IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/streco/v58y2021icp14-22.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An economic mechanism of industrial ecology: Theory and evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Yu, Xiang
  • Zhang, Yongsheng

Abstract

Industrial ecology, as a multidiscipline, represents an innovative approach that incorporates science, engineering, and social sciences in the research on how industrial systems should operate to achieving sustainable development. Currently, scientists and engineers play a dominant role in this field, while economic analysis is to some extent absent.. This paper provides a formalized economic theory, by employing a general equilibrium model, to investigate the economic mechanism of industrial ecology. Though all wastes are technically useful and could be reused as a resource input, whether a waste could be turned into ‘gold’ depends upon if its reuse is cost-effective. Therefore, the structure with full reuse of wastes is not necessarily more Pareto optimal than the structures without reuse in some cases. As the focus of the theory, we investigate the industrial parks in China to explain why industrial ecology works well in some cases and further explore its policy implications. The paper concludes with the suggestion that, as a transdisciplinary subject, industrial ecology could become more promising - both in theory and practice - if its economic foundation is further consolidated.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu, Xiang & Zhang, Yongsheng, 2021. "An economic mechanism of industrial ecology: Theory and evidence," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 14-22.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:streco:v:58:y:2021:i:c:p:14-22
    DOI: 10.1016/j.strueco.2021.03.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0954349X21000308
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.strueco.2021.03.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dzeraviaha, Ihar, 2018. "Mainstream economics toolkit within the ecological economics framework," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 15-21.
    2. Yafei Wang, 2017. "An industrial ecology virtual framework for policy making in China," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 252-274, April.
    3. Wagner, Alfred, 1891. "Marshall's Principles of Economics," History of Economic Thought Articles, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, vol. 5, pages 319-338.
    4. Czech, Brian, 2009. "The neoclassical production function as a relic of anti-George politics: Implications for ecological economics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(8-9), pages 2193-2197, June.
    5. Junming Zhu, 2020. "Suggested use? On evidence‐based decision‐making in industrial ecology and beyond," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(5), pages 943-950, October.
    6. Karl-Heinz Erb & Thomas Kastner & Sebastiaan Luyssaert & Richard A. Houghton & Tobias Kuemmerle & Pontus Olofsson & Helmut Haberl, 2013. "Bias in the attribution of forest carbon sinks," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 3(10), pages 854-856, October.
    7. Siti Nuryanah & Sardar M. N. Islam, 2015. "Conceptual Framework and Research Methodology," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Corporate Governance and Financial Management, chapter 3, pages 63-102, Palgrave Macmillan.
    8. John Ehrenfeld & Nicholas Gertler, 1997. "Industrial Ecology in Practice: The Evolution of Interdependence at Kalundborg," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 1(1), pages 67-79, January.
    9. Edward J Manderson & Timothy J Considine, 2018. "An Economic Perspective on Industrial Ecology," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 12(2), pages 304-323.
    10. Iddo K. Wernick & Paul E. Waggoner & Jesse H. Ausubel, 1997. "Searching for Leverage to Conserve Forests: The Industrial Ecology of Wood Products in the United States," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 1(3), pages 125-145, July.
    11. Stefan Pauliuk & Anders Arvesen & Konstantin Stadler & Edgar G. Hertwich, 2017. "Industrial ecology in integrated assessment models," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 7(1), pages 13-20, January.
    12. Xuemei Bai & Peijun Shi & Yansui Liu, 2014. "Society: Realizing China's urban dream," Nature, Nature, vol. 509(7499), pages 158-160, May.
    13. Stephen H. Levine, 2003. "Comparing Products and Production in Ecological and Industrial Systems," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 7(2), pages 33-42, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rizzati, Massimiliano & Landoni, Matteo, 2024. "A systematic review of agent-based modelling in the circular economy: Insights towards a general model," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 617-631.
    2. Lauri Alkki & Jarmo Uusikartano & Eeva L. Pohls & Sami Rusthollkarhu & Leena Aarikka‐Stenroos, 2024. "Unfolding the human–material interaction of material flows in societies: DNA as a conceptual metaphor," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 28(2), pages 339-354, April.
