IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i24p9624-d1007721.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Two-Phase Experimentation to Determine the Optimal Composition for the Production of Biogas and Biol Substrate Mixing Waste from the Camal de Guayaquil

Author

Listed:
  • Sandra Arla

    (Department of Energy Sciences and Mechanics, Universidad de las Fuerzas Armadas ESPE, Sangolqui 171103, Ecuador)

  • Reinaldo Delgado

    (Department of Energy Sciences and Mechanics, Universidad de las Fuerzas Armadas ESPE, Sangolqui 171103, Ecuador)

  • Leonardo Goyos

    (Department of Energy Sciences and Mechanics, Universidad de las Fuerzas Armadas ESPE, Sangolqui 171103, Ecuador)

  • Leandro Robaina

    (Facultad de Ingeniería Civil y Ambiental, Escuela Politécnica Nacional (EPN), Quito 170525, Ecuador)

Abstract

In this two-phase study, it was shown that a mixture with equal parts of manure and resulting animal blood was the optimal combination for obtaining biogas and biol. A quadratic growth trend in variable gas pressure over time—as well as its behavior—was confirmed for pHs around the neutral value for the substrate used in both the pilot phase and in the microplant, which had a mechanical implementation and mechatronic system for the control of variables that intervene in the anaerobic digestion process; this allowed for the confirmation of the results found in the first phase of research—without concerns that a lack of control over the process variables would cause—in such a way that it constituted a path for the industrialization of the waste treatment process in slaughterhouses that could be optimized by the use of the optimal combination that produces the greatest cm 3 amount of gas. Anaerobic digestion in biodigesters is carried out at different constant temperature values within the mesophilic range, with a hydraulic retention time of 25 days. A direct relationship was found between temperature, biogas production and pH behavior in the buffer(s). The pH remained close to neutral and the gas pressure increased from 15 to 20. The findings indicated that the value for the C/N ratio of the blood of four was compensated for by its buffer system, composed of bicarbonate, hemoglobin, proteins and phosphates.

