IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v56y2016icp436-453.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling and comparison of hourly photosynthetically active radiation in different ecosystems

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Lunche
  • Kisi, Ozgur
  • Zounemat-Kermani, Mohammad
  • Hu, Bo
  • Gong, Wei

Abstract

Long-term hourly observations of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), global solar radiation (Eg) and meteorological variables [air temperature (TA), relative humidity (RH), dew point (TD), water vapor pressure (VW), air pressure (PA)] observed at different types of ecosystems (agricultural farmland, wetland, forest, bay, grassland, desert and lake) in China are reported for developing and validating PAR estimating models. Three improved Artificial Neural Network (ANN) methods, Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), Generalized Regression Neural Network (GRNN), and Radial Basis Neural Network (RBNN) are proposed in this study for predicting the hourly PAR using the combinations of above meteorological variables as model inputs. The ANN models have been compared with an efficient all-sky PAR model (ALSKY) through statistical indicies root mean square errors (RMSE) and mean absolute errors (MAE) at each station. The effects of meteorological variables on the hourly PAR predictions are further analyzed for investigating the main influencing factors for each model. The results indicate that there are large differences in model accuracy for each model at each ecosystem, for example, the MLP and RBNN models whose inputs are the Eg and TA (RMSE, MAE and R2 are 7.12, 5.24 and 98.90, respectively) perform better than the GRNN and ALSYK models at the agricultural farmland AKA station, while the GRNN model (RMSE and MAE are 12.47 and 8.98, respectively) performs better than other methods at DHL station. The model inputs also play different roles in different ecosystems for each ANN model, for example, TA and PA generally have more effects than the RH, TD and VW variables in the farmland stations, while RH is more important for hourly PAR prediction than the other variables in the bay stations. Finally, the overall rank of the model accuracy is obtained, MLP and RBNN models are more accurate for estimating hourly PAR at various ecosystems in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Lunche & Kisi, Ozgur & Zounemat-Kermani, Mohammad & Hu, Bo & Gong, Wei, 2016. "Modeling and comparison of hourly photosynthetically active radiation in different ecosystems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 436-453.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:56:y:2016:i:c:p:436-453
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.068
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032115013350
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.068?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alistair M. Hetherington & F. Ian Woodward, 2003. "The role of stomata in sensing and driving environmental change," Nature, Nature, vol. 424(6951), pages 901-908, August.
    2. Neslihan Seckin & Murat Cobaner & Recep Yurtal & Tefaruk Haktanir, 2013. "Comparison of Artificial Neural Network Methods with L-moments for Estimating Flood Flow at Ungauged Sites: the Case of East Mediterranean River Basin, Turkey," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 27(7), pages 2103-2124, May.
    3. Szoplik, Jolanta, 2015. "Forecasting of natural gas consumption with artificial neural networks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 208-220.
    4. Kumar, Rajesh & Aggarwal, R.K. & Sharma, J.D., 2015. "Comparison of regression and artificial neural network models for estimation of global solar radiations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1294-1299.
    5. Wang, Lunche & Gong, Wei & Li, Chen & Lin, Aiwen & Hu, Bo & Ma, Yingying, 2013. "Measurement and estimation of photosynthetically active radiation from 1961 to 2011 in Central China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 1010-1017.
    6. Escobedo, João F. & Gomes, Eduardo N. & Oliveira, Amauri P. & Soares, Jacyra, 2011. "Ratios of UV, PAR and NIR components to global solar radiation measured at Botucatu site in Brazil," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 169-178.
    7. Kashyap, Yashwant & Bansal, Ankit & Sao, Anil K., 2015. "Solar radiation forecasting with multiple parameters neural networks," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 825-835.
    8. Wang, Lunche & Gong, Wei & Hu, Bo & Lin, Aiwen & Li, Hui & Zou, Ling, 2015. "Modeling and analysis of the spatiotemporal variations of photosynthetically active radiation in China during 1961–2012," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 1019-1032.
    9. Cho, Jaeil & Oki, Taikan & Yeh, Pat J.-F. & Kanae, Shinjiro & Kim, Wonsik, 2010. "The effect of estimated PAR uncertainties on the physiological processes of biosphere models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(12), pages 1575-1579.