    3. Yilun He & Shaowen Zhan & Noshaba Aziz, 2023. "Quantifying the Contribution of Rural Residents’ Participation in the Cultural Tourism Industry to Improve the Soil Erosion Control Effect in Ecologically Fragile Areas: A Case Study in the Shaanxi–Ga," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thomas Wiedmann, 2017. "An input–output virtual laboratory in practice – survey of uptake, usage and applications of the first operational IELab," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 296-312, April.
    2. Ghodeswar, Archana & Oliver, Matthew E., 2022. "Trading one waste for another? Unintended consequences of fly ash reuse in the Indian electric power sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    3. Joris Baars & Mohammad Ali Rajaeifar & Oliver Heidrich, 2022. "Quo vadis MFA? Integrated material flow analysis to support material efficiency," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(4), pages 1487-1503, August.
    4. Beckamp, Marius, 2021. "Industriesymbiosen als Ansatz regionaler Kreislaufwirtschaft: Begriffsklärung & strukturpolitische Potentiale," Forschung Aktuell 08/2021, Institut Arbeit und Technik (IAT), Westfälische Hochschule, University of Applied Sciences.
    5. Yariv, Leeat & Jackson, Matthew O., 2018. "The Non-Existence of Representative Agents," CEPR Discussion Papers 13397, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    6. SAITO Yukiko, 2013. "Role of Hub Firms in Geographical Transaction Network," Discussion papers 13080, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    7. Emanuela Marrocu & Raffaele Paci & Stefano Usai, 2013. "Productivity Growth In The Old And New Europe: The Role Of Agglomeration Externalities," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(3), pages 418-442, August.
    8. Kristien Werck & Bruno Heyndels & Benny Geys, 2008. "The impact of ‘central places’ on spatial spending patterns: evidence from Flemish local government cultural expenditures," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 32(1), pages 35-58, March.
    9. Giulia Faggio & Olmo Silva & William C Strange, 2020. "Tales of the city: what do agglomeration cases tell us about agglomeration in general? [The anchor tenant hypothesis: exploring the role of large, local, R&D-intensive firms in regional innovation ," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 20(5), pages 1117-1143.
    10. Paola Tubaro, 2009. "Is individual rationality essential to market price formation? The contribution of zero-intelligence agent trading models," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 1-19.
    11. H. W. Arndt, 1984. "Political Economy," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 60(3), pages 266-273, September.
    12. Colton Brehm & Astrid Layton, 2021. "Nestedness of eco‐industrial networks: Exploring linkage distribution to promote sustainable industrial growth," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(1), pages 205-218, February.
    13. Roberto Ganau & Andrés Rodríguez-Pose, 2022. "Does urban concentration matter for changes in country economic performance?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(6), pages 1275-1299, May.
    14. Amy Glasmeier, 2007. "Book Reviews," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(6), pages 867-870.
    15. Han, Feng & Ke, Shanzi, 2016. "The effects of factor proximity and market potential on urban manufacturing output," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 31-45.
    16. Diemer, Andreas & Regan, Tanner, 2022. "No inventor is an island: Social connectedness and the geography of knowledge flows in the US," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(2).
    17. Duranton, Gilles & Puga, Diego, 2014. "The Growth of Cities," Handbook of Economic Growth, in: Philippe Aghion & Steven Durlauf (ed.), Handbook of Economic Growth, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 5, pages 781-853, Elsevier.
    18. Otsuka, Akihiro, 2023. "Industrial electricity consumption efficiency and energy policy in Japan," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    19. Martin, Philippe & Mayer, Thierry & Mayneris, Florian, 2011. "Spatial concentration and plant-level productivity in France," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 182-195, March.
    20. Yener Altunbaş & Edward Jones & John Thornton, 2013. "Knowledge spillovers and the growth of British cities," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 162-166, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:streco:v:58:y:2021:i:c:p:14-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/525148 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.