IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v226y2022ics0951832022003027.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantifying the value of negative inspection outcomes in fatigue maintenance planning: Cost reduction, risk mitigation and reliability growth

Author

Listed:
  • Zou, Guang
  • Kolios, Athanasios

Abstract

With the development of sensing, non-destructive evaluation and information technology, benefits of informed structural maintenance decision-making based on systematic decision analysis have been increasingly appreciated and required. This tendency necessitates methods for quantifying the value of information (VoI) provided by condition inspections (or monitoring) and fully utilizing the VoI, i.e., transforming information into improved maintenance decisions that add value. While positive inspection outcomes are often considered as indicators for maintenance actions, implications of negative outcomes on reliability, risk and costs are seldom quantified. The objective of this study is to investigate potential benefits of negative outcomes to maintenance costs, failure risk and reliability from a maintenance planning perspective by developing a probabilistic VoI computational method. A structural maintenance decision-making framework and a VoI computational method are developed, considering uncertainties associated with structural deterioration forecast and inspection outcomes. For the first time, influences of maintenance effect modeling on VoI computation are investigated. The framework and method are illustrated on a marine structure. It is concluded that the VoI from negative outcomes can be attributed to reductions of both maintenance costs and failure risk, especially when high-quality inspection techniques are used and maintenance effects are imperfect.

