IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reveco/v99y2025ics105905602500173x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Leveraging traditional financial asset protection methods for digital asset security

Author

Listed:
  • Xiao, Biyun
  • Lin, Su
  • Wu, Chunxiao
  • Sun, Boming

Abstract

The rise of the digital economy has highlighted the key role of digital assets in driving innovation and enhancing economic resilience. However, the volatility of digital assets requires effective value protection strategies to cope with market fluctuations. This study compares the performance of option-based portfolio insurance (OBPI) and constant-proportion portfolio insurance (CPPI) in managing digital asset volatility. By integrating Monte Carlo simulations, the research evaluates portfolio performance under different market conditions and incorporates fixed transaction costs to improve CPPI modeling. Based on the Hong Kong stock market, the analysis shows that CPPI outperforms OBPI in a bull market, but both strategies yield comparable results in a flat market. Conversely, OBPI provides superior downside protection during bear markets. This study contributes to the growing body of literature on digital asset value protection, emphasizing the importance of customized strategies in the digital economy to ensure the sustainable growth and stability of assets.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiao, Biyun & Lin, Su & Wu, Chunxiao & Sun, Boming, 2025. "Leveraging traditional financial asset protection methods for digital asset security," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:99:y:2025:i:c:s105905602500173x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2025.104010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105905602500173X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.iref.2025.104010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peterson, Richard E, 1974. "A Cross Section Study of the Demand for Money: The United States, 1960-62," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 29(1), pages 73-88, March.
    2. Marie Briere & Kim Oosterlinck & Ariane Szafarz, 2015. "Virtual Currency, Tangible Return: Portfolio Diversification with Bitcoins," Post-Print CEB, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles, vol. 16(6), pages 365-373.
    3. Changyu Hu & Yuetong Li & Xiaojia Zheng, 2022. "Data assets, information uses, and operational efficiency," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(60), pages 6887-6900, December.
    4. Annaert, Jan & Osselaer, Sofieke Van & Verstraete, Bert, 2009. "Performance evaluation of portfolio insurance strategies using stochastic dominance criteria," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 272-280, February.
    5. Cesari, Riccardo & Cremonini, David, 2003. "Benchmarking, portfolio insurance and technical analysis: a Monte Carlo comparison of dynamic strategies of asset allocation," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 987-1011, April.
    6. Khurana, Indu & Dutta, Dev K. & Singh Ghura, Amarpreet, 2022. "SMEs and digital transformation during a crisis: The emergence of resilience as a second-order dynamic capability in an entrepreneurial ecosystem," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 623-641.
    7. Libo Yin & Liyan Han, 2015. "Hedging International Foreign Exchange Risks via Option Based Portfolio Insurance," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 45(1), pages 151-181, January.
    8. Dima Tawil, 2018. "Risk-adjusted performance of portfolio insurance and investors’ preferences," Post-Print hal-02001769, HAL.
    9. Burggraf, Tobias, 2021. "Beyond risk parity – A machine learning-based hierarchical risk parity approach on cryptocurrencies," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 38(C).
    10. Ben Ameur, H. & Prigent, J.L., 2014. "Portfolio insurance: Gap risk under conditional multiples," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(1), pages 238-253.
    11. Pézier, Jacques & Scheller, Johanna, 2013. "Best portfolio insurance for long-term investment strategies in realistic conditions," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 263-274.
    12. Leland, Hayne E, 1980. "Who Should Buy Portfolio Insurance?," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 35(2), pages 581-594, May.
    13. Wu, Wei & Li, Zhuoran & Feng, Xuan, 2024. "International interest rate arbitrage: Study on a novel strategy," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(PB).
    14. Tawil, Dima, 2018. "Risk-adjusted performance of portfolio insurance and investors’ preferences," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 10-18.
    15. Douglas Cumming & Zachary Glatzer & Omrane Guedhami, 2023. "Institutions, digital assets, and implications for economic and financial performance," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 50(3), pages 487-513, September.
    16. John Fan Zhang & Zehuang Xu & Yi Peng & Wujin Yang & Haorou Zhao, 2022. "Culture, Digital Assets, and the Economy: A Trans-National Perspective," Springer Books, in: Thomas Walker & Frederick Davis & Tyler Schwartz (ed.), Big Data in Finance, pages 159-184, Springer.
