IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v203y2023icp345-356.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of the hail impacts on the performance of commercially available photovoltaic modules of varying front glass thickness

Author

Listed:
  • Chakraborty, Suprava
  • Haldkar, Avinash Kumar
  • Manoj Kumar, Nallapaneni

Abstract

Hail has a significant impact on the output of photovoltaic (PV) modules. Hence, this paper aims to give complete understanding of hail impacts on PV modules performance analytically and experimentally. The investigation was carried out followed the guidelines as prescribed by the IEC 61215–2:2016/IS 14286: 2019 standard on three PV modules of different thicknesses (2.8 mm, 3 mm, 4 mm) of the front glass. Hail size has been varied from 25 mm to 55 mm, the variation in weight of the ice ball is 7.5 gm to 80 gm, and the variation in speed of the ice ball is from 23 m/s to 34 m/s. After each round of the hail test, the samples are tested for Standard Test Condition (STC), Insulation Test (IT) and Wet Leakage Current Test (WLCT). In addition to measuring electric power output, an electroluminescence (EL) inspection of the cracks of the PV module has been performed. The scientific novelty is the optimization of the PV module based on experimental data under hail tests. Results show that the there is a continuous irreversible effect of the excitation force on the PV modules in the event of hail, and it can reduce the power output. Parametric analysis reveals that the glass thickness of 4 mm is sufficient to withstand severe damage; sample 3 only loses 1.1% of its power output compared to the initial value. However, samples 1 and 2 lose 21.8% and 11.74%, respectively. The insulating resistance of the samples appears to be decreasing with each round of the testing. The % reduction in wet leakage current resistance with respect to the initial value for samples 1, 2 and 3 are 55.25%, 46.81% and 27.23%, respectively. Lesser decrement in wet leakage current resistance indicates that sample 3 is more reliable for the hail-prone area. According to the findings, PV modules with a front glass thickness of 3.2 mm are exemplary when hit by hail up to 35 mm in diameter at a velocity of 27 m/s. However, in hail-prone areas, installers should choose PV modules with a front glass thickness of 4 mm or higher to minimize or eliminate hail damage.

