IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v206y2023icp623-634.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Marine shell-based biorefinery: A sustainable solution for aquaculture waste valorization

Author

Listed:
  • Kiehbadroudinezhad, Mohammadali
  • Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, Homa
  • Varjani, Sunita
  • Wang, Yajing
  • Peng, Wanxi
  • Pan, Junting
  • Aghbashlo, Mortaza
  • Tabatabaei, Meisam

Abstract

Fossil-derived products contribute significantly to greenhouse gas emissions. Transitioning from fossil-based to bio-based products is an effective solution to this problem. There has been substantial research on how biorefinery systems can help achieve such an aim. Marine shell-based biorefinery systems have been proposed in the past, but their environmental sustainability has not been empirically proven. So, the current study examines the environmental impacts of chitosan production as a promising biomaterial in a lobster shell-based biorefinery. The life cycle assessment approach is used to estimate the environmental impact and cumulative exergy demand of chitosan production. The present study also aims at environmentally scrutinizing two non-commercial scenarios, i.e., the replacement of sodium hydroxide with potassium hydroxide (labeled as Scenario 1) and chitosan production based on the biological extraction of chitin and the replacement of sodium hydroxide with potassium hydroxide (labeled as Scenario 2) against the conventional chitosan production (labeled as the Base Scenario). The findings show that 1 kg of conventional chitosan production in the developed biorefinery leads to 8.75E-05 DALY damage to human health and 2.60E+02 PDF.m2.yr damage to ecosystem quality, mainly due to chitin and sodium hydroxide. In comparison, chitosan production based on Scenario 1 and Scenario 2 can lead to a 17% and 23% reduction in damage to human health and 6% and 11% in damage to ecosystem quality, respectively. The developed biorefinery produces chitosan with a weighted environmental impact of 43 EUR2003, which can be discounted by 8% and 13% using Scenario 1 and Scenario 2, respectively. The findings indicate that chitosan production eliminates 2.32E+02 MJ/FU exergy from nature, that approximately 54% of it is related to the “non-renewable, fossil” category. Scenarios 1 and 2 correspond to approximately a saving of 13% and a growth of 71% in exergy removal from nature than the Base scenario, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Kiehbadroudinezhad, Mohammadali & Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, Homa & Varjani, Sunita & Wang, Yajing & Peng, Wanxi & Pan, Junting & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Tabatabaei, Meisam, 2023. "Marine shell-based biorefinery: A sustainable solution for aquaculture waste valorization," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 623-634.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:206:y:2023:i:c:p:623-634
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2023.02.057
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096014812300201X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2023.02.057?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ning Yan & Xi Chen, 2015. "Sustainability: Don't waste seafood waste," Nature, Nature, vol. 524(7564), pages 155-157, August.
    2. Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Tabatabaei, Meisam & Tsapekos, Panagiotis & Rafiee, Shahin & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Lindeneg, Susanne & Angelidaki, Irini, 2020. "Environmental life cycle assessment of different biorefinery platforms valorizing municipal solid waste to bioenergy, microbial protein, lactic and succinic acid," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    3. Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, Homa & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Kalogirou, Soteris A. & Gupta, Vijai Kumar & Park, Young-Kwon & Fallahi, Alireza & Sulaiman, Alawi & Ranjbari, Meisam & Rahnama, Hassan & Aghbashl, 2022. "Environmental life cycle assessment of biodiesel production from waste cooking oil: A systematic review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    4. Larnaudie, Valeria & Ferrari, Mario Daniel & Lareo, Claudia, 2021. "Life cycle assessment of ethanol produced in a biorefinery from liquid hot water pretreated switchgrass," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 606-616.
    5. Brassard, P. & Godbout, S. & Hamelin, L., 2021. "Framework for consequential life cycle assessment of pyrolysis biorefineries: A case study for the conversion of primary forestry residues," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    6. Gnansounou, Edgard & Kenthorai Raman, Jegannathan, 2016. "Life cycle assessment of algae biodiesel and its co-products," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 300-308.
    7. Mohammadali Kiehbadroudinezhad & Adel Merabet & Ahmed G. Abo-Khalil & Tareq Salameh & Chaouki Ghenai, 2022. "Intelligent and Optimized Microgrids for Future Supply Power from Renewable Energy Resources: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-21, May.
    8. Mohammadali Kiehbadroudinezhad & Adel Merabet & Homa Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, 2021. "Optimization of Wind Energy Battery Storage Microgrid by Division Algorithm Considering Cumulative Exergy Demand for Power-Water Cogeneration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-20, June.
    9. Mirmohamadsadeghi, Safoora & Karimi, Keikhosro & Azarbaijani, Reza & Parsa Yeganeh, Laleh & Angelidaki, Irini & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Bhat, Rajeev & Dashora, Kavya & Vijay, Virendra Kumar & Aghbashlo, 2021. "Pretreatment of lignocelluloses for enhanced biogas production: A review on influencing mechanisms and the importance of microbial diversity," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    10. Ehtiwesh, Ismael A.S. & Coelho, Margarida C. & Sousa, Antonio C.M., 2016. "Exergetic and environmental life cycle assessment analysis of concentrated solar power plants," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 145-155.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yek, Peter Nai Yuh & Cheng, Yoke Wang & Liew, Rock Keey & Wan Mahari, Wan Adibah & Ong, Hwai Chyuan & Chen, Wei-Hsin & Peng, Wanxi & Park, Young-Kwon & Sonne, Christian & Kong, Sieng Huat & Tabatabaei, 2021. "Progress in the torrefaction technology for upgrading oil palm wastes to energy-dense biochar: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    2. Gurunathan Manikandan & P. Rajesh Kanna & Dawid Taler & Tomasz Sobota, 2023. "Review of Waste Cooking Oil (WCO) as a Feedstock for Biofuel—Indian Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-17, February.
