IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v256y2026ipfs0960148125021378.html

Food waste supercritical water gasification for combustible gas production: product distribution, conversion pathways, kinetic characteristics

Author

Listed:
  • Dong, Runqiu
  • Jia, Hanbing
  • Tian, Jianghua
  • Liu, Zhigang
  • Peng, Zhiyong
  • Xu, Jialing
  • Jin, Hui
  • Chen, Bin
  • Guo, Liejin

Abstract

Supercritical water gasification (SCWG) of food waste to produce combustible gas is highly promising. The existing work has focused on the evolution of gas products under various operating parameters, with limited consideration of the reaction mechanism. This work comprehensively investigated the product distribution, conversion pathways, and kinetic mechanisms of food waste gasification in supercritical water (SCW). The results indicated that increasing temperature, reaction time, and decreasing feedstock concentration can enhance the production of gas. There was no significant change in the pressure range of 23–31 MPa for gas products and liquid products. The carbon gasification efficiency (CE) and hydrogen gasification efficiency (HE) can reach 82.61 % and 78.21 % by parameter optimization (temperature of 650 °C, pressure of 25 MPa, concentration of 2 wt%, reaction time of 30 min). The reaction pathways of food waste in SCW were summarized to be mainly through the hydrolysis of food waste, degradation of chain and cyclic hydrocarbons, and conversion between gaseous products. The correlation between the experimental data and the reaction limit was analyzed through a comparative analysis of the experimental results with the thermodynamic equilibrium results to provide the direction of regulation of total gasification. The classical deceleration model indicates that the reaction rate of the process is maximum at the initial moment and then decreases with increasing reaction time. The rapid gasification of chain hydrocarbons and the slow degradation of cyclic hydrocarbons caused the food waste SCWG to exhibit a fast and then slow deceleration process. The activation energy of food waste SCWG was calculated as 194.30 kJ/mol. This work may be of great value in understanding the response process of food waste SCWG.