Suggested Citation

  • Chakraborty, Suprava & Haldkar, Avinash Kumar & Manoj Kumar, Nallapaneni, 2023. "Analysis of the hail impacts on the performance of commercially available photovoltaic modules of varying front glass thickness," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 345-356.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:203:y:2023:i:c:p:345-356
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2022.12.061
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148122018468
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2022.12.061?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nallapaneni Manoj Kumar & Shauhrat S. Chopra & Maria Malvoni & Rajvikram Madurai Elavarasan & Narottam Das, 2020. "Solar Cell Technology Selection for a PV Leaf Based on Energy and Sustainability Indicators—A Case of a Multilayered Solar Photovoltaic Tree," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-26, December.
    2. Julián Ascencio-Vásquez & Ismail Kaaya & Kristijan Brecl & Karl-Anders Weiss & Marko Topič, 2019. "Global Climate Data Processing and Mapping of Degradation Mechanisms and Degradation Rates of PV Modules," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Muehleisen, Wolfgang & Eder, Gabriele C. & Voronko, Yuliya & Spielberger, Markus & Sonnleitner, Horst & Knoebl, Karl & Ebner, Rita & Ujvari, Gusztav & Hirschl, Christina, 2018. "Outdoor detection and visualization of hailstorm damages of photovoltaic plants," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 138-145.
    4. Papargyri, Lamprini & Theristis, Marios & Kubicek, Bernhard & Krametz, Thomas & Mayr, Christoph & Papanastasiou, Panos & Georghiou, George E., 2020. "Modelling and experimental investigations of microcracks in crystalline silicon photovoltaics: A review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 2387-2408.
    5. Manganiello, Patrizio & Govaerts, Jonathan & Horvath, Imre T. & Chowdhury, Mohammed Gofran & Yordanov, Georgi H. & Goverde, Hans & Aldalali, Bader & Beausoleil-Morrison, Ian & Valkealahti, Seppo & Lap, 2020. "Tuning electricity generation throughout the year with PV module technology," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 418-427.
    6. Kichou, Sofiane & Silvestre, Santiago & Nofuentes, Gustavo & Torres-Ramírez, Miguel & Chouder, Aissa & Guasch, Daniel, 2016. "Characterization of degradation and evaluation of model parameters of amorphous silicon photovoltaic modules under outdoor long term exposure," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 231-241.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tuhibur Rahman & Ahmed Al Mansur & Molla Shahadat Hossain Lipu & Md. Siddikur Rahman & Ratil H. Ashique & Mohamad Abou Houran & Rajvikram Madurai Elavarasan & Eklas Hossain, 2023. "Investigation of Degradation of Solar Photovoltaics: A Review of Aging Factors, Impacts, and Future Directions toward Sustainable Energy Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-30, April.
    2. Høiaas, Ingeborg & Grujic, Katarina & Imenes, Anne Gerd & Burud, Ingunn & Olsen, Espen & Belbachir, Nabil, 2022. "Inspection and condition monitoring of large-scale photovoltaic power plants: A review of imaging technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    3. Waqar Akram, M. & Li, Guiqiang & Jin, Yi & Chen, Xiao, 2022. "Failures of Photovoltaic modules and their Detection: A Review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
    4. Gorjian, Shiva & Bousi, Erion & Özdemir, Özal Emre & Trommsdorff, Max & Kumar, Nallapaneni Manoj & Anand, Abhishek & Kant, Karunesh & Chopra, Shauhrat S., 2022. "Progress and challenges of crop production and electricity generation in agrivoltaic systems using semi-transparent photovoltaic technology," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    5. Liang, Tao & Fu, Tong & Hu, Cong & Chen, Xiaohang & Su, Shanhe & Chen, Jincan, 2021. "Optimum matching of photovoltaic–thermophotovoltaic cells efficiently utilizing full-spectrum solar energy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 942-952.
    6. Dhimish, Mahmoud & Ahmad, Ameer & Tyrrell, Andy M., 2022. "Inequalities in photovoltaics modules reliability: From packaging to PV installation site," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 805-814.
    7. Gabriele C. Eder & Yuliya Voronko & Christina Hirschl & Rita Ebner & Gusztáv Újvári & Wolfgang Mühleisen, 2018. "Non-Destructive Failure Detection and Visualization of Artificially and Naturally Aged PV Modules," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-14, April.
    8. Santhakumari, Manju & Sagar, Netramani, 2019. "A review of the environmental factors degrading the performance of silicon wafer-based photovoltaic modules: Failure detection methods and essential mitigation techniques," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 83-100.
    9. Rajput, Pramod & Tiwari, G.N. & Sastry, O.S., 2017. "Thermal modelling with experimental validation and economic analysis of mono crystalline silicon photovoltaic module on the basis of degradation study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 731-739.
    10. Wang, Jing-Yi & Qian, Zheng & Zareipour, Hamidreza & Wood, David, 2018. "Performance assessment of photovoltaic modules based on daily energy generation estimation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 1160-1172.
    11. Julián Ascencio-Vásquez & Jakob Bevc & Kristjan Reba & Kristijan Brecl & Marko Jankovec & Marko Topič, 2020. "Advanced PV Performance Modelling Based on Different Levels of Irradiance Data Accuracy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-12, May.
    12. Vasileios Kapsalis & Grigorios Kyriakopoulos & Miltiadis Zamparas & Athanasios Tolis, 2021. "Investigation of the Photon to Charge Conversion and Its Implication on Photovoltaic Cell Efficient Operation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-16, May.
    13. Li, Chenxi & Yang, Yongheng & Spataru, Sergiu & Zhang, Kanjian & Wei, Haikun, 2021. "A robust parametrization method of photovoltaic modules for enhancing one-diode model accuracy under varying operating conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 764-778.
    14. Mathhar Bdour & Zakariya Dalala & Mohammad Al-Addous & Ashraf Radaideh & Aseel Al-Sadi, 2020. "A Comprehensive Evaluation on Types of Microcracks and Possible Effects on Power Degradation in Photovoltaic Solar Panels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-22, August.
    15. Gianfranco Di Lorenzo & Erika Stracqualursi & Leonardo Micheli & Salvatore Celozzi & Rodolfo Araneo, 2022. "Prognostic Methods for Photovoltaic Systems’ Underperformance and Degradation: Status, Perspectives, and Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-6, September.
    16. Alexander Frick & George Makrides & Markus Schubert & Matthias Schlecht & George E. Georghiou, 2020. "Degradation Rate Location Dependency of Photovoltaic Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-20, December.
    17. Bouraiou, Ahmed & Hamouda, Messaoud & Chaker, Abdelkader & Lachtar, Salah & Neçaibia, Ammar & Boutasseta, Nadir & Mostefaoui, Mohammed, 2017. "Experimental evaluation of the performance and degradation of single crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules in the Saharan environment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 22-30.
    18. Ricardo A. Marques Lameirinhas & João Paulo N. Torres & João P. de Melo Cunha, 2022. "A Photovoltaic Technology Review: History, Fundamentals and Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-44, March.
    19. Ustun, Taha Selim & Nakamura, Yasuhiro & Hashimoto, Jun & Otani, Kenji, 2019. "Performance analysis of PV panels based on different technologies after two years of outdoor exposure in Fukushima, Japan," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 159-178.
    20. Singh, Rashmi & Sharma, Madhu & Rawat, Rahul & Banerjee, Chandan, 2018. "An assessment of series resistance estimation techniques for different silicon based SPV modules," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 199-216.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:203:y:2023:i:c:p:345-356. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.