IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v154y2020icp1025-1034.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling a novel combined solid oxide electrolysis cell (SOEC) - Biomass gasification renewable methanol production system

Author

Listed:
  • Ali, Shahid
  • Sørensen, Kim
  • Nielsen, Mads P.

Abstract

Chemical energy storage in the form of hydrogen is playing an important role in the synthesis of alternative energy carriers such as Synthetic Natural Gas (SNG), Methanol and Dimethyl ether (DME) supplementing with a carbon source. The only renewable carbon source is biomass, which is a limited resource. However, the addition of hydrogen could potentially extend the existing biomass resources. This paper describes the modeling of a novel combined Solid Oxide Electrolysis Cell (SOEC) and oxygen blown biomass gasification system using Aspen Plus. One of the advantages of using such a combined system is the use of oxygen for gasification and reforming. The comparison of reforming technologies showed that an autothermal reformer (ATR) could be an advantage since oxygen is already available from the electrolysis stack and the ATR produced syngas has a higher CO/CO2 ratio, which increases the methanol synthesis’s reaction rate. ATR requires much less energy ∼13 MW for almost complete methane conversion compared to ∼35 MW for Steam Reforming (SR). The advantage of using inter-cooled compression upstream or downstream for such a combined process has been explained. A methanol thermal conversion efficiency of 72.08% can be achieved for gasification and SOEC combined system compared to 55.7% for an only gasifier system.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali, Shahid & Sørensen, Kim & Nielsen, Mads P., 2020. "Modeling a novel combined solid oxide electrolysis cell (SOEC) - Biomass gasification renewable methanol production system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 1025-1034.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:154:y:2020:i:c:p:1025-1034
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.12.108
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148119319809
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2019.12.108?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Clausen, Lasse R. & Houbak, Niels & Elmegaard, Brian, 2010. "Technoeconomic analysis of a methanol plant based on gasification of biomass and electrolysis of water," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 2338-2347.
    2. Puig-Arnavat, Maria & Bruno, Joan Carles & Coronas, Alberto, 2010. "Review and analysis of biomass gasification models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(9), pages 2841-2851, December.
    3. Ghaib, Karim & Ben-Fares, Fatima-Zahrae, 2018. "Power-to-Methane: A state-of-the-art review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 433-446.
    4. Cinti, Giovanni & Baldinelli, Arianna & Di Michele, Alessandro & Desideri, Umberto, 2016. "Integration of Solid Oxide Electrolyzer and Fischer-Tropsch: A sustainable pathway for synthetic fuel," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 308-320.
    5. Becker, W.L. & Braun, R.J. & Penev, M. & Melaina, M., 2012. "Production of Fischer–Tropsch liquid fuels from high temperature solid oxide co-electrolysis units," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 99-115.
    6. Andika, Riezqa & Nandiyanto, Asep Bayu Dani & Putra, Zulfan Adi & Bilad, Muhammad Roil & Kim, Young & Yun, Choa Mun & Lee, Moonyong, 2018. "Co-electrolysis for power-to-methanol applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 227-241.
    7. Kato, Takeyoshi & Kubota, Mitsuhiro & Kobayashi, Noriyuki & Suzuoki, Yasuo, 2005. "Effective utilization of by-product oxygen from electrolysis hydrogen production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 30(14), pages 2580-2595.
    8. Sharmina Begum & Mohammad G. Rasul & Delwar Akbar & Naveed Ramzan, 2013. "Performance Analysis of an Integrated Fixed Bed Gasifier Model for Different Biomass Feedstocks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(12), pages 1-17, December.
    9. Andresen, Gorm B. & Rodriguez, Rolando A. & Becker, Sarah & Greiner, Martin, 2014. "The potential for arbitrage of wind and solar surplus power in Denmark," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 49-58.
    10. Chutichai, Bhawasut & Patcharavorachot, Yaneeporn & Assabumrungrat, Suttichai & Arpornwichanop, Amornchai, 2015. "Parametric analysis of a circulating fluidized bed biomass gasifier for hydrogen production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 406-413.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xia, Qi & Zhao, Jianguo & Chen, Chen & Jin, Weiya, 2023. "Modeling of CO2/H2O Co-electrolysis using solar-driven SOEC coupled with ammonia-based chemical heat pump," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 128-137.
    2. Pang, Kang Ying & Liew, Peng Yen & Woon, Kok Sin & Ho, Wai Shin & Wan Alwi, Sharifah Rafidah & Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír, 2023. "Multi-period multi-objective optimisation model for multi-energy urban-industrial symbiosis with heat, cooling, power and hydrogen demands," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PA).
    3. xu, Guiying & Qian, Haifeng & Zhang, Qi & R Alsenani, Theyab & Bouzgarrou, Souhail & Alturise, Fahad, 2024. "Integration of biomass gasification and O2/H2 separation membranes for H2 production/separation with inherent CO2 capture: Techno-economic evaluation and artificial neural network based multi-objectiv," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    4. Li, Huabin & Tao, Ye & Zhang, Yang & Fu, Hong, 2022. "Two-objective optimization of a hybrid solar-geothermal system with thermal energy storage for power, hydrogen and freshwater production based on transcritical CO2 cycle," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 51-66.
    5. Kim, Heehyang & Kim, Ayeon & Byun, Manhee & Lim, Hankwon, 2021. "Comparative feasibility studies of H2 supply scenarios for methanol as a carbon-neutral H2 carrier at various scales and distances," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 552-559.
