IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/riibaf/v84y2026ics0275531926000243.html

A test of through-the-cycle ratings: Moody’s response to COVID-19

Author

Listed:
  • Malone, Lance
  • Smales, Lee A.
  • Liu, Zhangxin (Frank)

Abstract

We study the performance of through-the-cycle (TTC) credit ratings during the COVID-19 shock using sentiment analysis of 24,178 Moody’s rating reports issued 2012–2024. We document three findings. First, report sentiment collapsed in March 2020 while average rating levels remained essentially unchanged. Second, sentiment Granger-causes subsequent downgrades, leading formal rating actions by 1–2 months in normal periods and by 3–4 months during the pandemic. Third, credit spreads closely tracked sentiment rather than the sticky TTC ratings, with sentiment’s explanatory power for spread variation rising from approximately 10 % in “normal” years to 58 % in 2020–2021. These patterns show that, when shock permanence is uncertain, TTC methodology delays rating adjustments and shifts timely credit-risk information into narrative commentary. The evidence suggests value in hybrid rating systems that preserve TTC ratings for regulatory capital purposes while disclosing supplementary point-in-time indicators to reduce information frictions.

Suggested Citation

  • Malone, Lance & Smales, Lee A. & Liu, Zhangxin (Frank), 2026. "A test of through-the-cycle ratings: Moody’s response to COVID-19," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:riibaf:v:84:y:2026:i:c:s0275531926000243
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2026.103297
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0275531926000243
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ribaf.2026.103297?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G24 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Investment Banking; Venture Capital; Brokerage
    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill
    • G01 - Financial Economics - - General - - - Financial Crises

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:riibaf:v:84:y:2026:i:c:s0275531926000243. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ribaf .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.