IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v153y2022ics1364032121010662.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bioenergy production from the organic fraction of municipal solid waste and sewage sludge using mesophilic anaerobic co-digestion: An experimental and kinetic modeling study

Author

Listed:
  • Sedighi, Afsane
  • Karrabi, Mohsen
  • Shahnavaz, Bahar
  • Mostafavinezhad, Morteza

Abstract

Following the rapid surge in global demand for energy as well as the rising generation of municipal solid waste (MSW) worldwide, much more attention has been drawn to sustainable waste management solutions to tackle both problems. The present study investigated the potential for biogas production from the anaerobic co-digestion (ACD) of the organic fraction of MSW (OFMSW) and sewage sludge after physical and chemical pretreatments at three inoculum-to-substrate (I/S) ratios (ISR: 2, 4, & 6) and three levels of total solids (TS: 3, 5, & 7%). A series of experiments were further carried out in laboratory-scale (1-L) single-stage digesters in batch mode at the temperature of 35 °C (viz. Under mesophilic conditions) for 50 days. The results demonstrated that the digestion produced the best outputs at TS = 5% and ISR = 2, whereby it offered the biogas yield of 0.697, the methane (CH4) production of 0.448 m3/Kg-volatile solid (VS)added, and the total VS (TVS) removal by 65%. Moreover, it was observed that most reactors with TS = 7% encountered the phase separation problem while augmenting the TS content from 3 to 5% increased the biogas yield and CH4 production. The kinetic study of the mesophilic ACD additionally showed that both models of modified Gompertz (GM) equation and logistic function (LF) provided a reasonably accurate description of biogas production, but the first-order (FO) model failed in this task. Furthermore, the amount of sludge (namely, ISR) in the digester enlarged and the models showed a better fit to the experimental data.