    6. Adnan, Muflih A. & Kibria, Md Golam, 2020. "Comparative techno-economic and life-cycle assessment of power-to-methanol synthesis pathways," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    7. Xin, Yu & Xing, Xueli & Li, Xiang & Hong, Hui, 2024. "A biomass–solar hybrid gasification system by solar pyrolysis and PV– Solid oxide electrolysis cell for sustainable fuel production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 356(C).
    8. Tabibian, Seyed Shayan & Sharifzadeh, Mahdi, 2023. "Statistical and analytical investigation of methanol applications, production technologies, value-chain and economy with a special focus on renewable methanol," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    9. Dossow, Marcel & Dieterich, Vincent & Hanel, Andreas & Spliethoff, Hartmut & Fendt, Sebastian, 2021. "Improving carbon efficiency for an advanced Biomass-to-Liquid process using hydrogen and oxygen from electrolysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Hanfei & Desideri, Umberto, 2020. "Techno-economic optimization of power-to-methanol with co-electrolysis of CO2 and H2O in solid-oxide electrolyzers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    2. Katla, Daria & Jurczyk, Michał & Skorek-Osikowska, Anna & Uchman, Wojciech, 2021. "Analysis of the integrated system of electrolysis and methanation units for the production of synthetic natural gas (SNG)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    3. Olateju, Babatunde & Kumar, Amit, 2011. "Hydrogen production from wind energy in Western Canada for upgrading bitumen from oil sands," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 6326-6339.
    4. Chen, Bin & Xu, Haoran & Ni, Meng, 2017. "Modelling of SOEC-FT reactor: Pressure effects on methanation process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P1), pages 814-824.
    5. Freire Ordóñez, Diego & Shah, Nilay & Guillén-Gosálbez, Gonzalo, 2021. "Economic and full environmental assessment of electrofuels via electrolysis and co-electrolysis considering externalities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 286(C).
    6. Shahbaz, Muhammad & Al-Ansari, Tareq & Inayat, Muddasser & Sulaiman, Shaharin A. & Parthasarathy, Prakash & McKay, Gordon, 2020. "A critical review on the influence of process parameters in catalytic co-gasification: Current performance and challenges for a future prospectus," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    7. Mehran, Muhammad Taqi & Yu, Seong-Bin & Lee, Dong-Young & Hong, Jong-Eun & Lee, Seung-Bok & Park, Seok-Joo & Song, Rak-Hyun & Lim, Tak-Hyoung, 2018. "Production of syngas from H2O/CO2 by high-pressure coelectrolysis in tubular solid oxide cells," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 759-770.
    8. Ajaree Suwatthikul & Siripong Limprachaya & Paisan Kittisupakorn & Iqbal Mohammed Mujtaba, 2017. "Simulation of Steam Gasification in a Fluidized Bed Reactor with Energy Self-Sufficient Condition," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-15, March.
    9. Herz, Gregor & Rix, Christopher & Jacobasch, Eric & Müller, Nils & Reichelt, Erik & Jahn, Matthias & Michaelis, Alexander, 2021. "Economic assessment of Power-to-Liquid processes – Influence of electrolysis technology and operating conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    10. Herz, Gregor & Reichelt, Erik & Jahn, Matthias, 2018. "Techno-economic analysis of a co-electrolysis-based synthesis process for the production of hydrocarbons," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 309-320.
    11. Domenico Borello & Antonio M. Pantaleo & Michele Caucci & Benedetta De Caprariis & Paolo De Filippis & Nilay Shah, 2017. "Modeling and Experimental Study of a Small Scale Olive Pomace Gasifier for Cogeneration: Energy and Profitability Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-17, November.
    12. Morgenthaler, Simon & Kuckshinrichs, Wilhelm & Witthaut, Dirk, 2020. "Optimal system layout and locations for fully renewable high temperature co-electrolysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    13. Eveloy, Valerie, 2019. "Hybridization of solid oxide electrolysis-based power-to-methane with oxyfuel combustion and carbon dioxide utilization for energy storage," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 550-571.
    14. Kotowicz, J. & Brzęczek, M., 2021. "Methods to increase the efficiency of production and purification installations of renewable methanol," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 568-583.
    15. Jalili, Mohammad & Ghazanfari Holagh, Shahriyar & Chitsaz, Ata & Song, Jian & Markides, Christos N., 2023. "Electrolyzer cell-methanation/Sabatier reactors integration for power-to-gas energy storage: Thermo-economic analysis and multi-objective optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 329(C).
    16. Samuel Simon Araya & Vincenzo Liso & Xiaoti Cui & Na Li & Jimin Zhu & Simon Lennart Sahlin & Søren Højgaard Jensen & Mads Pagh Nielsen & Søren Knudsen Kær, 2020. "A Review of The Methanol Economy: The Fuel Cell Route," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-32, January.
    17. Vera Marcantonio & Michael Müller & Enrico Bocci, 2021. "A Review of Hot Gas Cleaning Techniques for Hydrogen Chloride Removal from Biomass-Derived Syngas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-15, October.
    18. Guerra, L. & Gomes, J. & Puna, J. & Rodrigues, J., 2015. "Preliminary study of synthesis gas production from water electrolysis, using the ELECTROFUEL® concept," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 1050-1056.
    19. Albrecht, Friedemann Georg & Nguyen, Tuong-Van, 2020. "Prospects of electrofuels to defossilize transportation in Denmark – A techno-economic and ecological analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    20. Simon Pratschner & Martin Hammerschmid & Florian J. Müller & Stefan Müller & Franz Winter, 2022. "Simulation of a Pilot Scale Power-to-Liquid Plant Producing Synthetic Fuel and Wax by Combining Fischer–Tropsch Synthesis and SOEC," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-22, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:154:y:2020:i:c:p:1025-1034. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.