Suggested Citation

  • Sandra Arla & Reinaldo Delgado & Leonardo Goyos & Leandro Robaina, 2022. "Two-Phase Experimentation to Determine the Optimal Composition for the Production of Biogas and Biol Substrate Mixing Waste from the Camal de Guayaquil," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-19, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:24:p:9624-:d:1007721
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/24/9624/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/24/9624/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mussoline, Wendy & Esposito, Giovanni & Lens, Piet & Garuti, Gilberto & Giordano, Andrea, 2014. "Electrical energy production and operational strategies from a farm-scale anaerobic batch reactor loaded with rice straw and piggery wastewater," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 399-406.
    2. Amorim, A.K.B. & de Nardi, I.R. & Del Nery, V., 2007. "Water conservation and effluent minimization: Case study of a poultry slaughterhouse," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 93-100.
    3. Bundhoo, Zumar M.A. & Mauthoor, Sumayya & Mohee, Romeela, 2016. "Potential of biogas production from biomass and waste materials in the Small Island Developing State of Mauritius," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 1087-1100.
    4. Latifi, Pooria & Karrabi, Mohsen & Danesh, Shahnaz, 2019. "Anaerobic co-digestion of poultry slaughterhouse wastes with sewage sludge in batch-mode bioreactors (effect of inoculum-substrate ratio and total solids)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 288-296.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ozdemir, Saim & Şimşek, Aslı & Ozdemir, Serkan & Dede, Cemile, 2022. "Investigation of poultry slaughterhouse waste stream to produce bio-fuel for internal utilization," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 274-282.
    2. Ahmadi, Ehsan & Yousefzadeh, Samira & Mokammel, Adel & Miri, Mohammad & Ansari, Mohsen & Arfaeinia, Hossein & Badi, Mojtaba Yegane & Ghaffari, Hamid Reza & Rezaei, Soheila & Mahvi, Amir Hossein, 2020. "Kinetic study and performance evaluation of an integrated two-phase fixed-film baffled bioreactor for bioenergy recovery from wastewater and bio-wasted sludge," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    3. Jakub Sikora & Marcin Niemiec & Anna Szeląg-Sikora & Zofia Gródek-Szostak & Maciej Kuboń & Monika Komorowska, 2020. "The Effect of the Addition of a Fat Emulsifier on the Amount and Quality of the Obtained Biogas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-12, April.
    4. Maurizio Bressan & Elena Campagnoli & Carlo Giovanni Ferro & Valter Giaretto, 2023. "A Mass Balance-Based Method for the Anaerobic Digestion of Rice Straw," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-19, May.
    5. Sun, Hui & Wang, Enzhen & Li, Xiang & Cui, Xian & Guo, Jianbin & Dong, Renjie, 2021. "Potential biomethane production from crop residues in China: Contributions to carbon neutrality," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    6. Amira Oueslati & Samia Dabbou & Nosra Methneni & Giuseppe Montevecchi & Vincenzo Nava & Rossana Rando & Giovanni Bartolomeo & Andrea Antonelli & Giuseppa Di Bella & Hedi Ben Mansour, 2023. "Pomological and Olive Oil Quality Characteristics Evaluation under Short Time Irrigation of Olive Trees cv. Chemlali with Untreated Industrial Poultry Wastewater," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, February.
    7. Llerena-Pizarro, Omar R. & Micena, Raul Pereira & Tuna, Celso Eduardo & Silveira, José Luz, 2019. "Electricity sector in the Galapagos Islands: Current status, renewable sources, and hybrid power generation system proposal," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 65-75.
    8. Grosser, A. & Neczaj, E. & Jasinska, Anna & Celary, P., 2020. "The influence of grease trap sludge sterilization on the performance of anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 988-997.
    9. Bundhoo, Zumar M.A., 2018. "Renewable energy exploitation in the small island developing state of Mauritius: Current practice and future potential," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2029-2038.
    10. Shane, Agabu & Gheewala, Shabbir H. & Phiri, Seveliano, 2017. "Rural domestic biogas supply model for Zambia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 683-697.
    11. Stergios Vakalis & Snehesh Shivananda Ail & Konstantinos Moustakas & Marco J. Castaldi, 2023. "Operation and Thermodynamic Modeling of a Novel Advanced Hydrothermal Reactor: Introduction of the Novel 3-Step Evolution Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-14, February.
    12. Abdelhady, Suzan & Borello, Domenico & Shaban, Ahmed, 2018. "Techno-economic assessment of biomass power plant fed with rice straw: Sensitivity and parametric analysis of the performance and the LCOE," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 1026-1034.
    13. de Moraes Dutenkefer, Raphael & de Oliveira Ribeiro, Celma & Morgado Mutran, Victoria & Eduardo Rego, Erik, 2018. "The insertion of biogas in the sugarcane mill product portfolio: A study using the robust optimization approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 729-740.
    14. Khidr, Kareem I. & Eldrainy, Yehia A. & EL-Kassaby, Mohamed M., 2017. "Towards lower gas turbine emissions: Flameless distributed combustion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 1237-1266.
    15. Xu, Fuqing & Okopi, Solomon Inalegwu & Jiang, Yongmei & Chen, Zhou & Meng, Liyun & Li, Yebo & Sun, Weimin & Li, Chaokun, 2022. "Multi-criteria assessment of food waste and waste paper anaerobic co-digestion: Effects of inoculation ratio, total solids content, and feedstock composition," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 40-50.
    16. Djaafri, Mohammed & Drissi, Aicha & Mehdaoui, Sabrina & Kalloum, Slimane & Atelge, M.R. & Khelafi, Mostefa & Kaidi, Kamel & Salem, Fethya & Tahri, Ahmed & Atabani, A.E. & Štěpanec, Libor, 2023. "Anaerobic digestion of dry palms from five cultivars of Algerian date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) namely H'mira, Teggaza, Tinacer, Aghamou and Takarbouchet: A new comparative study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    17. Loganath, Radhakrishnan & Senophiyah-Mary, J., 2020. "Critical review on the necessity of bioelectricity generation from slaughterhouse industry waste and wastewater using different anaerobic digestion reactors," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    18. Furqan Muhayodin & Albrecht Fritze & Vera Susanne Rotter, 2021. "Mass Balance of C, Nutrients, and Mineralization of Nitrogen during Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Rice Straw with Cow Manure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-18, October.
    19. Sedighi, Afsane & Karrabi, Mohsen & Shahnavaz, Bahar & Mostafavinezhad, Morteza, 2022. "Bioenergy production from the organic fraction of municipal solid waste and sewage sludge using mesophilic anaerobic co-digestion: An experimental and kinetic modeling study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    20. Santo Fabio Corsino & Michele Torregrossa & Gaspare Viviani, 2021. "Biomethane Production from Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Selected Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste (OFMSW) with Sewage Sludge: Effect of the Inoculum to Substrate Ratio (ISR) and Mixture Composit," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-12, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:24:p:9624-:d:1007721. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.