IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v67y2021ics0160791x21002438.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Affordable housing and clean technology transfer in construction firms in Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Cubillos-González, Rolando-Arturo
  • Cardoso, Grace Tibério

Abstract

The affordable housing deficit in Brazil is 5.6 million homes. The Main Brazilian housing government program was called “Minha Casa, Minha Vida” from 2009 to 2020. It had little progress in the housing sustainability requirements in the last ten years. For that reason, construction industry has very little changed in terms of innovation. However, this sector has maintained standard production on a large scale. So, the crucial change could become from companies. The clean technology transfer is limited in the Brazilian affordable housing firms. One solution is to analyse this transfer process like a network. Then, it will be possible to evaluate the technological adaptability of these kinds of construction firms. This research aimed to estimate the clean technology transfer between construction firms in Brazil dedicated to building affordable housing. For this, it was identified the 69 construction firms in five cities of Rio Grande do Sul. The cities were Canoas, Caxias do Sul, Passo Fundo, Pelotas, Porto Alegre. Then, a network analysis identified the degree, betweenness, closeness, and density. These studies identify poor performance versus sustainability needs of current low-cost construction. As a result, it identifies the technology transfer capabilities that allow medium-term gains for Brazilian construction firms. Finally, we developed technology transfer indicators to understand the complexity of affordable housing production in Brazil.

