IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v109y2019icp71-84.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An analysis of South Korea's energy transition policy with regards to offshore wind power development

Author

Listed:
  • Park, Jaehee
  • Kim, Bumsuk

Abstract

South Korea's new energy transition policy was declared in 2017 as citizen demand grew for solutions to safety problems caused by successive earthquakes affecting areas with many nuclear power plants in 2016 and 2017 as well as health problems caused by coal-fired power plants contributing to high condensable particulate matter in spring. This policy focuses on both a reduction in nuclear and coal-fired power plants and further development of eco-friendly and sustainable power generation and supply. The South Korean government is thus planning a large-scale transition toward improved energy efficiency as well as safe and clean energy sources. Its announced goal is to supply a 20% share of renewable energy in the national energy mix, including 37 GW of photovoltaic power, 3 GW of onshore wind power, and 13 GW of offshore wind power by 2030; the latter is expected to play a strategic role in the Renewable Energy 2030 plan. As South Korea's geographic conditions enable large-scale offshore wind farm projects that are relatively free from complaints and visual effects caused by transportation, installation, noise, vibration, and damage to natural environments, it is highly likely that wind power will become one of the nation's major renewable electricity sources. This paper discusses the potential for developing offshore wind farm projects in South Korea with particular focus on analyzing offshore resources and reviewing government policies and support programs that could limit or otherwise challenge the deployment of such projects, with further considerations of policy choices that could improve the deployment of offshore wind power. As the greatest hindrances to offshore wind power development are frequently-changed government policies and support programs, the adoption of consistent, stable, and efficient guidelines and supports would be most beneficial for meeting South Korea's goals of increased offshore wind energy supplies.

