IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v81y2011i5p618-625.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stability of L-statistics from weakly dependent observations

Author

Listed:
  • Kaluszka, Marek
  • Okolewski, Andrzej

Abstract

We study the stability of moments of L-estimates with respect to several types of weak dependencies motivated by different mixing concepts. An actuarial interpretation of the presented results is indicated.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaluszka, Marek & Okolewski, Andrzej, 2011. "Stability of L-statistics from weakly dependent observations," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 81(5), pages 618-625, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:81:y:2011:i:5:p:618-625
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-7152(10)00361-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Shaun, 1996. "Premium Calculation by Transforming the Layer Premium Density," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(1), pages 71-92, May.
    2. Kevin Dowd & John Cotter & Ghulam Sorwar, 2008. "Spectral Risk Measures: Properties and Limitations," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 34(1), pages 61-75, August.
    3. Acerbi, Carlo, 2002. "Spectral measures of risk: A coherent representation of subjective risk aversion," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(7), pages 1505-1518, July.
    4. Kaluszka, M. & Okolewski, A., 2001. "An extension of the Erdös-Neveu-Rényi theorem with applications to order statistics," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 181-186, November.
    5. Denuit, Michel & Dhaene, Jan & Ribas, Carmen, 2001. "Does positive dependence between individual risks increase stop-loss premiums?," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 305-308, June.
    6. Birkel, Thomas, 1992. "Laws of large numbers under dependence assumptions," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 14(5), pages 355-362, July.
    7. Kremer, Erhard, 1998. "Largest Claims Reinsurance Premiums under Possible Claims Dependence," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 28(2), pages 257-267, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Okolewski, A. & Kaluszka, M., 2015. "Stability of expected L-statistics against weak dependence of observations," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 157-164.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wächter, Hans Peter & Mazzoni, Thomas, 2013. "Consistent modeling of risk averse behavior with spectral risk measures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(2), pages 487-495.
    2. Soren Bettels & Sojung Kim & Stefan Weber, 2022. "Multinomial Backtesting of Distortion Risk Measures," Papers 2201.06319, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2024.
    3. Massimiliano Barbi & Silvia Romagnoli, 2016. "Optimal hedge ratio under a subjective re-weighting of the original measure," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(14), pages 1271-1280, March.
    4. Omid Momen & Akbar Esfahanipour & Abbas Seifi, 2020. "A robust behavioral portfolio selection: model with investor attitudes and biases," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 427-446, March.
    5. Kaluszka, M. & Laeven, R.J.A. & Okolewski, A., 2012. "A note on weighted premium calculation principles," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 379-381.
    6. Wolfgang Kürsten & Mario Brandtner, 2009. "Kohärente Risikomessung versus individuelle Akzeptanzmengen — Anmerkungen zum impliziten Risikoverständnis des “Conditional Value-at-Risk”," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 61(4), pages 358-381, June.
    7. Daouia, Abdelaati & Girard, Stéphane & Stupfler, Gilles, 2018. "Tail expectile process and risk assessment," TSE Working Papers 18-944, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    8. Dilip B. Madan & Yazid M. Sharaiha, 2015. "Option overlay strategies," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(7), pages 1175-1190, July.
    9. Brandtner, Mario, 2018. "Expected Shortfall, spectral risk measures, and the aggravating effect of background risk, or: risk vulnerability and the problem of subadditivity," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 138-149.
    10. Leili Javanmardi & Yuri Lawryshyn, 2016. "A new rank dependent utility approach to model risk averse preferences in portfolio optimization," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 237(1), pages 161-176, February.
    11. John A. Major & Stephen J. Mildenhall, 2020. "Pricing and Capital Allocation for Multiline Insurance Firms With Finite Assets in an Imperfect Market," Papers 2008.12427, arXiv.org.
    12. Fuchs Sebastian & Trutschnig Wolfgang, 2020. "On quantile based co-risk measures and their estimation," Dependence Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 396-416, January.
    13. Lima Miquelluti, Daniel & Ozaki, Vitor & Miquelluti, David J., 2020. "An application of geographically weighted quantile LASSO to weather index insurance design," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304288, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    14. Alexis Bonnet & Isabelle Nagot, 2005. "Methodology of measuring performance in alternative investment," Cahiers de la Maison des Sciences Economiques b05078, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1).
    15. Jungsywan H. Sepanski & Xiwen Wang, 2023. "New Classes of Distortion Risk Measures and Their Estimation," Risks, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-21, November.
    16. Zaks, Yaniv & Tsanakas, Andreas, 2014. "Optimal capital allocation in a hierarchical corporate structure," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 48-55.
    17. Boonen, Tim J., 2017. "Risk Redistribution Games With Dual Utilities," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 47(1), pages 303-329, January.
    18. Carole Bernard & Silvana M. Pesenti & Steven Vanduffel, 2022. "Robust Distortion Risk Measures," Papers 2205.08850, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2023.
    19. Okolewski, A. & Kaluszka, M., 2015. "Stability of expected L-statistics against weak dependence of observations," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 157-164.
    20. Girard, Stéphane & Stupfler, Gilles & Usseglio-Carleve, Antoine, 2022. "Functional estimation of extreme conditional expectiles," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 131-158.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:81:y:2011:i:5:p:618-625. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.