Suggested Citation

  • Dong, Runqiu & Jia, Hanbing & Tian, Jianghua & Liu, Zhigang & Peng, Zhiyong & Xu, Jialing & Jin, Hui & Chen, Bin & Guo, Liejin, 2026. "Food waste supercritical water gasification for combustible gas production: product distribution, conversion pathways, kinetic characteristics," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(PF).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:256:y:2026:i:pf:s0960148125021378
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2025.124473
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148125021378
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2025.124473?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yin, Yao & Liu, Ya-Juan & Meng, Shu-Juan & Kiran, Esra Uçkun & Liu, Yu, 2016. "Enzymatic pretreatment of activated sludge, food waste and their mixture for enhanced bioenergy recovery and waste volume reduction via anaerobic digestion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1131-1137.
    2. Yang, Chuang & Wang, Shuzhong & Xu, Donghai & Chen, Hao & Zhang, Jie & Li, Guoxing, 2025. "Supercritical water gasification of palmitic acid: Products, pathway and kinetics," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    3. Zhang, Cunsheng & Su, Haijia & Baeyens, Jan & Tan, Tianwei, 2014. "Reviewing the anaerobic digestion of food waste for biogas production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 383-392.
    4. Dong, Runqiu & Jia, Hanbing & Tian, Jianghua & Wu, Liang & Liu, Zhigang & Peng, Zhiyong & Xu, Jialing & Luo, Kui & Jin, Hui & Chen, Bin & Guo, Liejin, 2025. "Thermodynamic analysis and life cycle assessment of the preferred supercritical water gasification coupled system for energy self-sufficiency: From food waste to hydrogen," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dilmaghani, Amirali & Saidi, Majid, 2026. "In-situ hydrodeoxygenation of anisole as a representative compound of bio-oil oxygenates to biofuel over Ni-Mo/γ-Al2O3 catalyst," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Yangyang & Jin, Yiying & Li, Hailong & Borrion, Aiduan & Yu, Zhixin & Li, Jinhui, 2018. "Kinetic studies on organic degradation and its impacts on improving methane production during anaerobic digestion of food waste," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 136-147.
    2. Ma, Chaonan & Liu, Jianyong & Ye, Min & Zou, Lianpei & Qian, Guangren & Li, Yu-You, 2018. "Towards utmost bioenergy conversion efficiency of food waste: Pretreatment, co-digestion, and reactor type," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 700-709.
    3. Negri, Camilla & Ricci, Marina & Zilio, Massimo & D'Imporzano, Giuliana & Qiao, Wei & Dong, Renjie & Adani, Fabrizio, 2020. "Anaerobic digestion of food waste for bio-energy production in China and Southeast Asia: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    4. Abhinav Choudhury & Stephanie Lansing, 2019. "Methane and Hydrogen Sulfide Production from Co-Digestion of Gummy Waste with a Food Waste, Grease Waste, and Dairy Manure Mixture," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-12, November.
    5. Zhang, Jingxin & Li, Wangliang & Lee, Jonathan & Loh, Kai-Chee & Dai, Yanjun & Tong, Yen Wah, 2017. "Enhancement of biogas production in anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and waste activated sludge by biological co-pretreatment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 479-486.
    6. Senghor, A. & Dioh, R.M.N. & Müller, C. & Youm, I., 2017. "Cereal crops for biogas production: A review of possible impact of elevated CO2," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 548-554.
    7. Pérez-Rodríguez, N. & García-Bernet, D. & Domínguez, J.M., 2017. "Extrusion and enzymatic hydrolysis as pretreatments on corn cob for biogas production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 597-603.
    8. Chowdhury, M.M.I. & Nakhla, G. & Zhu, J., 2017. "Ultrasonically enhanced anaerobic digestion of thickened waste activated sludge using fluidized bed reactors," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 807-818.
    9. Niu, Xian & Zhang, Jianbin & Suo, Yonglu & Fu, Jilagamazhi, 2022. "Proteomic analysis of Fusarium sp. NF01 revealed a multi-level regulatory machinery for lignite biodegradation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    10. Sun, Chihe & Xia, Ao & Liao, Qiang & Fu, Qian & Huang, Yun & Zhu, Xun, 2019. "Life-cycle assessment of biohythane production via two-stage anaerobic fermentation from microalgae and food waste," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 395-410.
    11. A. Sinan Akturk & Goksel N. Demirer, 2020. "Improved Food Waste Stabilization and Valorization by Anaerobic Digestion Through Supplementation of Conductive Materials and Trace Elements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-11, June.
    12. Zhang, Jingxin & Hu, Qiang & Qu, Yiyuan & Dai, Yanjun & He, Yiliang & Wang, Chi-Hwa & Tong, Yen Wah, 2020. "Integrating food waste sorting system with anaerobic digestion and gasification for hydrogen and methane co-production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    13. Awasthi, Mukesh Kumar & Ferreira, Jorge A. & Sirohi, Ranjna & Sarsaiya, Surendra & Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Baladi, Samin & Sindhu, Raveendran & Binod, Parameswaran & Pandey, Ashok & Juneja, Ankita & , 2021. "A critical review on the development stage of biorefinery systems towards the management of apple processing-derived waste," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    14. Salah Jellali & Yassine Charabi & Muhammad Usman & Abdullah Al-Badi & Mejdi Jeguirim, 2021. "Investigations on Biogas Recovery from Anaerobic Digestion of Raw Sludge and Its Mixture with Agri-Food Wastes: Application to the Largest Industrial Estate in Oman," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-20, March.
    15. Georgia-Christina Mitraka & Konstantinos N. Kontogiannopoulos & Maria Batsioula & George F. Banias & Anastasios I. Zouboulis & Panagiotis G. Kougias, 2022. "A Comprehensive Review on Pretreatment Methods for Enhanced Biogas Production from Sewage Sludge," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-56, September.
    16. Zhang, Cunsheng & Kang, Xinxin & Wang, Fenghuan & Tian, Yufei & Liu, Tao & Su, Yanyan & Qian, Tingting & Zhang, Yifeng, 2020. "Valorization of food waste for cost-effective reducing sugar recovery in a two-stage enzymatic hydrolysis platform," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    17. Kim, Jung-Hun & Oh, Jeong-Ik & Tsang, Yiu Fai & Park, Young-Kwon & Lee, Jechan & Kwon, Eilhann E., 2020. "CO2-assisted catalytic pyrolysis of digestate with steel slag," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    18. Zhang, Chen & Li, Tinggang & Su, Guandong & He, Jianzhong, 2020. "Enhanced direct fermentation from food waste to butanol and hydrogen by an amylolytic Clostridium," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 522-529.
    19. Jasmine Sie Ming Tiong & Yi Jing Chan & Jun Wei Lim & Mardawani Mohamad & Chii-Dong Ho & Anisa Ur Rahmah & Worapon Kiatkittipong & Wipoo Sriseubsai & Izumi Kumakiri, 2021. "Simulation and Optimization of Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Food Waste with Palm Oil Mill Effluent for Biogas Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-22, December.
    20. Wang, Haoqi & Zhang, Siduo & Bi, Xiaotao & Clift, Roland, 2020. "Greenhouse gas emission reduction potential and cost of bioenergy in British Columbia, Canada," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:256:y:2026:i:pf:s0960148125021378. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.