IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v123y2014icp269-277.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

To whom do bureaucrats need to respond? Two faces of civil society in health policy

Author

Listed:
  • Lim, Seunghoo
  • Lee, Keon-Hyung
  • Suh, Hae Sun
  • Bae, Kwi-Hee

Abstract

The South Korean government implemented a law that separates the dispensing and prescribing (SDP) of drugs in July 2000. It was one of the most controversial issues in the Korean healthcare delivery system. Drawing on the conflict-cycle view and stakeholder analysis, which was used to examine how multiple stakeholders influenced this policymaking process, this study examines 1) the role of Korean civil society (i.e., civic and special interest groups) in SDP reform and 2) why SDP reform led to unintended consequences. We argue that bureaucrats in the Ministry of Health and Welfare (MoHW) should have played a central role in accommodating the public interest. Because they failed to do so, civic groups assumed major mediating and moderating roles. Due to the civic groups' lack of technical knowledge and professional experience, however, they played a limited role. In finalizing the proposal, therefore, bureaucrats were captured by strong interest groups, leading to unintended consequences, such as the increased use of non-covered services and higher healthcare expenditures. To ensure that the government serves the authentic public interest rather than special interest groups, bureaucrats should be responsible to the public rather than these interest groups. Moreover, civic groups should be strengthened (in relation to strongly organized interest groups) and included systematically in creating health policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Lim, Seunghoo & Lee, Keon-Hyung & Suh, Hae Sun & Bae, Kwi-Hee, 2014. "To whom do bureaucrats need to respond? Two faces of civil society in health policy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 269-277.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:123:y:2014:i:c:p:269-277
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.10.025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953614006716
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.10.025?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Randall S. Jones, 2010. "Health-Care Reform in Korea," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 797, OECD Publishing.
    2. Reich, Michael R., 1995. "The politics of health sector reform in developing countries: three cases of pharmaceutical policy," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(1-3), pages 47-77.
    3. Kang, Hye-Young & Park, Chong Yon & Joong Kim, Han, 2002. "Public attitude and knowledge on a new health policy for pharmaceutical care in Korea," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 195-209, November.
    4. Jeong, Hyoung-Sun, 2005. "Health care reform and change in public-private mix of financing: a Korean case," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(2), pages 133-145, October.
    5. Kwon, Soonman, 2003. "Pharmaceutical reform and physician strikes in Korea: separation of drug prescribing and dispensing," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 57(3), pages 529-538, August.
    6. Jeremy Hurst, 2010. "Effective Ways to Realise Policy Reforms in Health Systems," OECD Health Working Papers 51, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Franco-Trigo, L. & Fernandez-Llimos, F. & Martínez-Martínez, F. & Benrimoj, S.I. & Sabater-Hernández, D., 2020. "Stakeholder analysis in health innovation planning processes: A systematic scoping review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(10), pages 1083-1099.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lim, David & Emery, Jon & Lewis, Janice & Sunderland, V Bruce, 2009. "A systematic review of the literature comparing the practices of dispensing and non-dispensing doctors," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(1), pages 1-9, September.
    2. Young Suk Yoon & Boyoung Jung & Dongsu Kim & In-Hyuk Ha, 2019. "Factors Underlying Unmet Medical Needs: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-19, July.
    3. Collins, Charles & Green, Andrew & Hunter, David, 1999. "Health sector reform and the interpretation of policy context," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 69-83, April.
    4. Jeong, Hyoung-Sun, 2005. "Health care reform and change in public-private mix of financing: a Korean case," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(2), pages 133-145, October.
    5. Ben Greiner & Le Zhang & Chengxiang Tang, 2017. "Separation of prescription and treatment in health care markets: A laboratory experiment," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(S3), pages 21-35, December.
    6. Eunkyoung Kim & Soonman Kwon, 2021. "The effect of catastrophic health expenditure on exit from poverty among the poor in South Korea," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(2), pages 482-497, March.
    7. Matei, Ani & Savulescu, Carmen, 2010. "Socio-indicators related to social perception of reforms in the public health system.The romanian case," MPRA Paper 22968, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 29 May 2010.
    8. Feigl, Andrea B. & Ding, Eric L., 2013. "Evidenced Formal Coverage Index and universal healthcare enactment: A prospective longitudinal study of economic, social, and political predictors of 194 countries," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(1), pages 50-60.
    9. Pavitra Paul & Ulrich Nguemdjo & Armel Ngami & Natalia Kovtun & Bruno Ventelou, 2022. "Do efficiency and equity move together? Cross-dynamics of Health System performance and Universal Health Coverage," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-8, December.
    10. Kwon, Hye-Young & Hong, Ji-Min & Godman, Brian & Yang, Bong-Min, 2013. "Price cuts and drug spending in South Korea: The case of antihyperlipidemic agents," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(3), pages 217-226.
    11. Adam Wagstaff, 2007. "Health systems in East Asia: what can developing countries learn from Japan and the Asian Tigers?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(5), pages 441-456, May.
    12. Duran, Antonio & Kutzin, Joseph & Menabde, Nata, 2014. "Universal coverage challenges require health system approaches; the case of India," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(2), pages 269-277.
    13. Gonzalez Block, Miguel Angel, 1997. "Comparative research and analysis methods for shared learning from health system reforms," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 187-209, December.
    14. Gautier, Lara & Tosun, Jale & De Allegri, Manuela & Ridde, Valéry, 2018. "How do diffusion entrepreneurs spread policies? Insights from performance-based financing in Sub-Saharan Africa," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 160-175.
    15. Ardeshir Sepehri & Robert Chernomas, 2001. "Are user charges efficiency- and equity-enhancing? A critical review of economic literature with particular reference to experience from developing countries," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(2), pages 183-209.
    16. Cho, Mee-Hyun & Yoo, Ki-Bong & Lee, Hoo-Yeon & Lee, Kwang-Sig & Kwon, Jeoung A & Han, Kyu-Tae & Kim, Jae-Hyun & Park, Eun-Cheol, 2015. "The effect of new drug pricing systems and new reimbursement guidelines on pharmaceutical expenditures and prescribing behavior among hypertensive patients in Korea," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(5), pages 604-611.
    17. Sanggon Na & Soonman Kwon, 2015. "Building Systems for Universal Health Coverage in South Korea," Health, Nutrition and Population (HNP) Discussion Paper Series 98266, The World Bank.
    18. Jesse Bump & Susan Sparkes & Mehtap Tatar & Yusuf Celik & Meltem Aran & Claudia Rokx, 2014. "Turkey On The Way Of Universal Health Coverage Through The Health Transformation Program (2003-13)," Health, Nutrition and Population (HNP) Discussion Paper Series 93172, The World Bank.
    19. Horev, Tuvia & Babad, Yair M., 2005. "Healthcare reform implementation: stakeholders and their roles--the Israeli experience," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(1), pages 1-21, January.
    20. Liu, Ya-Ming & Yang, Yea-Huei Kao & Hsieh, Chee-Ruey, 2012. "Regulation and competition in the Taiwanese pharmaceutical market under national health insurance," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 471-483.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:123:y:2014:i:c:p:269-277. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.