IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v97y2016icp390-398.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exergy and exergoeconomic assessments of an electricity production system in a running wastewater treatment plant

Author

Listed:
  • Tumen Ozdil, N. Filiz
  • Tantekin, Atakan

Abstract

This study aims at presenting a detailed exergy and exergoeconomic analyses of a biogas engine powered electricity production system in a wastewater treatment plant located in Adana, Turkey. The overall system consists of a compressor, a turbine, a pump, four heat exchangers and a gas engine. The effect of the each system component on the exergy efficiency and exergoeconomic parameters is analyzed separately. The analysis indicates that major exergy destruction happens in the gas engine as 4055.31 kW, followed by the exhaust gas heat exchanger (EGHE) and lubrication oil heat exchanger (LOHE) as 99.86 kW and 92.64 kW, respectively. The second law efficiency of the compressor, turbine, pump, BGHE, LOHE, WHE, EGHE and gas engine are found as 76.50%, 78.43%, 6.49%, 13.40%, 11.56%, 60.44%, 67.36%, and 50.79%, respectively. The operating and maintenance costs, capital investment cost and total cost of the system are reckoned as 14.74 US$/h, 13.90 US$/h, and 28.64 US$/h, respectively to point out the exergoeconomic performance. The unit exergy cost and exergy cost of the fuel, which feeds the compressor, are reckoned as 4.88 US$/GJ and 141.12 US$/h. The exergy cost and electricity production unit exergy cost in the turbine are found as 4.87 US$/h and 11.32 US$/GJ.

