IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v43y2015icp231-239.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technological challenges for effective development towards sustainable waste management in developing countries: Case study of Bangkok, Thailand

Author

Listed:
  • Sukholthaman, Pitchayanin
  • Shirahada, Kunio

Abstract

One of the consequences of rapid urbanization and a growing population is an increasing amount of municipal solid waste. Cities around the world have been facing the same global waste management dilemma. The increasing amount of waste has created the needs for an effective management system that provides reliable service, as the current systems in place are failing to respond to the demand. From the service perspective, waste management is an environmental public service. Applying appropriate technology is considered a potential solution to increase waste management performance. Therefore, in this paper, technological challenges are studied as a potential way to alleviate the impacts of ineffective waste management services. The success factors to overcome technological gaps which can be occurred along management chain are identified on the basis of service concept. Bangkok is selected as an urban city in a developing country that is experiencing problems caused by ineffective waste management services. The research methods used for obtaining and analyzing data include questionnaire surveys, interviews, and literature reviews. In addition to problems with waste collection and waste transportation services, a key factor contributing to ineffective waste management is lack of participation from local residents. In this paper, ways of increasing the effectiveness of waste management services are proposed, success factors to overcome technological challenges are identified, and the implications of these challenges are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Sukholthaman, Pitchayanin & Shirahada, Kunio, 2015. "Technological challenges for effective development towards sustainable waste management in developing countries: Case study of Bangkok, Thailand," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 231-239.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:43:y:2015:i:c:p:231-239
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2015.05.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X15000433
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2015.05.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shirahada, Kunio & Hamazaki, Kazuma, 2013. "Trial and error mindset of R&D personnel and its relationship to organizational creative climate," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 80(6), pages 1108-1118.
    2. Chi, Y. & Walsh, E. & Wang, T. & Shi, H. & Babakina, O. & Pennock, A. & Graedel, T.E., 2006. "Case studies in quantitative urban sustainability," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 105-123.
    3. Durant, Darrin, 2009. "Responsible action and nuclear waste disposal," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 150-157.
    4. Fritz, Jack J. & Vollmer, Derek, 2006. "To what extent can technology compensate for institutional failure in an urban environmental management setting: The case of China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 95-104.
    5. Sudhir, V. & Muraleedharan, V. R. & Srinivasan, G., 1996. "Integrated solid waste management in Urban India: A critical operational research framework," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 163-181, September.
    6. Walsh, E. & Babakina, O. & Pennock, A. & Shi, H. & Chi, Y. & Wang, T. & Graedel, T.E., 2006. "Quantitative guidelines for urban sustainability," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 45-61.
    7. Sorensen, Ingrid M. & McBean, Edward A., 2015. "Beyond appropriate technology: Social considerations for the sustainable use of Arsenic–Iron Removal Plants in rural Bangladesh," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 1-9.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Emmanuel Kazuva & Jiquan Zhang, 2019. "Analyzing Municipal Solid Waste Treatment Scenarios in Rapidly Urbanizing Cities in Developing Countries: The Case of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-21, June.
    2. Salinda Sedtha & Vilas Nitivattananon & Mokbul Morshed Ahmad & Simon Guerrero Cruz, 2022. "The First Step of Single-Use Plastics Reduction in Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Hridoy Roy & Samiha Raisa Alam & Rayhan Bin-Masud & Tonima Rahman Prantika & Md. Nahid Pervez & Md. Shahinoor Islam & Vincenzo Naddeo, 2022. "A Review on Characteristics, Techniques, and Waste-to-Energy Aspects of Municipal Solid Waste Management: Bangladesh Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-25, August.