Suggested Citation

  • Park, Jaehee & Kim, Bumsuk, 2019. "An analysis of South Korea's energy transition policy with regards to offshore wind power development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 71-84.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:109:y:2019:i:c:p:71-84
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.04.031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032119302436
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2019.04.031?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Myhr, Anders & Bjerkseter, Catho & Ågotnes, Anders & Nygaard, Tor A., 2014. "Levelised cost of energy for offshore floating wind turbines in a life cycle perspective," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 714-728.
    2. Han, Dongsu & Baek, Sanghoon, 2017. "Status of renewable capacity for electricity generation and future prospects in Korea: Global trends and domestic strategies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 1524-1533.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ifaei, Pouya & Tayerani Charmchi, Amir Saman & Loy-Benitez, Jorge & Yang, Rebecca Jing & Yoo, ChangKyoo, 2022. "A data-driven analytical roadmap to a sustainable 2030 in South Korea based on optimal renewable microgrids," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    2. Park, Seona & Yun, Sun-Jin & Cho, Kongjang, 2022. "Public dialogue as a collaborative planning process for offshore wind energy projects: Implications from a text analysis of a South Korean case," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    3. Su, Xiang & Tan, Junlan, 2023. "Regional energy transition path and the role of government support and resource endowment in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    4. Tao, Tianyou & Shi, Peng & Wang, Hao, 2020. "Spectral modelling of typhoon winds considering nexus between longitudinal and lateral components," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 2019-2030.
    5. Jui-Sheng Chou & Pin-Chao Liao & Chung-Da Yeh, 2021. "Risk Analysis and Management of Construction and Operations in Offshore Wind Power Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-18, July.
    6. McIlwaine, Neil & Foley, Aoife M. & Morrow, D. John & Al Kez, Dlzar & Zhang, Chongyu & Lu, Xi & Best, Robert J., 2021. "A state-of-the-art techno-economic review of distributed and embedded energy storage for energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    7. Liu, Tingting & Chen, Zhe & Xu, Jiuping, 2022. "Empirical evidence based effectiveness assessment of policy regimes for wind power development in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    8. Kim, Chul, 2021. "A review of the deployment programs, impact, and barriers of renewable energy policies in Korea," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    9. Rahel Renata Tanujaya & Chul-Yong Lee & JongRoul Woo & Sung-Yoon Huh & Min-Kyu Lee, 2020. "Quantifying Public Preferences for Community-Based Renewable Energy Projects in South Korea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-13, May.
    10. Jang, Yeonju & Park, Eunil, 2020. "Social acceptance of nuclear power plants in Korea: The role of public perceptions following the Fukushima accident," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carpintero Moreno, Efrain & Stansby, Peter, 2019. "The 6-float wave energy converter M4: Ocean basin tests giving capture width, response and energy yield for several sites," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 307-318.
    2. Rubio-Domingo, G. & Linares, P., 2021. "The future investment costs of offshore wind: An estimation based on auction results," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    3. Javier Serrano González & Manuel Burgos Payán & Jesús Manuel Riquelme Santos & Ángel Gaspar González Rodríguez, 2021. "Optimal Micro-Siting of Weathervaning Floating Wind Turbines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-19, February.
    4. Castro-Santos, Laura & Martins, Elson & Guedes Soares, C., 2016. "Cost assessment methodology for combined wind and wave floating offshore renewable energy systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 866-880.
    5. López, A. & Morán, J.L. & Núñez, L.R. & Somolinos, J.A., 2020. "Study of a cost model of tidal energy farms in early design phases with parametrization and numerical values. Application to a second-generation device," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    6. Chen, Hao & Gao, Xin-Ya & Liu, Jian-Yu & Zhang, Qian & Yu, Shiwei & Kang, Jia-Ning & Yan, Rui & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2020. "The grid parity analysis of onshore wind power in China: A system cost perspective," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 22-30.
    7. Manuel Corrales-Gonzalez & George Lavidas & Giovanni Besio, 2023. "Feasibility of Wave Energy Harvesting in the Ligurian Sea, Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-22, June.
    8. Karimirad, Madjid & Michailides, Constantine, 2015. "V-shaped semisubmersible offshore wind turbine: An alternative concept for offshore wind technology," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 126-143.
    9. Brooks, Sam & Mahmood, Minhal & Roy, Rajkumar & Manolesos, Marinos & Salonitis, Konstantinos, 2023. "Self-reconfiguration simulations of turbines to reduce uneven farm degradation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1301-1314.
    10. A.H.T. Shyam Kularathna & Sayaka Suda & Ken Takagi & Shigeru Tabeta, 2019. "Evaluation of Co-Existence Options of Marine Renewable Energy Projects in Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-26, May.
    11. Ifaei, Pouya & Tayerani Charmchi, Amir Saman & Loy-Benitez, Jorge & Yang, Rebecca Jing & Yoo, ChangKyoo, 2022. "A data-driven analytical roadmap to a sustainable 2030 in South Korea based on optimal renewable microgrids," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    12. Ika Kurniawati & Beatriz Beaumont & Ramon Varghese & Danka Kostadinović & Ivan Sokol & Hassan Hemida & Panagiotis Alevras & Charalampos Baniotopoulos, 2023. "Conceptual Design of a Floating Modular Energy Island for Energy Independency: A Case Study in Crete," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-21, August.
    13. Pape, Christian, 2018. "The impact of intraday markets on the market value of flexibility — Decomposing effects on profile and the imbalance costs," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 186-201.
    14. Pennock, Shona & Vanegas-Cantarero, María M. & Bloise-Thomaz, Tianna & Jeffrey, Henry & Dickson, Matthew J., 2022. "Life cycle assessment of a point-absorber wave energy array," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1078-1088.
    15. Prakash, Vrishab & Ghosh, Sajal & Kanjilal, Kakali, 2020. "Costs of avoided carbon emission from thermal and renewable sources of power in India and policy implications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    16. Laura Castro-Santos & Almudena Filgueira-Vizoso, 2019. "A Software for Calculating the Economic Aspects of Floating Offshore Renewable Energies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-19, December.
    17. Han, Chenlu & Nagamune, Ryozo, 2020. "Platform position control of floating wind turbines using aerodynamic force," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 896-907.
    18. Rusu, Eugen & Onea, Florin, 2019. "A parallel evaluation of the wind and wave energy resources along the Latin American and European coastal environments," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 1594-1607.
    19. Vincenzo Piscopo & Guido Benassai & Renata Della Morte & Antonio Scamardella, 2018. "Cost-Based Design and Selection of Point Absorber Devices for the Mediterranean Sea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-23, April.
    20. Walgern, Julia & Peters, Lennart & Madlener, Reinhard, 2017. "Economic Evaluation of Maintenance Strategies for Offshore Wind Turbines Based on Condition Monitoring Systems," FCN Working Papers 8/2017, E.ON Energy Research Center, Future Energy Consumer Needs and Behavior (FCN).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:109:y:2019:i:c:p:71-84. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.