Suggested Citation

  • Tumen Ozdil, N. Filiz & Tantekin, Atakan, 2016. "Exergy and exergoeconomic assessments of an electricity production system in a running wastewater treatment plant," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 390-398.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:97:y:2016:i:c:p:390-398
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2016.05.039
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148116304505
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2016.05.039?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brizi, Federico & Silveira, Jose Luz & Desideri, Umberto & Reis, Joaquim Antonio dos & Tuna, Celso Eduardo & Lamas, Wendell de Queiroz, 2014. "Energetic and economic analysis of a Brazilian compact cogeneration system: Comparison between natural gas and biogas," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 193-211.
    2. Carolino, Cristina Guedes & Medeiros Ferreira, João Paulo, 2013. "First and second law analyses to an energetic valorization process of biogas," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 58-64.
    3. Lazzaretto, Andrea & Tsatsaronis, George, 2006. "SPECO: A systematic and general methodology for calculating efficiencies and costs in thermal systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(8), pages 1257-1289.
    4. Colmenar-Santos, Antonio & Zarzuelo-Puch, Gloria & Borge-Diez, David & García-Diéguez, Concepción, 2016. "Thermodynamic and exergoeconomic analysis of energy recovery system of biogas from a wastewater treatment plant and use in a Stirling engine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 171-184.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rech, Sergio & Finco, Elisa & Lazzaretto, Andrea, 2020. "A multicriteria approach to choose the best renewable refrigeration system for food preservation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 368-384.
    2. Singh, Gurjeet & Tyagi, V.V. & Singh, P.J. & Pandey, A.K., 2020. "Estimation of thermodynamic characteristics for comprehensive dairy food processing plant: An energetic and exergetic approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    3. Mustafa Erguvan & David W. MacPhee, 2021. "Can a Wastewater Treatment Plant Power Itself? Results from a Novel Biokinetic-Thermodynamic Analysis," J, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-24, October.
    4. Rossi, Mosè & Spedaletti, Samuele & Lorenzetti, Matteo & Salvi, Danilo & Renzi, Massimiliano & Comodi, Gabriele & Caresana, Flavio & Pelagalli, Leonardo, 2021. "A methodology to estimate average flow rates in Water Supply Systems (WSSs) for energy recovery purposes through hydropower solutions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 1101-1113.
    5. Singh, Gurjeet & Singh, P.J. & Tyagi, V.V. & Barnwal, P. & Pandey, A.K., 2019. "Exergy and thermo-economic analysis of ghee production plant in dairy industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 602-618.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oyekale, Joseph & Petrollese, Mario & Cau, Giorgio, 2020. "Modified auxiliary exergy costing in advanced exergoeconomic analysis applied to a hybrid solar-biomass organic Rankine cycle plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    2. Sadi, M. & Arabkoohsar, A., 2019. "Exergoeconomic analysis of a combined solar-waste driven power plant," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 883-893.
    3. Petrakopoulou, Fontina & Tsatsaronis, George & Morosuk, Tatiana & Carassai, Anna, 2012. "Conventional and advanced exergetic analyses applied to a combined cycle power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 146-152.
    4. Picallo-Perez, Ana & Catrini, Pietro & Piacentino, Antonio & Sala, José-Mª, 2019. "A novel thermoeconomic analysis under dynamic operating conditions for space heating and cooling systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 819-837.
    5. Yue, Ting & Lior, Noam, 2017. "Exergo economic analysis of solar-assisted hybrid power generation systems integrated with thermochemical fuel conversion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 204-222.
    6. Primabudi, Eko & Morosuk, Tatiana & Tsatsaronis, George, 2019. "Multi-objective optimization of propane pre-cooled mixed refrigerant (C3MR) LNG process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 492-504.
    7. Silveira, Jose Luz & Lamas, Wendell de Queiroz & Tuna, Celso Eduardo & Villela, Iraides Aparecida de Castro & Miro, Laura Siso, 2012. "Ecological efficiency and thermoeconomic analysis of a cogeneration system at a hospital," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 2894-2906.
    8. Aygun, Hakan & Turan, Onder, 2021. "Exergo-economic analysis of off-design a target drone engine for reconnaissance mission flight," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    9. Soltanian, Salman & Kalogirou, Soteris A. & Ranjbari, Meisam & Amiri, Hamid & Mahian, Omid & Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Jafary, Tahereh & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Gupta, Vijai Kumar & Aghaei, Siavash & Pe, 2022. "Exergetic sustainability analysis of municipal solid waste treatment systems: A systematic critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    10. Lee, Young Duk & Ahn, Kook Young & Morosuk, Tatiana & Tsatsaronis, George, 2018. "Exergetic and exergoeconomic evaluation of an SOFC-Engine hybrid power generation system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 810-822.
    11. Silva, J.A.M. & Flórez-Orrego, D. & Oliveira, S., 2014. "An exergy based approach to determine production cost and CO2 allocation for petroleum derived fuels," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 490-495.
    12. Zhong, Like & Yao, Erren & Zou, Hansen & Xi, Guang, 2022. "Thermodynamic and economic analysis of a directly solar-driven power-to-methane system by detailed distributed parameter method," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    13. García Kerdan, Iván & Raslan, Rokia & Ruyssevelt, Paul & Morillón Gálvez, David, 2017. "A comparison of an energy/economic-based against an exergoeconomic-based multi-objective optimisation for low carbon building energy design," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 244-263.
    14. Aghaei, Ali Tavakkol & Saray, Rahim Khoshbakhti, 2021. "Optimization of a combined cooling, heating, and power (CCHP) system with a gas turbine prime mover: A case study in the dairy industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    15. Hossein Nami & Amjad Anvari-Moghaddam & Ahmad Arabkoohsar & Amir Reza Razmi, 2020. "4E Analyses of a Hybrid Waste-Driven CHP–ORC Plant with Flue Gas Condensation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-21, November.
    16. Hepbasli, Arif & Alsuhaibani, Zeyad, 2011. "Exergetic and exergoeconomic aspects of wind energy systems in achieving sustainable development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(6), pages 2810-2825, August.
    17. Christoph Sejkora & Lisa Kühberger & Fabian Radner & Alexander Trattner & Thomas Kienberger, 2020. "Exergy as Criteria for Efficient Energy Systems—A Spatially Resolved Comparison of the Current Exergy Consumption, the Current Useful Exergy Demand and Renewable Exergy Potential," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-51, February.
    18. Wang, Linyuan & Zhao, Lin & Mao, Guozhu & Zuo, Jian & Du, Huibin, 2017. "Way to accomplish low carbon development transformation: A bibliometric analysis during 1995–2014," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P1), pages 57-69.
    19. Mohammadkhani, F. & Shokati, N. & Mahmoudi, S.M.S. & Yari, M. & Rosen, M.A., 2014. "Exergoeconomic assessment and parametric study of a Gas Turbine-Modular Helium Reactor combined with two Organic Rankine Cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 533-543.
    20. Piacentino, Antonio & Cardona, Fabio, 2010. "Scope-Oriented Thermoeconomic analysis of energy systems. Part I: Looking for a non-postulated cost accounting for the dissipative devices of a vapour compression chiller. Is it feasible?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(3), pages 943-956, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:97:y:2016:i:c:p:390-398. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.