Suggested Citation

  • Sedighi, Afsane & Karrabi, Mohsen & Shahnavaz, Bahar & Mostafavinezhad, Morteza, 2022. "Bioenergy production from the organic fraction of municipal solid waste and sewage sludge using mesophilic anaerobic co-digestion: An experimental and kinetic modeling study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:153:y:2022:i:c:s1364032121010662
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111797
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032121010662
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111797?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Siciliano, A. & Stillitano, M.A. & De Rosa, S., 2016. "Biogas production from wet olive mill wastes pretreated with hydrogen peroxide in alkaline conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 903-916.
    2. Maghanaki, M. Mohammadi & Ghobadian, B. & Najafi, G. & Galogah, R. Janzadeh, 2013. "Potential of biogas production in Iran," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 702-714.
    3. Alexander Keucken & Moshe Habagil & Damien Batstone & Ulf Jeppsson & Magnus Arnell, 2018. "Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Sludge and Organic Food Waste—Performance, Inhibition, and Impact on the Microbial Community," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-13, September.
    4. Bedoić, Robert & Špehar, Ana & Puljko, Josip & Čuček, Lidija & Ćosić, Boris & Pukšec, Tomislav & Duić, Neven, 2020. "Opportunities and challenges: Experimental and kinetic analysis of anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and rendering industry streams for biogas production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    5. Latifi, Pooria & Karrabi, Mohsen & Danesh, Shahnaz, 2019. "Anaerobic co-digestion of poultry slaughterhouse wastes with sewage sludge in batch-mode bioreactors (effect of inoculum-substrate ratio and total solids)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 288-296.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Walczak, Justyna & Karolinczak, Beata & Zubrowska-Sudol, Monika, 2023. "Effect of co-digestion and hydrodynamic disintegration on the methane potential of sewage sludge and organic fraction of municipal solid waste with consideration of the carbon footprint," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Md. Alhaz Uddin & Sk. Yasir Arafat Siddiki & Shams Forruque Ahmed & Zahidul Islam Rony & M. A. K. Chowdhury & M. Mofijur, 2021. "Estimation of Sustainable Bioenergy Production from Olive Mill Solid Waste," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-11, November.
    2. Zareei, Samira, 2018. "Project scheduling for constructing biogas plant using critical path method," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 756-759.
    3. Taghizadeh-Alisaraei, Ahmad & Motevali, Ali & Ghobadian, Barat, 2019. "Ethanol production from date wastes: Adapted technologies, challenges, and global potential," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 1094-1110.
    4. Sohoo, Ihsanullah & Ritzkowski, Marco & Heerenklage, Jörn & Kuchta, Kerstin, 2021. "Biochemical methane potential assessment of municipal solid waste generated in Asian cities: A case study of Karachi, Pakistan," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    5. Taghizadeh-Alisaraei, Ahmad & Assar, Hossein Alizadeh & Ghobadian, Barat & Motevali, Ali, 2017. "Potential of biofuel production from pistachio waste in Iran," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 510-522.
    6. Sandra Arla & Reinaldo Delgado & Leonardo Goyos & Leandro Robaina, 2022. "Two-Phase Experimentation to Determine the Optimal Composition for the Production of Biogas and Biol Substrate Mixing Waste from the Camal de Guayaquil," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Bedoić, Robert & Dorotić, Hrvoje & Schneider, Daniel Rolph & Čuček, Lidija & Ćosić, Boris & Pukšec, Tomislav & Duić, Neven, 2021. "Synergy between feedstock gate fee and power-to-gas: An energy and economic analysis of renewable methane production in a biogas plant," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 12-23.
    8. Andrius Tamošiūnas & Ajmia Chouchène & Pranas Valatkevičius & Dovilė Gimžauskaitė & Mindaugas Aikas & Rolandas Uscila & Makrem Ghorbel & Mejdi Jeguirim, 2017. "The Potential of Thermal Plasma Gasification of Olive Pomace Charcoal," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-14, May.
    9. Hajizadeh, Abdollah & Mohamadi-Baghmolaei, Mohamad & Cata Saady, Noori M. & Zendehboudi, Sohrab, 2022. "Hydrogen production from biomass through integration of anaerobic digestion and biogas dry reforming," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    10. Ahmadi, Ehsan & Yousefzadeh, Samira & Mokammel, Adel & Miri, Mohammad & Ansari, Mohsen & Arfaeinia, Hossein & Badi, Mojtaba Yegane & Ghaffari, Hamid Reza & Rezaei, Soheila & Mahvi, Amir Hossein, 2020. "Kinetic study and performance evaluation of an integrated two-phase fixed-film baffled bioreactor for bioenergy recovery from wastewater and bio-wasted sludge," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    11. Khoshgoftar Manesh, M.H. & Rezazadeh, A. & Kabiri, S., 2020. "A feasibility study on the potential, economic, and environmental advantages of biogas production from poultry manure in Iran," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 87-106.
    12. Jakub Sikora & Marcin Niemiec & Anna Szeląg-Sikora & Zofia Gródek-Szostak & Maciej Kuboń & Monika Komorowska, 2020. "The Effect of the Addition of a Fat Emulsifier on the Amount and Quality of the Obtained Biogas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-12, April.
    13. Budzianowski, Wojciech M., 2016. "A review of potential innovations for production, conditioning and utilization of biogas with multiple-criteria assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1148-1171.
    14. Mollahosseini, Arash & Hosseini, Seyed Amid & Jabbari, Mostafa & Figoli, Alberto & Rahimpour, Ahmad, 2017. "Renewable energy management and market in Iran: A holistic review on current state and future demands," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 774-788.
    15. Halder, P.K. & Paul, N. & Joardder, M.U.H. & Khan, M.Z.H. & Sarker, M., 2016. "Feasibility analysis of implementing anaerobic digestion as a potential energy source in Bangladesh," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 124-134.
    16. Kumari, Dolly & Singh, Radhika, 2018. "Pretreatment of lignocellulosic wastes for biofuel production: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 877-891.
    17. Muhammad U. Khan & Muhammad Ahmad & Muhammad Sultan & Ihsanullah Sohoo & Prakash C. Ghimire & Azlan Zahid & Abid Sarwar & Muhammad Farooq & Uzair Sajjad & Peyman Abdeshahian & Maryam Yousaf, 2021. "Biogas Production Potential from Livestock Manure in Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-17, June.
    18. Alessio Siciliano & Maria Assuntina Stillitano & Carlo Limonti, 2016. "Energetic Valorization of Wet Olive Mill Wastes through a Suitable Integrated Treatment: H 2 O 2 with Lime and Anaerobic Digestion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-15, November.
    19. Khalil, Munawar & Berawi, Mohammed Ali & Heryanto, Rudi & Rizalie, Akhmad, 2019. "Waste to energy technology: The potential of sustainable biogas production from animal waste in Indonesia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 323-331.
    20. Mat Yasin, Mohd Hafizil & Mamat, Rizalman & Najafi, G. & Ali, Obed Majeed & Yusop, Ahmad Fitri & Ali, Mohd Hafiz, 2017. "Potentials of palm oil as new feedstock oil for a global alternative fuel: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1034-1049.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:153:y:2022:i:c:s1364032121010662. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.