IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v211y2025ics136403212400933x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Falling particle and sodium billboard receivers for polar-field solar tower plants: A techno-economic comparison

Author

Listed:
  • Sobic, Filip
  • Gentile, Giancarlo
  • Binotti, Marco
  • Giostri, Andrea
  • Pasqualotto, Omar
  • Manzolini, Giampaolo

Abstract

Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) systems utilizing tower technology are acknowledged as a promising solution for generating dispatchable and renewable electricity. In the pursuit of heightened efficiency and competitiveness, novel receiver technologies, including falling particle and sodium billboard receivers, are under investigation due to their capacity to achieve higher maximum temperatures compared to solar salts receivers. This study presents methodologies and findings from a techno-economic comparison between falling particle, sodium billboard, and conventional billboard receiver adopting solar salts as heat transfer fluid. For each investigated technology, receiver design is optimized through a parametric procedure based on LCOE minimization. For a given solar field and location, the height and width of the particle receiver, as well as, storage size are optimized, while for billboard receivers number of panels and tube diameter are also considered. Results obtained for a 100 MWth solar tower in Daggett, California indicate that the sodium receiver exhibits the best energy performance with a 22.2 % yearly solar-to-electric efficiency, followed by solar salts technology at 20.0 %, and particle receiver at 18.4 %. However, from a techno-economic perspective, particle receiver shows the lowest LCOE, with solar salts and sodium technologies showing values approximately 13.3 % and 13.9 % higher, respectively. Finally, a sensitivity analysis is carried out to show the significant influence of cost assumptions on the results.

Suggested Citation

  • Sobic, Filip & Gentile, Giancarlo & Binotti, Marco & Giostri, Andrea & Pasqualotto, Omar & Manzolini, Giampaolo, 2025. "Falling particle and sodium billboard receivers for polar-field solar tower plants: A techno-economic comparison," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:211:y:2025:i:c:s136403212400933x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2024.115207
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136403212400933X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2024.115207?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gentile, Giancarlo & Picotti, Giovanni & Binotti, Marco & Cholette, Michael E. & Manzolini, Giampaolo, 2024. "A comprehensive methodology for the design of solar tower external receivers," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    2. Crespi, Francesco & Gavagnin, Giacomo & Sánchez, David & Martínez, Gonzalo S., 2017. "Supercritical carbon dioxide cycles for power generation: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 152-183.
    3. Manzolini, Giampaolo & Lucca, Gaia & Binotti, Marco & Lozza, Giovanni, 2021. "A two-step procedure for the selection of innovative high temperature heat transfer fluids in solar tower power plants," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 807-822.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Yifan & Wang, Yuan & Zhao, Yuxin, 2024. "A new thermodynamic modeling method for Brayton cycle schemes based on heat flux of the heat source," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    2. Aofang Yu & Wen Su & Li Zhao & Xinxing Lin & Naijun Zhou, 2020. "New Knowledge on the Performance of Supercritical Brayton Cycle with CO 2 -Based Mixtures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-23, April.
    3. Naumov, Vladimir & Doninelli, Michele & Di Marcoberardino, Gioele & Iora, Paolo, 2025. "Solar tower power plants with CO2+SiCl4 mixtures transcritical cycles," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    4. Thanganadar, Dhinesh & Fornarelli, Francesco & Camporeale, Sergio & Asfand, Faisal & Patchigolla, Kumar, 2021. "Off-design and annual performance analysis of supercritical carbon dioxide cycle with thermal storage for CSP application," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PA).
    5. Yuhui Xiao & Yuan Zhou & Yuan Yuan & Yanping Huang & Gengyuan Tian, 2023. "Research Advances in the Application of the Supercritical CO 2 Brayton Cycle to Reactor Systems: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-23, October.
    6. Heo, Jin Young & Kim, Min Seok & Baik, Seungjoon & Bae, Seong Jun & Lee, Jeong Ik, 2017. "Thermodynamic study of supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle using an isothermal compressor," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1118-1130.
    7. Thanganadar, Dhinesh & Fornarelli, Francesco & Camporeale, Sergio & Asfand, Faisal & Gillard, Jonathon & Patchigolla, Kumar, 2022. "Thermo-economic analysis, optimisation and systematic integration of supercritical carbon dioxide cycle with sensible heat thermal energy storage for CSP application," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PB).
    8. Guo, Jia-Qi & Li, Ming-Jia & Xu, Jin-Liang & Yan, Jun-Jie & Wang, Kun, 2019. "Thermodynamic performance analysis of different supercritical Brayton cycles using CO2-based binary mixtures in the molten salt solar power tower systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 785-798.
    9. Olumayegun, Olumide & Wang, Meihong & Oko, Eni, 2019. "Thermodynamic performance evaluation of supercritical CO2 closed Brayton cycles for coal-fired power generation with solvent-based CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 1074-1088.
    10. Nie, Xianhua & Du, Zhenyu & Zhao, Li & Deng, Shuai & Zhang, Yue, 2019. "Molecular dynamics study on transport properties of supercritical working fluids: Literature review and case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 63-80.
    11. Feng, Jiaqi & Wang, Junpeng & Chen, Zhentao & Li, Yuzhe & Luo, Zhengyuan & Bai, Bofeng, 2024. "Performance advantages of transcritical CO2 cycle in the marine environment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    12. Duniam, Sam & Veeraragavan, Ananthanarayanan, 2019. "Off-design performance of the supercritical carbon dioxide recompression Brayton cycle with NDDCT cooling for concentrating solar power," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    13. Delsoto, G.S. & Battisti, F.G. & da Silva, A.K., 2023. "Dynamic modeling and control of a solar-powered Brayton cycle using supercritical CO2 and optimization of its thermal energy storage," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 336-356.
    14. Fabrizio Reale & Raffaela Calabria & Patrizio Massoli, 2023. "Performance Analysis of WHR Systems for Marine Applications Based on sCO 2 Gas Turbine and ORC," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-19, May.
    15. Wang, Shengpeng & Zhang, Yifan & Li, Hongzhi & Yao, Mingyu & Peng, Botao & Yan, Junjie, 2020. "Thermohydrodynamic analysis of the vertical gas wall and reheat gas wall in a 300 MW supercritical CO2 boiler," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    16. Astolfi, Marco & Alfani, Dario & Lasala, Silvia & Macchi, Ennio, 2018. "Comparison between ORC and CO2 power systems for the exploitation of low-medium temperature heat sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 1250-1261.
    17. Haicai Lyu & Han Wang & Qincheng Bi & Fenglei Niu, 2022. "Experimental Investigation on Heat Transfer and Pressure Drop of Supercritical Carbon Dioxide in a Mini Vertical Upward Flow," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-14, August.
    18. Gao, Lei & Cao, Tao & Hwang, Yunho & Radermacher, Reinhard, 2022. "Robustness analysis in supercritical CO2 power generation system configuration optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    19. Zhang, Zeqin & Zhang, Zhipeng & Wang, Chenglong & Guo, Kailun & Tian, Wenxi & Su, Guanghui & Qiu, Suizheng, 2025. "Heat pipe-cooled reactors: A comprehensive review of evolution, challenges, research status, and outlook," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    20. Schifflechner, Christopher & de Reus, Jasper & Schuster, Sebastian & Corpancho Villasana, Andreas & Brillert, Dieter & Saar, Martin O. & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2024. "Paving the way for CO2-Plume Geothermal (CPG) systems: A perspective on the CO2 surface equipment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:211:y:2025:i:c:s136403212400933x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.