    10. Eltbaakh, Yousef A. & Ruslan, M.H. & Alghoul, M.A. & Othman, M.Y. & Sopian, K. & Fadhel, M.I., 2011. "Measurement of total and spectral solar irradiance: Overview of existing research," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 1403-1426, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohammad Mahdi Forootan & Iman Larki & Rahim Zahedi & Abolfazl Ahmadi, 2022. "Machine Learning and Deep Learning in Energy Systems: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-49, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Lunche & Kisi, Ozgur & Zounemat-Kermani, Mohammad & Salazar, Germán Ariel & Zhu, Zhongmin & Gong, Wei, 2016. "Solar radiation prediction using different techniques: model evaluation and comparison," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 384-397.
    2. Yuo-Hsien Shiau & Su-Fen Yang & Rishan Adha & Syamsiyatul Muzayyanah, 2022. "Modeling Industrial Energy Demand in Relation to Subsector Manufacturing Output and Climate Change: Artificial Neural Network Insights," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, March.
    3. Hu, Bo & Liu, Hui & Wang, Yuesi, 2016. "Investigation of the variability of photosynthetically active radiation in the Tibetan Plateau, China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 240-248.
    4. Rodrigues, Eugénio & Gomes, Álvaro & Gaspar, Adélio Rodrigues & Henggeler Antunes, Carlos, 2018. "Estimation of renewable energy and built environment-related variables using neural networks – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 959-988.
    5. Bugała, A. & Zaborowicz, M. & Boniecki, P. & Janczak, D. & Koszela, K. & Czekała, W. & Lewicki, A., 2018. "Short-term forecast of generation of electric energy in photovoltaic systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 306-312.
    6. Debnath, Kumar Biswajit & Mourshed, Monjur, 2018. "Forecasting methods in energy planning models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 297-325.
    7. Nasreen Fatima Veesar & Wajid Ali Jatoi & Naila Gandahi & Ghulam Aisha & Altaf Hussain Solangi & Shahnaz Memon, 2020. "Evaluation of Cotton Genotypes for Drought Tolerance and Their Correlation Study at Seedling Stage," Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, Biomedical Research Network+, LLC, vol. 29(1), pages 22090-22099, July.
    8. Magazzino, Cosimo & Mele, Marco & Schneider, Nicolas, 2021. "A D2C algorithm on the natural gas consumption and economic growth: Challenges faced by Germany and Japan," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    9. Alexandru Pîrjan & Simona-Vasilica Oprea & George Căruțașu & Dana-Mihaela Petroșanu & Adela Bâra & Cristina Coculescu, 2017. "Devising Hourly Forecasting Solutions Regarding Electricity Consumption in the Case of Commercial Center Type Consumers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-36, October.
    10. Feiyan Chen & Zhigao Zhou & Aiwen Lin & Jiqiang Niu & Wenmin Qin & Zhong Yang, 2019. "Evaluation of Direct Horizontal Irradiance in China Using a Physically-Based Model and Machine Learning Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, January.
    11. Edna S. Solano & Payman Dehghanian & Carolina M. Affonso, 2022. "Solar Radiation Forecasting Using Machine Learning and Ensemble Feature Selection," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-18, September.
    12. Porfirio, Anthony Carlos Silva & De Souza, José Leonaldo & Lyra, Gustavo Bastos & Maringolo Lemes, Marco Antonio, 2012. "An assessment of the global UV solar radiation under various sky conditions in Maceió-Northeastern Brazil," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 584-592.
    13. Fi-John Chang & Yu-Chung Wang & Wen-Ping Tsai, 2016. "Modelling Intelligent Water Resources Allocation for Multi-users," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(4), pages 1395-1413, March.
    14. Yadav, Amit Kumar & Malik, Hasmat & Chandel, S.S., 2015. "Application of rapid miner in ANN based prediction of solar radiation for assessment of solar energy resource potential of 76 sites in Northwestern India," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1093-1106.
    15. Wei, Nan & Li, Changjun & Peng, Xiaolong & Li, Yang & Zeng, Fanhua, 2019. "Daily natural gas consumption forecasting via the application of a novel hybrid model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 358-368.
    16. Rohani, Abbas & Taki, Morteza & Abdollahpour, Masoumeh, 2018. "A novel soft computing model (Gaussian process regression with K-fold cross validation) for daily and monthly solar radiation forecasting (Part: I)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 411-422.
    17. Zeng, Huibin & Shao, Bilin & Dai, Hongbin & Yan, Yichuan & Tian, Ning, 2023. "Prediction of fluctuation loads based on GARCH family-CatBoost-CNNLSTM," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PE).
    18. Li, Wei & Lu, Can, 2019. "The multiple effectiveness of state natural gas consumption constraint policies for achieving sustainable development targets in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 685-698.
    19. Wuyue An & Lin Wang & Dongfeng Zhang, 2023. "Comprehensive commodity price forecasting framework using text mining methods," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(7), pages 1865-1888, November.
    20. Oleksandr Castello & Marina Resta, 2023. "A Machine-Learning-Based Approach for Natural Gas Futures Curve Modeling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-22, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:56:y:2016:i:c:p:436-453. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.