Suggested Citation

  • Cubillos-González, Rolando-Arturo & Cardoso, Grace Tibério, 2021. "Affordable housing and clean technology transfer in construction firms in Brazil," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:67:y:2021:i:c:s0160791x21002438
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101768
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X21002438
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101768?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chi, Y. & Walsh, E. & Wang, T. & Shi, H. & Babakina, O. & Pennock, A. & Graedel, T.E., 2006. "Case studies in quantitative urban sustainability," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 105-123.
    2. Bugliarello, George, 2006. "Urban sustainability: Dilemmas, challenges and paradigms," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 19-26.
    3. Wang, Mengmeng & Zhou, Tao & Wang, Di, 2020. "Tracking the evolution processes of smart cities in China by assessing performance and efficiency," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    4. Nora Ruth Libertun de Duren, 2018. "The social housing burden: comparing households at the periphery and the centre of cities in Brazil, Colombia, and Mexico," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 177-203, April.
    5. Nora Ruth Libertun de Duren, 2018. "The social housing burden: comparing households at the periphery and the centre of cities in Brazil, Colombia, and Mexico," European Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 177-203, April.
    6. Dalbem, Renata & Grala da Cunha, Eduardo & Vicente, Romeu & Figueiredo, Antonio & Oliveira, Rui & Silva, Antonio César Silveira Baptista da, 2019. "Optimisation of a social housing for south of Brazil: From basic performance standard to passive house concept," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 1278-1296.
    7. Argun, Irem Duzdar & Kayakutlu, Gulgun & Ozgozen, Neslihan Yilmaz & Daim, Tugrul U., 2021. "Models for Energy Efficiency Obligation Systems through different perspectives," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    8. Carlos Hemais & Henrique Barros & Elizabeth Rosa, 2005. "Technology Competitiveness in Emerging Markets: The Case of the Brazilian Polymer Industry," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 303-314, July.
    9. Bodach, Susanne & Hamhaber, J., 2010. "Energy efficiency in social housing: Opportunities and barriers from a case study in Brazil," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(12), pages 7898-7910, December.
    10. Widera, Barbara, 2021. "Comparative analysis of user comfort and thermal performance of six types of vernacular dwellings as the first step towards climate resilient, sustainable and bioclimatic architecture in western sub-S," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    11. Luisa Felix Dalla Vecchia & Branko Kolarevic, 2020. "Mass Customization for Social Housing in Evolving Neighborhoods in Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-19, October.
    12. Maria Mrówczyńska & Małgorzata Sztubecka & Marta Skiba & Anna Bazan-Krzywoszańska & Przemysław Bejga, 2019. "The Use of Artificial Intelligence as a Tool Supporting Sustainable Development Local Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-17, August.
    13. Triana, Maria Andrea & Lamberts, Roberto & Sassi, Paola, 2015. "Characterisation of representative building typologies for social housing projects in Brazil and its energy performance," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 524-541.
    14. Leidl, Chantelle M. & David Lubitz, W., 2009. "Comparing domestic water heating technologies," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 244-256.
    15. Mrówczyńska, M. & Skiba, M. & Sztubecka, M. & Bazan-Krzywoszańska, A. & Kazak, J.K. & Gajownik, P., 2021. "Scenarios as a tool supporting decisions in urban energy policy: The analysis using fuzzy logic, multi-criteria analysis and GIS tools," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sonmezturk Bolatan, Gulin Idil & Giadedi, Abdulhakim & Daim, Tugrul, 2022. "Innovation leadership through technology transfer: Case of Turkish industry," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Erick Guerra & Shengxiao Li & Ariadna Reyes, 2022. "How do low-income commuters get to work in US and Mexican cities? A comparative empirical assessment," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(1), pages 75-96, January.
    2. Ivan Turok & Andreas Scheba & Justin Visagie, 2022. "Can social housing help to integrate divided cities? [Segregation and the urban rich; enclaves, networks and mobilities]," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 15(1), pages 93-116.
    3. Paavo Monkkonen, 2019. "Empty houses across North America: Housing finance and Mexico’s vacancy crisis," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(10), pages 2075-2091, August.
    4. Schlör, Holger & Venghaus, Sandra & Hake, Jürgen-Friedrich, 2018. "The FEW-Nexus city index – Measuring urban resilience," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 382-392.
    5. Ünal, Berat Berkan & Onaygil, Sermin & Acuner, Ebru & Cin, Rabia, 2022. "Application of energy efficiency obligation scheme for electricity distribution companies in Turkey," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    6. Agnieszka Jaszczak & Ewelina Pochodyła & Katarina Kristianova & Natalia Małkowska & Jan K. Kazak, 2021. "Redefinition of Park Design Criteria as a Result of Analysis of Well-Being and Soundscape: The Case Study of the Kortowo Park (Poland)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-22, March.
    7. Triana, Maria Andrea & Lamberts, Roberto & Sassi, Paola, 2015. "Characterisation of representative building typologies for social housing projects in Brazil and its energy performance," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 524-541.
    8. Chien, Fengsheng & Anwar, Ahsan & Hsu, Ching-Chi & Sharif, Arshian & Razzaq, Asif & Sinha, Avik, 2021. "The role of information and communication technology in encountering environmental degradation: Proposing an SDG framework for the BRICS countries," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    9. Sabina Kordana-Obuch & Michał Wojtoń & Mariusz Starzec & Beata Piotrowska, 2023. "Opportunities and Challenges for Research on Heat Recovery from Wastewater: Bibliometric and Strategic Analyses," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-36, September.
    10. Giacomo Di Foggia & Massimo Beccarello & Marco Borgarello & Francesca Bazzocchi & Stefano Moscarelli, 2022. "Market-Based Instruments to Promote Energy Efficiency: Insights from the Italian Case," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-16, October.
    11. Plappally, A.K. & Lienhard V, J.H., 2012. "Energy requirements for water production, treatment, end use, reclamation, and disposal," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(7), pages 4818-4848.
    12. Larissa Diana Michelam & Tatiana Tucunduva Philippi Cortese & Tan Yigitcanlar & Ana Cristina Fachinelli & Leonardo Vils & Wilson Levy, 2021. "Leveraging Smart and Sustainable Development via International Events: Insights from Bento Gonçalves Knowledge Cities World Summit," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-27, September.
    13. repec:lib:000cis:v:5:y:2017:i:1:p:26-34 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Andrzej Greinert & Maria Mrówczyńska, 2020. "The Impact of the Process of Academic Education on Differences in Landscape Perception between the Students of Environmental Engineering and Civil Engineering," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-27, June.
    15. Miro Ristimäki & Seppo Junnila, 2015. "Sustainable Urban Development Calls for Responsibility through Life Cycle Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-25, September.
    16. Nasrollahi, Maedeh & Ghadikolaei, Abdolhamid Safaei & Ghasemi, Rohollah & Sheykhizadeh, Morteza & Abdi, Mehdi, 2022. "Identification and prioritization of connected vehicle technologies for sustainable development in Iran," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    17. De Moortel, Kevin & Crispeels, Thomas, 2018. "International university-university technology transfer: Strategic management framework," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 145-155.
    18. Perperidis, Giannis, 2023. "The politics of the city: Critical theory of technology and urban design(s)," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    19. Leticia dos Santos Benso Maciel & Benedito Donizeti Bonatto & Hector Arango & Lucas Gustavo Arango, 2020. "Evaluating Public Policies for Fair Social Tariffs of Electricity in Brazil by Using an Economic Market Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-20, September.
    20. Atefeh Tamaskani Esfehankalateh & Mohammad Farrokhzad & Faezeh Tamaskani Esfehankalateh & Farzaneh Soflaei, 2022. "Bioclimatic passive design strategies of traditional houses in cold climate regions," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(8), pages 10027-10068, August.
    21. Liyuan Liu & Yen Hsu, 2022. "Motivating factors behind the public’s use of smart recycling systems: perceived playfulness and environmental concern," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-13, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:67:y:2021:i:c:s0160791x21002438. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.