IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v248y2024ics0951832024002564.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial-temporal modeling of oil condition monitoring: A review

Author

Listed:
  • Pan, Yan
  • Liang, Bin
  • Yang, Lei
  • Liu, Houde
  • Wu, Tonghai
  • Wang, Shuo

Abstract

Lubricating oil plays a vital role as the information carrier for equipment tribological performance. Therefore, oil condition monitoring (OCM) serves as a crucial technology for assessing and predicting state degradation, providing the first-line defense against functional failure. However, limited by random fluctuation and insufficient knowledge, the modeling of OCM has suffered from uncertainty problems, leading to poor applicability and insufficient generalizability. The existing reviews are less elaborated on the information uncertainty for description, characterization, and treatment, which expresses the essence of modeling constraints. To bridge this gap, the paper provides a comprehensive review of the oil state modeling in terms of uncertainty. The existing methods and metrics are reviewed from the perspective of the spatial oil state assessment (OCA) and temporal remaining useful life (RUL) prediction modeling. Further, the existing methods are analyzed to solve the uncertainty problem, and then the solutions in oil state modeling considering uncertainty are discussed. Finally, targeting the challenges of the monitoring technology, the future trends of OCM are presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Pan, Yan & Liang, Bin & Yang, Lei & Liu, Houde & Wu, Tonghai & Wang, Shuo, 2024. "Spatial-temporal modeling of oil condition monitoring: A review," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:248:y:2024:i:c:s0951832024002564
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2024.110182
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832024002564
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2024.110182?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:248:y:2024:i:c:s0951832024002564. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.