IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v254y2025ics0960148125013321.html

Photovoltaic power plants in mountainous area: Environmental impacts analysis based on random forest algorithm

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Jia
  • Ge, Yadong
  • Wang, Yibo
  • Tao, Junyu
  • Li, Zaixin
  • Fu, Shuang
  • Wang, Xingcan
  • Zhong, Yuzhen
  • Yan, Beibei
  • Chen, Guanyi

Abstract

The rapid growth of mountain photovoltaic (PV) plants has brought both environmental benefits and challenges. However, there is a lack of environmental impact prediction models for these plants, and existing models have limited predictive indicators, unable to differentiate between shaded and non-shaded areas of PV arrays. This study investigates the environmental impacts of a mountain PV plant in Hubei Province, China, and develops predictive models using 16 machine learning (ML) algorithms. Data collected over one year includes meteorological and soil parameters from shaded and non-shaded areas. The Random Forest (RF) model achieves the best performance, with R2values exceeding 0.90, particularly for soil temperature predictions (R2 > 0.99). Predictions show that the non-shaded area (IT) outperforms the shaded area (BL), as expected due to the absence of shading effects. Deep soil temperature shows the most stable prediction across both areas (R2 = 0.995). Soil electrical conductivity proves more challenging, but RF performs better in the IT site (R2 = 0.903) compared to the BL site (R2 = 0.880). This research improves existing environmental impact prediction models by incorporating more parameters and advanced ML techniques, supporting the sustainable development of solar energy systems and their integration with the environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Jia & Ge, Yadong & Wang, Yibo & Tao, Junyu & Li, Zaixin & Fu, Shuang & Wang, Xingcan & Zhong, Yuzhen & Yan, Beibei & Chen, Guanyi, 2025. "Photovoltaic power plants in mountainous area: Environmental impacts analysis based on random forest algorithm," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:254:y:2025:i:c:s0960148125013321
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2025.123670
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148125013321
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2025.123670?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liao, Qishu & Cao, Di & Chen, Zhe & Blaabjerg, Frede & Hu, Weihao, 2023. "Probabilistic wind power forecasting for newly-built wind farms based on multi-task Gaussian process method," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    2. Shorabeh, Saman Nadizadeh & Samany, Najmeh Neysani & Minaei, Foad & Firozjaei, Hamzeh Karimi & Homaee, Mehdi & Boloorani, Ali Darvishi, 2022. "A decision model based on decision tree and particle swarm optimization algorithms to identify optimal locations for solar power plants construction in Iran," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 56-67.
    3. Hernandez, R.R. & Easter, S.B. & Murphy-Mariscal, M.L. & Maestre, F.T. & Tavassoli, M. & Allen, E.B. & Barrows, C.W. & Belnap, J. & Ochoa-Hueso, R. & Ravi, S. & Allen, M.F., 2014. "Environmental impacts of utility-scale solar energy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 766-779.
    4. Meenal, R. & Selvakumar, A. Immanuel, 2018. "Assessment of SVM, empirical and ANN based solar radiation prediction models with most influencing input parameters," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 324-343.
    5. Cai, Haoshu & Jia, Xiaodong & Feng, Jianshe & Yang, Qibo & Li, Wenzhe & Li, Fei & Lee, Jay, 2021. "A unified Bayesian filtering framework for multi-horizon wind speed prediction with improved accuracy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 709-719.
    6. Tsoutsos, Theocharis & Frantzeskaki, Niki & Gekas, Vassilis, 2005. "Environmental impacts from the solar energy technologies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 289-296, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paweł Kut & Katarzyna Pietrucha-Urbanik, 2025. "Forecasting Short-Term Photovoltaic Energy Production to Optimize Self-Consumption in Home Systems Based on Real-World Meteorological Data and Machine Learning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-31, August.
    2. Seman, Laio Oriel & Stefenon, Stefano Frizzo & Yow, Kin-Choong & Coelho, Leandro dos Santos & Mariani, Viviana Cocco, 2026. "Multi-step short-term solar energy forecasting using Fourier-enhanced BiLSTM and neural additive models," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Frate, Claudio Albuquerque & Brannstrom, Christian, 2017. "Stakeholder subjectivities regarding barriers and drivers to the introduction of utility-scale solar photovoltaic power in Brazil," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 346-352.
    2. Prehoda, Emily W. & Pearce, Joshua M., 2017. "Potential lives saved by replacing coal with solar photovoltaic electricity production in the U.S," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 710-715.
