IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Using documents to investigate links between implementation and sustainability in a complex community intervention: The PRISM study

Listed author(s):
  • Willis, Karen
  • Small, Rhonda
  • Brown, Stephanie
Registered author(s):

    The increasing imperative to find what works in health services has meant a rise in research trialing interventions deemed ‘complex’. While the strength of these interventions comes from taking a ‘whole of problem’ approach using multiple and inter-linking strategies, ways of examining implementation are under-explored. Building sustainability is an important part of implementing complex intervention research, but this too has received little exploration in the implementation literature. This paper explores issues of implementation and sustainability by examining the case of PRISM (Program of Resources, Information and Support for Mothers), a community randomised trial in Victoria, Australia aimed at improving maternal health and wellbeing. It examines documents placed on the project website. Three groups of documents relating to implementation of the intervention were examined – implementation reports, media reports and community newsletters. Analysing these documents allowed a focus on the ‘work’ of the intervention – who does the work and what activities comprise the work – in order to examine implementation as it relates to sustainability. Document analysis provides a useful way of considering implementation and sustainability of complex intervention research. It can ‘value add’ to findings from process evaluation and extend our understanding of an intervention beyond outcome measures. Analysis of the documents in this case provides insights into why sustainability of an intervention may be difficult to achieve during implementation.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Elsevier in its journal Social Science & Medicine.

    Volume (Year): 75 (2012)
    Issue (Month): 7 ()
    Pages: 1222-1229

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:75:y:2012:i:7:p:1222-1229
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.05.025
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    Order Information: Postal:

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    in new window

    1. Roen, Katrina & Arai, Lisa & Roberts, Helen & Popay, Jennie, 2006. "Extending systematic reviews to include evidence on implementation: Methodological work on a review of community-based initiatives to prevent injuries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(4), pages 1060-1071, August.
    2. Hoddinott, Pat & Britten, Jane & Pill, Roisin, 2010. "Why do interventions work in some places and not others: A breastfeeding support group trial," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(5), pages 769-778, March.
    3. Bonetti, Debbie & Eccles, Martin & Johnston, Marie & Steen, Nick & Grimshaw, Jeremy & Baker, Rachel & Walker, Anne & Pitts, Nigel, 2005. "Guiding the design and selection of interventions to influence the implementation of evidence-based practice: an experimental simulation of a complex intervention trial," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(9), pages 2135-2147, May.
    4. Hawe, Penelope & Noort, Michelle & King, Lesley & Jordens, Christopher, 1997. "Multiplying Health Gains: the critical role of capacity-building within health promotion programs," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 29-42, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:75:y:2012:i:7:p:1222-1229. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.