    3. Hale Bakır & Adel Merabet & Mohammadali Kiehbadroudinezhad, 2023. "Optimized Control of a Hybrid Water Pumping System Integrated with Solar Photovoltaic and Battery Storage: Towards Sustainable and Green Water-Power Supply," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-16, July.
    4. Elsayed, Mahdy & Li, Wu & Abdalla, Nashwa S. & Ai, Ping & Zhang, Yanlin & Abomohra, Abd El-Fatah, 2022. "Innovative approach for rapeseed straw recycling using black solider fly larvae: Towards enhanced energy recovery," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 211-222.
    5. Mohammadali Kiehbadroudinezhad & Adel Merabet & Homa Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, 2022. "Review of Latest Advances and Prospects of Energy Storage Systems: Considering Economic, Reliability, Sizing, and Environmental Impacts Approach," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-25, June.
    6. Zalazar-Garcia, Daniela & Fernandez, Anabel & Rodriguez-Ortiz, Leandro & Torres, Erick & Reyes-Urrutia, Andrés & Echegaray, Marcelo & Rodriguez, Rosa & Mazza, Germán, 2022. "Exergo-ecological analysis and life cycle assessment of agro-wastes using a combined simulation approach based on Cape-Open to Cape-Open (COCO) and SimaPro free-software," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(P1), pages 60-71.
    7. Diego Alexis Ramos Huarachi & Cleiton Hluszko & Micaela Ines Castillo Ulloa & Vinicius Moretti & Julio Abraham Ramos Quispe & Fabio Neves Puglieri & Antonio Carlos de Francisco, 2023. "Life Cycle Thinking for a Circular Bioeconomy: Current Development, Challenges, and Future Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-27, May.
    8. Escobar, Neus & Laibach, Natalie, 2021. "Sustainability check for bio-based technologies: A review of process-based and life cycle approaches," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    9. Tsapekos, Panagiotis & Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Alvarado-Morales, Merlin & Zhu, Xinyu & Pan, Junting & Tian, Hailin & Angelidaki, Irini, 2021. "Upcycling the anaerobic digestion streams in a bioeconomy approach: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    10. Kumari, Rajni & Kumar, Manish & Vivekanand, V. & Pareek, Nidhi, 2023. "Chitin biorefinery: A narrative and prophecy of crustacean shell waste sustainable transformation into bioactives and renewable energy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    11. Sánchez-Bayo, Alejandra & López-Chicharro, Daniel & Morales, Victoria & Espada, Juan José & Puyol, Daniel & Martínez, Fernando & Astals, Sergi & Vicente, Gemma & Bautista, Luis Fernando & Rodríguez, R, 2020. "Biodiesel and biogas production from Isochrysis galbana using dry and wet lipid extraction: A biorefinery approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 188-195.
    12. Sundar, L. Syam & Singh, Manoj K. & Punnaiah, V. & Sousa, Antonio C.M., 2018. "Experimental investigation of Al2O3/water nanofluids on the effectiveness of solar flat-plate collectors with and without twisted tape inserts," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 820-833.
    13. Kiehbadroudinezhad, Mohammadali & Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, Homa & Pan, Junting & Peng, Wanxi & Wang, Yajing & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Tabatabaei, Meisam, 2023. "The potential of aquatic weed as a resource for sustainable bioenergy sources and bioproducts production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PA).
    14. Andrzej Ożadowicz & Gabriela Walczyk, 2023. "Energy Performance and Control Strategy for Dynamic Façade with Perovskite PV Panels—Technical Analysis and Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-23, April.
    15. Zhang, Huaiwen & Yao, Yiqing & Deng, Jun & Zhang, Jian-Li & Qiu, Yaojing & Li, Guofu & Liu, Jian, 2022. "Hydrogen production via anaerobic digestion of coal modified by white-rot fungi and its application benefits analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    16. Soltanian, Salman & Kalogirou, Soteris A. & Ranjbari, Meisam & Amiri, Hamid & Mahian, Omid & Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Jafary, Tahereh & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Gupta, Vijai Kumar & Aghaei, Siavash & Pe, 2022. "Exergetic sustainability analysis of municipal solid waste treatment systems: A systematic critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    17. Andrzej Ożadowicz, 2023. "Technical, Qualitative and Energy Analysis of Wireless Control Modules for Distributed Smart Home Systems," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-21, September.
    18. Pranav Nakhate & Yvonne van der Meer, 2021. "A Systematic Review on Seaweed Functionality: A Sustainable Bio-Based Material," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-26, May.
    19. Maria Hasnain & Neelma Munir & Zainul Abideen & Heather Macdonald & Maria Hamid & Zaheer Abbas & Ali El-Keblawy & Roberto Mancinelli & Emanuele Radicetti, 2023. "Prospects for Biodiesel Production from Emerging Algal Resource: Process Optimization and Characterization of Biodiesel Properties," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-29, February.
    20. Wang, Xuezhi & Lei, Zhongfang & Shimizu, Kazuya & Zhang, Zhenya & Lee, Duu-Jong, 2021. "Recent advancements in nanobubble water technology and its application in energy recovery from organic solid wastes towards a greater environmental friendliness of anaerobic digestion system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:206:y:2023:i:c:p:623-634. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.