IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v94y2018icp792-803.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optical simulation of a central receiver system: Comparison of different software tools

Author

Listed:
  • Jafrancesco, David
  • Cardoso, Joao P.
  • Mutuberria, Amaia
  • Leonardi, Erminia
  • Les, Iñigo
  • Sansoni, Paola
  • Francini, Franco
  • Fontani, Daniela

Abstract

Heliostat field layout design is a critical task in solar tower power plant construction due to its impact in the final plant efficiency and cost. The complexity of these systems and the high number of parameters to define during the field design stage demand the use of suitable simulation tools to compare different design options and evaluate the final performance of the heliostat field. This work concerns a comparison of some of the most common tools used for the heliostat field layout design and analysis, aiming to help Concentrating Solar Power researchers and industry by providing more information regarding the tools comparative results and features. A brief review of available tools is presented, including an extended description of some of them – Tonatiuh, SolTrace, TracePro and CRS4-2. A qualitative comparison of these four tools is performed focusing on functionality and usability. A quantitative comparison is done providing simulation results for a test-case, the SPSS-CRS facility located at Plataforma Solar de Almeria in Spain. In general, the results for total power and maximum irradiance are in good agreement across most tools. The total power values are very close for Tonatiuh, SolTrace and CRS4-2. Apart from the designer preferences, the choice of the most suitable tool depends on the specific application and requirements.

