IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/spapps/v188y2025ics0304414925001310.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the particle approximation of lagged Feynman–Kac formulae

Author

Listed:
  • Awadelkarim, Elsiddig
  • Caffarel, Michel
  • Del Moral, Pierre
  • Jasra, Ajay

Abstract

In this paper we examine the numerical approximation of the limiting invariant measure associated with Feynman–Kac formulae. These are expressed in a discrete time formulation and are associated with a Markov chain and a potential function. The typical application considered here is the computation of eigenvalues associated with non-negative operators as found, for example, in physics or particle simulation of rare-events. We focus on a novel lagged approximation of this invariant measure, based upon the introduction of a ratio of time-averaged Feynman–Kac marginals associated with a positive operator iterated l∈N times; a lagged Feynman–Kac formula. This estimator and its approximation using Diffusion Monte Carlo (DMC) are commonly used in the physics literature. In short, DMC is an iterative algorithm involving N∈N particles or walkers simulated in parallel, that undergo sampling and resampling operations. In this work, it is shown that for the DMC approximation of the lagged Feynman–Kac formula, one has an almost sure characterization of the L1-error as the time parameter (iteration) goes to infinity and this is at most of O(exp{−κl}/N), for κ>0. In addition a non-asymptotic in time, and time uniform L1−bound is proved which is O(l/N). We also prove a novel central limit theorem to give a characterization of the exact asymptotic in time variance. This analysis demonstrates that the strategy used in physics, namely, to run DMC with N and l small and, for long time enough, is mathematically justified. Our results also suggest how one should choose N and l in practice. We emphasize that these results are not restricted to physical applications; they have broad relevance to the general problem of particle simulation of the Feynman–Kac formula, which is utilized in a great variety of scientific and engineering fields.

Suggested Citation

  • Awadelkarim, Elsiddig & Caffarel, Michel & Del Moral, Pierre & Jasra, Ajay, 2025. "On the particle approximation of lagged Feynman–Kac formulae," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:spapps:v:188:y:2025:i:c:s0304414925001310
    DOI: 10.1016/j.spa.2025.104690
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304414925001310
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.spa.2025.104690?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pierre Del Moral & Arnaud Doucet & Ajay Jasra, 2006. "Sequential Monte Carlo samplers," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 68(3), pages 411-436, June.
    2. Rudolf, Daniel & Schweizer, Nikolaus, 2015. "Error bounds of MCMC for functions with unbounded stationary variance," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 6-12.
    3. Nick Whiteley & Nikolas Kantas, 2017. "Calculating Principal Eigen-Functions of Non-Negative Integral Kernels: Particle Approximations and Applications," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 42(4), pages 1007-1034, November.
    4. Whiteley, Nick & Kantas, Nikolas & Jasra, Ajay, 2012. "Linear variance bounds for particle approximations of time-homogeneous Feynman–Kac formulae," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 122(4), pages 1840-1865.
    5. Jenny Li & Peter Winker, 2003. "Time Series Simulation with Quasi Monte Carlo Methods," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 21(1), pages 23-43, February.
    6. Beskos, Alexandros & Jasra, Ajay & Law, Kody & Tempone, Raul & Zhou, Yan, 2017. "Multilevel sequential Monte Carlo samplers," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 127(5), pages 1417-1440.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pierre E. Jacob & John O’Leary & Yves F. Atchadé, 2020. "Unbiased Markov chain Monte Carlo methods with couplings," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 82(3), pages 543-600, July.
    2. Millar, Robert & Li, Hui & Li, Jinglai, 2023. "Multicanonical sequential Monte Carlo sampler for uncertainty quantification," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    3. Warne, David J. & Baker, Ruth E. & Simpson, Matthew J., 2018. "Multilevel rejection sampling for approximate Bayesian computation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 71-86.
    4. Hai‐Dang Dau & Nicolas Chopin, 2022. "Waste‐free sequential Monte Carlo," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 84(1), pages 114-148, February.
    5. Ajay Jasra & Kody Law & Carina Suciu, 2020. "Advanced Multilevel Monte Carlo Methods," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 88(3), pages 548-579, December.
    6. James Martin & Ajay Jasra & Emma McCoy, 2013. "Inference for a class of partially observed point process models," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 65(3), pages 413-437, June.
    7. Okten, Giray & Eastman, Warren, 2004. "Randomized quasi-Monte Carlo methods in pricing securities," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 28(12), pages 2399-2426, December.
    8. Lee Anthony & Caron Francois & Doucet Arnaud & Holmes Chris, 2012. "Bayesian Sparsity-Path-Analysis of Genetic Association Signal using Generalized t Priors," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 11(2), pages 1-31, January.
    9. Nguyen, Hoang & Virbickaitė, Audronė, 2023. "Modeling stock-oil co-dependence with Dynamic Stochastic MIDAS Copula models," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    10. Naoki Awaya & Yasuhiro Omori, 2021. "Particle Rolling MCMC with Double-Block Sampling ," CIRJE F-Series CIRJE-F-1175, CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.
    11. Xiaohong Chen & Timothy M. Christensen & Elie Tamer, 2018. "Monte Carlo Confidence Sets for Identified Sets," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 86(6), pages 1965-2018, November.
    12. Dufays, Arnaud & Rombouts, Jeroen V.K., 2020. "Relevant parameter changes in structural break models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 217(1), pages 46-78.
    13. Nicolas Chopin & Mathieu Gerber, 2017. "Sequential quasi-Monte Carlo: Introduction for Non-Experts, Dimension Reduction, Application to Partly Observed Diffusion Processes," Working Papers 2017-35, Center for Research in Economics and Statistics.
    14. Cabral, Celso Rômulo Barbosa & Bolfarine, Heleno & Pereira, José Raimundo Gomes, 2008. "Bayesian density estimation using skew student-t-normal mixtures," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(12), pages 5075-5090, August.
    15. Fulop, Andras & Heng, Jeremy & Li, Junye & Liu, Hening, 2022. "Bayesian estimation of long-run risk models using sequential Monte Carlo," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 228(1), pages 62-84.
    16. Edward Herbst & Frank Schorfheide, 2014. "Sequential Monte Carlo Sampling For Dsge Models," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(7), pages 1073-1098, November.
    17. Owen Jamie & Wilkinson Darren J. & Gillespie Colin S., 2015. "Likelihood free inference for Markov processes: a comparison," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 14(2), pages 189-209, April.
    18. Maxime Lenormand & Franck Jabot & Guillaume Deffuant, 2013. "Adaptive approximate Bayesian computation for complex models," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 28(6), pages 2777-2796, December.
    19. Markku Lanne & Jani Luoto, 2018. "Data†Driven Identification Constraints for DSGE Models," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 80(2), pages 236-258, April.
    20. Christophe Andrieu & Arnaud Doucet & Roman Holenstein, 2010. "Particle Markov chain Monte Carlo methods," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 72(3), pages 269-342, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:spapps:v:188:y:2025:i:c:s0304414925001310. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/505572/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.