    17. Rudi Zagst & Julia Kraus, 2011. "Stochastic dominance of portfolio insurance strategies," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 185(1), pages 75-103, May.
    18. Easley, David & O'Hara, Maureen & Basu, Soumya, 2019. "From mining to markets: The evolution of bitcoin transaction fees," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(1), pages 91-109.
    19. Black, Fischer & Scholes, Myron S, 1973. "The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 81(3), pages 637-654, May-June.
    20. Black, Fischer & Perold, AndreF., 1992. "Theory of constant proportion portfolio insurance," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 16(3-4), pages 403-426.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Raquel M. Gaspar & Paulo M. Silva, 2023. "Investors’ perspective on portfolio insurance," Portuguese Economic Journal, Springer;Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestao, vol. 22(1), pages 49-79, January.
    2. Sami Attaoui & Vincent Lacoste, 2013. "A scenario-based description of optimal American capital guaranteed strategies," Finance, Presses universitaires de Grenoble, vol. 34(2), pages 65-119.
    3. Peyman Alipour & Ali Foroush Bastani, 2023. "Value-at-Risk-Based Portfolio Insurance: Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking Against CPPI in a Markov-Modulated Regime-Switching Market," Papers 2305.12539, arXiv.org.
    4. Jacques Pézier & Johanna Scheller, 2011. "A Comprehensive Evaluation of Portfolio Insurance Strategies," ICMA Centre Discussion Papers in Finance icma-dp2011-15, Henley Business School, University of Reading.
    5. Pézier, Jacques & Scheller, Johanna, 2013. "Best portfolio insurance for long-term investment strategies in realistic conditions," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 263-274.
    6. Zhang, Tao & Zhou, Hongfeng & Li, Larry & Gu, Feng, 2015. "Optimal rebalance rules for the constant proportion portfolio insurance strategy – Evidence from China," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 413-422.
    7. Hamidi, Benjamin & Maillet, Bertrand & Prigent, Jean-Luc, 2014. "A dynamic autoregressive expectile for time-invariant portfolio protection strategies," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 1-29.
    8. Raquel M. Gaspar & Paulo M. Silva, 2019. "Investors’ Perspective on Portfolio InsuranceExpected Utility vs Prospect Theories," Working Papers REM 2019/92, ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics and Management, REM, Universidade de Lisboa.
    9. Raquel M. Gaspar, 2016. "On Path–dependency of Constant Proportion Portfolio Insurance strategies," EcoMod2016 9381, EcoMod.
    10. Lu, Richard & Horng, Tzyy-Leng & Horng, Min-Sun & Wang, Amy Z.-H., 2023. "A performance evaluation of portfolio insurance under the Black and Scholes framework: An application of the economic index of riskiness," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 269-276.
    11. Ko, Hyungjin & Son, Bumho & Lee, Jaewook, 2024. "Portfolio insurance strategy in the cryptocurrency market," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(PA).
    12. Zagst, Rudi & Kraus, Julia & Bertrand, Philippe, 2019. "Option-Based performance participation," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 44-61.
    13. Guohui Guan & Lin He & Zongxia Liang & Litian Zhang, 2024. "Optimal VPPI strategy under Omega ratio with stochastic benchmark," Papers 2403.13388, arXiv.org.
    14. Tawil, Dima, 2018. "Risk-adjusted performance of portfolio insurance and investors’ preferences," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 10-18.
    15. Bertrand, Philippe & Prigent, Jean-luc, 2011. "Omega performance measure and portfolio insurance," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(7), pages 1811-1823, July.
    16. Dichtl, Hubert & Drobetz, Wolfgang, 2011. "Portfolio insurance and prospect theory investors: Popularity and optimal design of capital protected financial products," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(7), pages 1683-1697, July.
    17. Ben Ameur, H. & Prigent, J.L., 2014. "Portfolio insurance: Gap risk under conditional multiples," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(1), pages 238-253.
    18. Olga Biedova & Victoria Steblovskaya, 2020. "Multiplier Optimization For Constant Proportion Portfolio Insurance (Cppi) Strategy," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(02), pages 1-22, March.
    19. Hubert Dichtl & Wolfgang Drobetz & Martin Wambach, 2017. "A bootstrap-based comparison of portfolio insurance strategies," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 31-59, January.
    20. Zieling, Daniel & Mahayni, Antje & Balder, Sven, 2014. "Performance evaluation of optimized portfolio insurance strategies," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 212-225.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:99:y:2025:i:c:s105905602500173x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620165 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.