    3. Ravi, Sujith & Macknick, Jordan & Lobell, David & Field, Christopher & Ganesan, Karthik & Jain, Rishabh & Elchinger, Michael & Stoltenberg, Blaise, 2016. "Colocation opportunities for large solar infrastructures and agriculture in drylands," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 383-392.
    4. Alexandra Vrînceanu & Ines Grigorescu & Monica Dumitrașcu & Irena Mocanu & Cristina Dumitrică & Dana Micu & Gheorghe Kucsicsa & Bianca Mitrică, 2019. "Impacts of Photovoltaic Farms on the Environment in the Romanian Plain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-18, July.
    5. Tammaro, Marco & Rimauro, Juri & Fiandra, Valeria & Salluzzo, Antonio, 2015. "Thermal treatment of waste photovoltaic module for recovery and recycling: Experimental assessment of the presence of metals in the gas emissions and in the ashes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 103-112.
    6. Botelho, Anabela & Lourenço-Gomes, Lina & Pinto, Lígia & Sousa, Sara & Valente, Marieta, 2017. "Accounting for local impacts of photovoltaic farms: The application of two stated preferences approaches to a case-study in Portugal," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 191-198.
    7. Fereshtehpour, Mohammad & Javidi Sabbaghian, Reza & Farrokhi, Ali & Jovein, Ehsan Bahrami & Ebrahimi Sarindizaj, Elham, 2021. "Evaluation of factors governing the use of floating solar system: A study on Iran’s important water infrastructures," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 1171-1187.
    8. Aman, M.M. & Solangi, K.H. & Hossain, M.S. & Badarudin, A. & Jasmon, G.B. & Mokhlis, H. & Bakar, A.H.A. & Kazi, S.N, 2015. "A review of Safety, Health and Environmental (SHE) issues of solar energy system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 1190-1204.
    9. Citlaly Pérez & Pedro Ponce & Alan Meier & Lourdes Dorantes & Jorge Omar Sandoval & Javier Palma & Arturo Molina, 2022. "S4 Framework for the Integration of Solar Energy Systems in Small and Medium-Sized Manufacturing Companies in Mexico," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-28, September.
    10. Scognamiglio, Alessandra, 2016. "‘Photovoltaic landscapes’: Design and assessment. A critical review for a new transdisciplinary design vision," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 629-661.
    11. Sulkan, Chitra & Sah, Dheeraj & Arya, Rahul & Thakur, Prashant Kumar & Sharma, Sudhir Kumar & Mandal, Tuhin Kumar & Yang, Rebecca & Kumar, Sushil, 2025. "Sustainable energy practices: Analysis of gases and particulate matter emissions during pyrolysis of polymeric layers of waste silicon solar panels for recycling process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 334(C).
    12. Visser, Elke & Perold, Vonica & Ralston-Paton, Samantha & Cardenal, Alvaro C. & Ryan, Peter G., 2019. "Assessing the impacts of a utility-scale photovoltaic solar energy facility on birds in the Northern Cape, South Africa," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 1285-1294.
    13. Bukhary, Saria & Ahmad, Sajjad & Batista, Jacimaria, 2018. "Analyzing land and water requirements for solar deployment in the Southwestern United States," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 3288-3305.
    14. Gasparatos, Alexandros & Doll, Christopher N.H. & Esteban, Miguel & Ahmed, Abubakari & Olang, Tabitha A., 2017. "Renewable energy and biodiversity: Implications for transitioning to a Green Economy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 161-184.
    15. Vaverková, Magdalena Daria & Winkler, Jan & Uldrijan, Dan & Ogrodnik, Paweł & Vespalcová, Tereza & Aleksiejuk-Gawron, Joanna & Adamcová, Dana & Koda, Eugeniusz, 2022. "Fire hazard associated with different types of photovoltaic power plants: Effect of vegetation management," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    16. Guerin, Turlough F., 2017. "Evaluating expected and comparing with observed risks on a large-scale solar photovoltaic construction project: A case for reducing the regulatory burden," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 333-348.
    17. Rahman, Abidur & Farrok, Omar & Haque, Md Mejbaul, 2022. "Environmental impact of renewable energy source based electrical power plants: Solar, wind, hydroelectric, biomass, geothermal, tidal, ocean, and osmotic," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    18. Sindhu, Sonal & Nehra, Vijay & Luthra, Sunil, 2017. "Solar energy deployment for sustainable future of India: Hybrid SWOC-AHP analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 1138-1151.
    19. Jeffrey Vervloesem & Ernesto Marcheggiani & MD Abdul Mueed Choudhury & Bart Muys, 2022. "Effects of Photovoltaic Solar Farms on Microclimate and Vegetation Diversity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-31, June.
    20. Sebestyén, Viktor, 2021. "Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews: Environmental impact networks of renewable energy power plants," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:254:y:2025:i:c:s0960148125013321. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.