    4. Seker, Sukran, 2022. "IoT based sustainable smart waste management system evaluation using MCDM model under interval-valued q-rung orthopair fuzzy environment," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schlör, Holger & Venghaus, Sandra & Hake, Jürgen-Friedrich, 2018. "The FEW-Nexus city index – Measuring urban resilience," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 382-392.
    2. Junmin Lee & Keungoui Kim & Hyunha Shin & Junseok Hwang, 2018. "Acceptance Factors of Appropriate Technology: Case of Water Purification Systems in Binh Dinh, Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-20, June.
    3. Zhang, Xiaohong & Wu, Liqian & Zhang, Rong & Deng, Shihuai & Zhang, Yanzong & Wu, Jun & Li, Yuanwei & Lin, Lili & Li, Li & Wang, Yinjun & Wang, Lilin, 2013. "Evaluating the relationships among economic growth, energy consumption, air emissions and air environmental protection investment in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 18(C), pages 259-270.
    4. Madhushree Sekher, 2002. "Tackling Society’s ‘Detritus’: Stakeholder Partnerships and Urban Service Delivery In India," Working Papers 101, Institute for Social and Economic Change, Bangalore.
    5. Gabriella D’Amore & Maria Testa & Luigi Lepore, 2023. "How Is the Utilities Sector Contributing to Building a Sustainable Future? A Systematic Literature Review of Sustainability Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-19, December.
    6. Cubillos-González, Rolando-Arturo & Cardoso, Grace Tibério, 2021. "Affordable housing and clean technology transfer in construction firms in Brazil," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    7. van Beukering, Pieter J.H. & van den Bergh, Jeroen C.J.M., 2006. "Modelling and analysis of international recycling between developed and developing countries," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 1-26.
    8. Schoot Uiterkamp, Bob Jan & Azadi, Hossein & Ho, Peter, 2011. "Sustainable recycling model: A comparative analysis between India and Tanzania," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 55(3), pages 344-355.
    9. Mario Piacentini, 2012. "Rationale and policies for the green growth of cities and regional economies," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 9(2), pages 129-146, June.
    10. Binder, Claudia R. & Mosler, Hans-Joachim, 2007. "Waste-resource flows of short-lived goods in households of Santiago de Cuba," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 265-283.
    11. Li Li & Xinwen Bai & Yiyong Zhou, 2023. "A Social Resources Perspective of Employee Innovative Behavior and Outcomes: A Moderated Mediation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-19, February.
    12. Anupama Singh & Papia Raj, 2019. "Sustainable recycling model for municipal solid waste in Patna," Energy & Environment, , vol. 30(2), pages 212-234, March.
    13. He, Bao-jie & Ye, Miao & Yang, Li & Fu, Xiang-Ping & Mou, Ben & Griffy-Brown, Charla, 2014. "The combination of digital technology and architectural design to develop a process for enhancing energy-saving: The case of Maanshan China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 77-87.
    14. Zhang, XiaoHong & Hu, He & Zhang, Rong & Deng, ShiHuai, 2014. "Interactions between China׳s economy, energy and the air emissions and their policy implications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 624-638.
    15. Fan-Chuan Tseng & Mu-Hsuan Huang & Dar-Zen Chen, 2020. "Factors of university–industry collaboration affecting university innovation performance," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(2), pages 560-577, April.
    16. White, Leroy & Smith, Honora & Currie, Christine, 2011. "OR in developing countries: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 208(1), pages 1-11, January.
    17. Efpraxia D. Zamani & Nancy Pouloudi & George M. Giaglis & Jonathan Wareham, 2022. "Appropriating Information Technology Artefacts through Trial and Error: The Case of the Tablet," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 97-119, February.
    18. Winter, Scott R. & Crouse, Sean R. & Rice, Stephen, 2021. "The development of ‘green’ airports: Which factors influence willingness to pay for sustainability and intention to act? A structural and mediation model analysis," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    19. Ramana, M.V., 2013. "Shifting strategies and precarious progress: Nuclear waste management in Canada," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 196-206.
    20. Juan Tang & Hong-lin Zhu & Zhi Liu & Fu Jia & Xiao-xue Zheng, 2019. "Urban Sustainability Evaluation under the Modified TOPSIS Based on Grey Relational Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-21, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:43:y:2015:i:c:p:231-239. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.