Suggested Citation

  • Jafrancesco, David & Cardoso, Joao P. & Mutuberria, Amaia & Leonardi, Erminia & Les, Iñigo & Sansoni, Paola & Francini, Franco & Fontani, Daniela, 2018. "Optical simulation of a central receiver system: Comparison of different software tools," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 792-803.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:94:y:2018:i:c:p:792-803
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.06.028
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032118304647
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2018.06.028?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yao, Zhihao & Wang, Zhifeng & Lu, Zhenwu & Wei, Xiudong, 2009. "Modeling and simulation of the pioneer 1MW solar thermal central receiver system in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(11), pages 2437-2446.
    2. Behar, Omar & Khellaf, Abdallah & Mohammedi, Kamal, 2013. "A review of studies on central receiver solar thermal power plants," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 12-39.
    3. Guiqiang, Li & Gang, Pei & Yuehong, Su & Jie, Ji & Riffat, Saffa B., 2013. "Experiment and simulation study on the flux distribution of lens-walled compound parabolic concentrator compared with mirror compound parabolic concentrator," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 398-403.
    4. Elisha B. Babatunde (ed.), 2012. "Solar Radiation," Books, IntechOpen, number 2039.
    5. Leonardi, Erminia & D’Aguanno, Bruno, 2011. "CRS4-2: A numerical code for the calculation of the solar power collected in a central receiver system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 4828-4837.
    6. Cruz, N.C. & Redondo, J.L. & Berenguel, M. & Álvarez, J.D. & Ortigosa, P.M., 2017. "Review of software for optical analyzing and optimizing heliostat fields," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 1001-1018.
    7. Collado, Francisco J. & Guallar, Jesús, 2012. "Campo: Generation of regular heliostat fields," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 49-59.
    8. Jafrancesco, D. & Sansoni, P. & Francini, F. & Fontani, D., 2016. "Strategy and criteria to optically design a solar concentration plant," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 1066-1073.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Serrano-Arrabal, J. & Serrano-Aguilera, J.J. & Sánchez-González, A., 2021. "Dual-tower CSP plants: optical assessment and optimization with a novel cone-tracing model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 429-442.
    2. Georgios E. Arnaoutakis & Dimitris Al. Katsaprakakis, 2021. "Concentrating Solar Power Advances in Geometric Optics, Materials and System Integration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-25, September.
    3. El-Samie, Mostafa M. Abd & Ju, Xing & Zhang, Zheyang & Adam, Saadelnour Abdueljabbar & Pan, Xinyu & Xu, Chao, 2020. "Three-dimensional numerical investigation of a hybrid low concentrated photovoltaic/thermal system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    4. Emmanuel Wendsongre Ramde & Eric Tutu Tchao & Yesuenyeagbe Atsu Kwabla Fiagbe & Jerry John Kponyo & Asakipaam Simon Atuah, 2020. "Pilot Low-Cost Concentrating Solar Power Systems Deployment in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Case Study of Implementation Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-14, August.
    5. Collado, Francisco J. & Guallar, Jesus, 2019. "Quick design of regular heliostat fields for commercial solar tower power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 115-125.
    6. Ahmed, K. Arshad & Natarajan, E., 2020. "Numerical investigation on the effect of toroidal rings in a parabolic trough receiver with the operation of gases: An energy and exergy analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    7. Merchán, R.P. & Santos, M.J. & Medina, A. & Calvo Hernández, A., 2022. "High temperature central tower plants for concentrated solar power: 2021 overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    8. Wang, Ding & Chen, Yuxuan & Xiao, Hu & Zhang, Yanping, 2022. "Effects of geometric and operating parameters on thermal performance of conical cavity receivers using supercritical CO2 as heat transfer fluid," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 804-819.
    9. Ju, Xing & Abd El-Samie, Mostafa M. & Xu, Chao & Yu, Hangyu & Pan, Xinyu & Yang, Yongping, 2020. "A fully coupled numerical simulation of a hybrid concentrated photovoltaic/thermal system that employs a therminol VP-1 based nanofluid as a spectral beam filter," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    10. Hassan, Atazaz & Quanfang, Chen & Abbas, Sajid & Lu, Wu & Youming, Luo, 2021. "An experimental investigation on thermal and optical analysis of cylindrical and conical cavity copper tube receivers design for solar dish concentrator," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1849-1864.
    11. Hachicha, Ahmed Amine & Yousef, Bashria A.A. & Said, Zafar & Rodríguez, Ivette, 2019. "A review study on the modeling of high-temperature solar thermal collector systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 280-298.
    12. Praveen R. P., 2019. "Performance Analysis and Optimization of Central Receiver Solar Thermal Power Plants for Utility Scale Power Generation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
    13. Tang, X.Y. & Yang, W.W. & Yang, Y. & Jiao, Y.H. & Zhang, T., 2021. "A design method for optimizing the secondary reflector of a parabolic trough solar concentrator to achieve uniform heat flux distribution," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cruz, N.C. & Redondo, J.L. & Berenguel, M. & Álvarez, J.D. & Ortigosa, P.M., 2017. "Review of software for optical analyzing and optimizing heliostat fields," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 1001-1018.
    2. Mostafavi Tehrani, S. Saeed & Taylor, Robert A., 2016. "Off-design simulation and performance of molten salt cavity receivers in solar tower plants under realistic operational modes and control strategies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 698-715.
    3. Ortega, Guillermo & Rovira, Antonio, 2020. "A new method for the selection of candidates for shading and blocking in central receiver systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 961-973.
    4. Wang, Jianxing & Duan, Liqiang & Yang, Yongping, 2018. "An improvement crossover operation method in genetic algorithm and spatial optimization of heliostat field," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 15-28.
    5. Hu, Peng & Huang, Weidong, 2018. "Performance analysis and optimization of an integrated azimuth tracking solar tower," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 247-257.
    6. Collado, Francisco J. & Guallar, Jesús, 2013. "A review of optimized design layouts for solar power tower plants with campo code," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 142-154.
    7. Carrizosa, E. & Domínguez-Bravo, C. & Fernández-Cara, E. & Quero, M., 2015. "Optimization of multiple receivers solar power tower systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 2085-2093.
    8. Cruz, N.C. & Salhi, S. & Redondo, J.L. & Álvarez, J.D. & Berenguel, M. & Ortigosa, P.M., 2018. "Hector, a new methodology for continuous and pattern-free heliostat field optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 1123-1131.
    9. Atif, Maimoon. & Al-Sulaiman, Fahad A., 2017. "Energy and exergy analyses of solar tower power plant driven supercritical carbon dioxide recompression cycles for six different locations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P1), pages 153-167.
    10. Zhang, Maolong & Yang, Lijun & Xu, Chao & Du, Xiaoze, 2016. "An efficient code to optimize the heliostat field and comparisons between the biomimetic spiral and staggered layout," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(P1), pages 720-730.
    11. Merchán, R.P. & Santos, M.J. & Medina, A. & Calvo Hernández, A., 2022. "High temperature central tower plants for concentrated solar power: 2021 overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    12. Okoroigwe, Edmund & Madhlopa, Amos, 2016. "An integrated combined cycle system driven by a solar tower: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 337-350.
    13. Collado, Francisco J. & Guallar, Jesus, 2019. "Quick design of regular heliostat fields for commercial solar tower power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 115-125.
    14. Arrif, Toufik & Hassani, Samir & Guermoui, Mawloud & Sánchez-González, A. & A.Taylor, Robert & Belaid, Abdelfetah, 2022. "GA-GOA hybrid algorithm and comparative study of different metaheuristic population-based algorithms for solar tower heliostat field design," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 745-758.
    15. Rizvi, Arslan A. & Yang, Dong, 2022. "A detailed account of calculation of shading and blocking factor of a heliostat field," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 292-303.
    16. Wang, Kun & He, Ya-Ling & Qiu, Yu & Zhang, Yuwen, 2016. "A novel integrated simulation approach couples MCRT and Gebhart methods to simulate solar radiation transfer in a solar power tower system with a cavity receiver," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 93-107.
    17. Xie, Qiyue & Guo, Ziqi & Liu, Daifei & Chen, Zhisheng & Shen, Zhongli & Wang, Xiaoli, 2021. "Optimization of heliostat field distribution based on improved Gray Wolf optimization algorithm," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 447-458.
    18. Zecan Tu & Daniela Piccioni Koch & Nenad Sarunac & Martin Frank & Junkui Mao, 2021. "Thermal Analysis of a Solar External Receiver Tube with a Novel Component of Guide Vanes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-21, April.
    19. Saghafifar, Mohammad & Gadalla, Mohamed, 2016. "Thermo-economic analysis of air bottoming cycle hybridization using heliostat field collector: A comparative analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 698-714.
    20. Al-Sulaiman, Fahad A. & Atif, Maimoon, 2015. "Performance comparison of different supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycles integrated with a solar power tower," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 61-71.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:94:y:2018:i:c:p:792-803. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.