Suggested Citation

  • Zou, Guang & Kolios, Athanasios, 2022. "Quantifying the value of negative inspection outcomes in fatigue maintenance planning: Cost reduction, risk mitigation and reliability growth," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:226:y:2022:i:c:s0951832022003027
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2022.108668
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832022003027
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2022.108668?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Khac Tuan Huynh & Inma T. Castro & Anne Barros & Christophe Bérenguer, 2012. "Modeling age-based maintenance strategies with minimal repairs for systems subject to competing failure modes due to degradation and shocks," Post-Print hal-00790729, HAL.
    2. Zhang, Mimi & Gaudoin, Olivier & Xie, Min, 2015. "Degradation-based maintenance decision using stochastic filtering for systems under imperfect maintenance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(2), pages 531-541.
    3. Malings, C. & Pozzi, M., 2019. "Submodularity issues in value-of-information-based sensor placement," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 93-103.
    4. Khac Tuan Huynh & Anne Barros & Christophe Bérenguer & Inma T. Castro, 2011. "A periodic inspection and replacement policy for systems subject to competing failure modes due to degradation and traumatic events," Post-Print hal-00790728, HAL.
    5. Zou, Guang & Faber, Michael Havbro & González, Arturo & Banisoleiman, Kian, 2021. "Computing the value of information from periodic testing in holistic decision making under uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    6. Huynh, K.T. & Barros, A. & Bérenguer, C. & Castro, I.T., 2011. "A periodic inspection and replacement policy for systems subject to competing failure modes due to degradation and traumatic events," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(4), pages 497-508.
    7. Huynh, K.T. & Castro, I.T. & Barros, A. & Bérenguer, C., 2012. "Modeling age-based maintenance strategies with minimal repairs for systems subject to competing failure modes due to degradation and shocks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 218(1), pages 140-151.
    8. Malings, C. & Pozzi, M., 2018. "Value-of-information in spatio-temporal systems: Sensor placement and scheduling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 45-57.
    9. Do, Phuc & Voisin, Alexandre & Levrat, Eric & Iung, Benoit, 2015. "A proactive condition-based maintenance strategy with both perfect and imperfect maintenance actions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 22-32.
    10. Adedipe, Oyewole & Brennan, Feargal & Kolios, Athanasios, 2016. "Review of corrosion fatigue in offshore structures: Present status and challenges in the offshore wind sector," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 141-154.
    11. Memarzadeh, Milad & Pozzi, Matteo, 2016. "Value of information in sequential decision making: Component inspection, permanent monitoring and system-level scheduling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 137-151.
    12. Zitrou, A. & Bedford, T. & Daneshkhah, A., 2013. "Robustness of maintenance decisions: Uncertainty modelling and value of information," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 60-71.
    13. Huynh, K.T. & Grall, A. & Bérenguer, C., 2017. "Assessment of diagnostic and prognostic condition indices for efficient and robust maintenance decision-making of systems subject to stress corrosion cracking," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 237-254.
    14. Sheils, Emma & O’Connor, Alan & Breysse, Denys & Schoefs, Franck & Yotte, Sylvie, 2010. "Development of a two-stage inspection process for the assessment of deteriorating infrastructure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 182-194.
    15. Yeter, B. & Garbatov, Y. & Guedes Soares, C., 2020. "Risk-based maintenance planning of offshore wind turbine farms," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    16. Decò, Alberto & Frangopol, Dan M., 2013. "Risk-informed optimal routing of ships considering different damage scenarios and operational conditions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 126-140.
    17. Zio, Enrico & Compare, Michele, 2013. "Evaluating maintenance policies by quantitative modeling and analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 53-65.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kapoor, Medha & Christensen, Christian Overgaard & Schmidt, Jacob Wittrup & Sørensen, John Dalsgaard & Thöns, Sebastian, 2023. "Decision analytic approach for the reclassification of concrete bridges by using elastic limit information from proof loading," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alaswad, Suzan & Xiang, Yisha, 2017. "A review on condition-based maintenance optimization models for stochastically deteriorating system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 54-63.
    2. de Jonge, Bram & Scarf, Philip A., 2020. "A review on maintenance optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 805-824.
    3. de Jonge, Bram & Teunter, Ruud & Tinga, Tiedo, 2017. "The influence of practical factors on the benefits of condition-based maintenance over time-based maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 21-30.
    4. Song, Chaolin & Zhang, Chi & Shafieezadeh, Abdollah & Xiao, Rucheng, 2022. "Value of information analysis in non-stationary stochastic decision environments: A reliability-assisted POMDP approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    5. Kong, Dejing & Qin, Chengwei & He, Yong & Cui, Lirong, 2017. "Sensor-based calibrations to improve reliability of systems subject to multiple dependent competing failure processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 101-113.
    6. Zou, Guang & Faber, Michael Havbro & González, Arturo & Banisoleiman, Kian, 2021. "Computing the value of information from periodic testing in holistic decision making under uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    7. Hongda Gao & Dejing Kong & Yixin Sun, 2022. "Reliability modeling and analysis for systems governed by multiple competing failures processes," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 236(2), pages 256-265, April.
    8. Kapoor, Medha & Christensen, Christian Overgaard & Schmidt, Jacob Wittrup & Sørensen, John Dalsgaard & Thöns, Sebastian, 2023. "Decision analytic approach for the reclassification of concrete bridges by using elastic limit information from proof loading," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    9. Hai-Kun Wang & Yan-Feng Li & Yu Liu & Yuan-Jian Yang & Hong-Zhong Huang, 2015. "Remaining useful life estimation under degradation and shock damage," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 229(3), pages 200-208, June.
    10. Rafiee, Koosha & Feng, Qianmei & Coit, David W., 2017. "Reliability assessment of competing risks with generalized mixed shock models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 1-11.
    11. N. C. Caballé & I. T. Castro, 2019. "Assessment of the maintenance cost and analysis of availability measures in a finite life cycle for a system subject to competing failures," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 41(1), pages 255-290, March.
    12. Lin, Chaochao & Song, Junho & Pozzi, Matteo, 2022. "Optimal inspection of binary systems via Value of Information analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    13. Ji Hwan Cha & Maxim Finkelstein & Gregory Levitin, 2017. "Bivariate preventive maintenance for repairable systems subject to random shocks," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 231(6), pages 643-653, December.
    14. Shafiee, Mahmood & Finkelstein, Maxim & Bérenguer, Christophe, 2015. "An opportunistic condition-based maintenance policy for offshore wind turbine blades subjected to degradation and environmental shocks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 463-471.
    15. Mahmood Shafiee & Maxim Finkelstein, 2015. "A proactive group maintenance policy for continuously monitored deteriorating systems: Application to offshore wind turbines," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 229(5), pages 373-384, October.
    16. Fan, Mengfei & Zeng, Zhiguo & Zio, Enrico & Kang, Rui, 2017. "Modeling dependent competing failure processes with degradation-shock dependence," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 422-430.
    17. de Jonge, Bram, 2019. "Discretizing continuous-time continuous-state deterioration processes, with an application to condition-based maintenance optimization," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 1-5.
    18. Caballé, N.C. & Castro, I.T. & Pérez, C.J. & Lanza-Gutiérrez, J.M., 2015. "A condition-based maintenance of a dependent degradation-threshold-shock model in a system with multiple degradation processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 98-109.
    19. Cha, Ji Hwan & Finkelstein, Maxim & Levitin, Gregory, 2018. "Bivariate preventive maintenance of systems with lifetimes dependent on a random shock process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(1), pages 122-134.
    20. Shafiee, Mahmood & Finkelstein, Maxim, 2015. "An optimal age-based group maintenance policy for multi-unit degrading systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 230-238.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:226:y:2022:i:c:s0951832022003027. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.