dashkevych, Oleg & Portnov, Boris A., 2024. "How can generative AI help in different parts of research? An experiment study on smart cities’ definitions and characteristics," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:77:y:2024:i:c:s0160791x24001039
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102555
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X24001039
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102555?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amany Elbanna & Yogesh Dwivedi & Deborah Bunker & David Wastell, 2020. "The Search for Smartness in Working, Living and Organising: Beyond the ‘Technomagic’," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 275-280, April.
    2. Nishant, Rohit & Kennedy, Mike & Corbett, Jacqueline, 2020. "Artificial intelligence for sustainability: Challenges, opportunities, and a research agenda," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    3. Dirk Helbing & Farzam Fanitabasi & Fosca Giannotti & Regula Hänggli & Carina I. Hausladen & Jeroen van den Hoven & Sachit Mahajan & Dino Pedreschi & Evangelos Pournaras, 2021. "Ethics of Smart Cities: Towards Value-Sensitive Design and Co-Evolving City Life," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-25, October.
    4. Dashkevych, Oleg & Portnov, Boris A., 2023. "Human-centric, sustainability-driven approach to ranking smart cities worldwide," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    5. Oleg Dashkevych & Boris A. Portnov, 2022. "Criteria for Smart City Identification: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-34, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Teng, Qiuling & Bai, Xiaoyu & Apuke, Oberiri Destiny, 2024. "Modelling the factors that affect the intention to adopt emerging digital technologies for a sustainable smart world city," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    2. Thomas, Llewellyn D.W. & Romasanta, Angelo Kenneth G. & Pujol Priego, Laia, 2026. "Jagged competencies: Measuring the reliability of generative AI in academic research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    3. Zhao, Xuefeng & Wu, Weiwei & Wu, Delin, 2024. "How does AI perform in industry chain? A patent claims analysis approach," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ifeyinwa Juliet Orji & Chukwuebuka Martinjoe U-Dominic, 2026. "The effect of supply chain learning in mitigating the challenges to adopting artificial intelligence for supply chain sustainability," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 358(3), pages 1561-1602, March.
    2. Amit Kumar Kushwaha & Arpan Kumar Kar, 2024. "MarkBot – A Language Model-Driven Chatbot for Interactive Marketing in Post-Modern World," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 857-874, June.
    3. Germán López Pérez & Isabel María García Sánchez & José Luis Zafra Gómez, 2024. "A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis of eco‐innovation on financial performance: Identifying barriers and drivers," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 1321-1340, February.
    4. Abdelhamid Zaidi & Samuel-Soma M. Ajibade & Majd Musa & Festus Victor Bekun, 2023. "New Insights into the Research Landscape on the Application of Artificial Intelligence in Sustainable Smart Cities: A Bibliometric Mapping and Network Analysis Approach," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(4), pages 287-299, July.
    5. Kim, Myung Ja & Hall, C. Michael & Kwon, Ohbyung & Sohn, Kwonsang, 2024. "Space tourism: Value-attitude-behavior theory, artificial intelligence, and sustainability," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    6. Naz Onel & Leila Elgaaied-Gambier & Sara Baskentli & Estelle Van Tonder, 2025. "From algorithms to ecosystems: A transformative consumer research perspective on artificial intelligence for sustainable living," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 15(3), pages 390-415, December.
    7. Alper Ozpinar, 2023. "A Hyper-Integrated Mobility as a Service (MaaS) to Gamification and Carbon Market Enterprise Architecture Framework for Sustainable Environment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-22, March.
    8. Mohammadreza Akbari & John L. Hopkins, 2022. "Digital technologies as enablers of supply chain sustainability in an emerging economy," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 689-710, December.
    9. Lv, David & Cho, Erin, 2025. "The unseen carbon cost of AI workforce: A behavioral theory perspective of environmental scalability," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 68(6), pages 759-776.
    10. Chițu Florentina & Mecu Andra-Nicoleta & Marin Georgiana-Ionela, 2024. "Exploring the Climate Change-AI Nexus: A Bibliometric and Scientometric Study," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 18(1), pages 1658-1670.
    11. Expósito, Alfonso & Díez Cebollero, Esther, 2025. "How the digital revolution is reshaping water management and policy: A focus on Spain," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    12. Inese Mavlutova & Dzintra Atstaja & Janis Grasis & Jekaterina Kuzmina & Inga Uvarova & Dagnija Roga, 2023. "Urban Transportation Concept and Sustainable Urban Mobility in Smart Cities: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-16, April.
    13. Qin, Min & Qiu, Shanshan & Mou, Jian, 2025. "Task supported or task decision-making? Which AI workplace enhances employee AI identity more in manufacturing enterprise," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    14. Noura Metawa & Rhada Boujlil & Saad Alsunbul, 2023. "Fraud-Free Green Finance: Using Deep Learning to Preserve the Integrity of Financial Statements for Enhanced Capital Market Sustainability," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(6), pages 610-617, November.
    15. Julia Schwaeke & Carolin Gerlich & Hong Linh Nguyen & Dominik K. Kanbach & Johanna Gast, 2025. "Artificial intelligence (AI) for good? Enabling organizational change towards sustainability," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 19(10), pages 3013-3038, October.
    16. Walter Leal Filho & João Henrique Paulino Pires Eustachio & Lucas Veiga Ávila & Maria Alzira Pimenta Dinis & Paula M. Hernandez‐Diaz & Karina Batista & Bruno Borsari & Ismaila Rimi Abubakar, 2025. "Enhancing the contribution of higher education institutions to sustainable development research: A focus on post‐2015 SDGs," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(2), pages 1745-1757, April.
    17. Mao, Qian & Li, Yilong, 2024. "Blockchain evolution, artificial intelligence and ferrous metal trade," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    18. He, Tingting & Xie, Haonan & Goh, Hui Hwang & Liang, Xue & Yew, Weng Kean & Zhang, Dongdong & Dai, Wei & Kurniawan, Tonni Agustiono & Lim, Yun Seng & Wong, Hin Yong & Islam, Mohammad Tariqul, 2025. "Advanced sensing and holistic perception technologies for new-type power systems: A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    19. Zhong, Kai & Song, Liangrong, 2025. "Artificial intelligence adoption and corporate green innovation capability," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    20. Chen, Yuhang & Zhong, Yilin & Xu, Feng & Zhang, Qinghua, 2025. "Driving environmental, social, and governance excellence: The direct and indirect effects of intelligent transformation," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 313-331.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:77:y:2024:i:c:s0160791x24001039. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.