IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v216y2021ics0951832021005251.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fast and accurate prediction of failure pressure of oil and gas defective pipelines using the deep learning model

Author

Listed:
  • Su, Yue
  • Li, Jingfa
  • Yu, Bo
  • Zhao, Yanlin
  • Yao, Jun

Abstract

Determining the failure pressure of defective pipelines is an important part in pipeline reliability engineering, which affects the assessment of pipelines residual service life. In this work, a fast and accurate method for predicting the failure pressure of defective pipelines using the deep learning model is developed. The calculation results of ASME-B31GM, DNV, PCORRC codes and finite element method (FEM) are compared and analyzed in detail to obtain high-quality sample data. 150 groups of validated FEM simulation data and 142 groups of burst pressure test data are selected for the training and validation of deep learning model. In the training process, influences of key model parameters of deep neural network (DNN) on the prediction accuracy are investigated. Prediction results indicate that the used deep learning model can offer high prediction accuracy. In addition, the calculation of deep learning model is accelerated by at least two orders of magnitude compared with that of FEM simulations under same calculation conditions. Finally, the influence of defect sizes on pipeline failure pressure is analyzed by the DNN. This work is expected to shed a light on efficient and accurate predictions of failure pressure of oil and gas defective pipelines.

Suggested Citation

  • Su, Yue & Li, Jingfa & Yu, Bo & Zhao, Yanlin & Yao, Jun, 2021. "Fast and accurate prediction of failure pressure of oil and gas defective pipelines using the deep learning model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:216:y:2021:i:c:s0951832021005251
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2021.108016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832021005251
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2021.108016?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aryai, Vahid & Baji, Hassan & Mahmoodian, Mojtaba & Li, Chun-Qing, 2020. "Time-dependent finite element reliability assessment of cast-iron water pipes subjected to spatio-temporal correlated corrosion process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    2. Liu, Aihua & Chen, Ke & Huang, Xiaofei & Li, Didi & Zhang, Xiaochun, 2021. "Dynamic risk assessment model of buried gas pipelines based on system dynamics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    3. Zhang, Hewei & Dong, Shaohua & Ling, Jiatong & Zhang, Laibin & Cheang, Brenda, 2020. "A modified method for the safety factor parameter: The use of big data to improve petroleum pipeline reliability assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    4. Li, C.Q. & Mahmoodian, M., 2013. "Risk based service life prediction of underground cast iron pipes subjected to corrosion," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 102-108.
    5. Lee, Chin-Hyung & Chang, Kyong-Ho, 2013. "Failure pressure of a pressurized girth-welded super duplex stainless steel pipe in reverse osmosis desalination plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 565-574.
    6. Yu, Weichao & Huang, Weihe & Wen, Kai & Zhang, Jie & Liu, Hongfei & Wang, Kun & Gong, Jing & Qu, Chunxu, 2021. "Subset simulation-based reliability analysis of the corroding natural gas pipeline," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    7. Mancuso, A. & Compare, M. & Salo, A. & Zio, E. & Laakso, T., 2016. "Risk-based optimization of pipe inspections in large underground networks with imprecise information," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 228-238.
    8. Chen, Qian & Zuo, Lili & Wu, Changchun & Bu, Yaran & Lu, Yifei & Huang, Yanfei & Chen, Feng, 2020. "Short-term supply reliability assessment of a gas pipeline system under demand variations," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Miao, Xingyuan & Zhao, Hong, 2023. "Novel method for residual strength prediction of defective pipelines based on HTLBO-DELM model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    2. Zhang, Qiongfang & Xu, Nan & Ersoy, Daniel & Liu, Yongming, 2022. "Manifold-based Conditional Bayesian network for aging pipe yield strength estimation with non-destructive measurements," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    3. Chen, Yinuo & Xie, Shuyi & Tian, Zhigang, 2022. "Risk assessment of buried gas pipelines based on improved cloud-variable weight theory," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    4. Zhang, Tieyao & Shuai, Jian & Shuai, Yi & Hua, Luoyi & Xu, Kui & Xie, Dong & Mei, Yuan, 2023. "Efficient prediction method of triple failure pressure for corroded pipelines under complex loads based on a backpropagation neural network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    5. Li, Pengyu & Wang, Xiufang & Jiang, Chunlei & Bi, Hongbo & Liu, Yongzhi & Yan, Wendi & Zhang, Cong & Dong, Taiji & Sun, Yu, 2024. "Advanced transformer model for simultaneous leakage aperture recognition and localization in gas pipelines," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    6. Wang, Chang & Zheng, Jianqin & Liang, Yongtu & Wang, Bohong & Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír & Zhu, Zhu & Liao, Qi, 2022. "Deeppipe: An intelligent monitoring framework for operating condition of multi-product pipelines," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    7. Lingyun, Guo & Markus, Niffenegger & Jing, Zhou, 2022. "A novel procedure to evaluate the performance of failure assessment models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    8. Zhou, Jie & Lin, Haifei & Li, Shugang & Jin, Hongwei & Zhao, Bo & Liu, Shihao, 2023. "Leakage diagnosis and localization of the gas extraction pipeline based on SA-PSO BP neural network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    9. Yue Su & Jingfa Li & Wangyi Guo & Yanlin Zhao & Jianli Li & Jie Zhao & Yusheng Wang, 2022. "Prediction of Mixing Uniformity of Hydrogen Injection inNatural Gas Pipeline Based on a Deep Learning Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-19, November.
    10. Chen, Zhanfeng & Li, Xuyao & Wang, Wen & Li, Yan & Shi, Lei & Li, Yuxing, 2023. "Residual strength prediction of corroded pipelines using multilayer perceptron and modified feedforward neural network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    11. Yin, Yuanbo & Yang, Hao & Duan, Pengfei & Li, Luling & Zio, Enrico & Liu, Cuiwei & Li, Yuxing, 2022. "Improved quantitative risk assessment of a natural gas pipeline considering high-consequence areas," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    12. Zheng, Jianqin & Wang, Chang & Liang, Yongtu & Liao, Qi & Li, Zhuochao & Wang, Bohong, 2022. "Deeppipe: A deep-learning method for anomaly detection of multi-product pipelines," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yin, Yuanbo & Yang, Hao & Duan, Pengfei & Li, Luling & Zio, Enrico & Liu, Cuiwei & Li, Yuxing, 2022. "Improved quantitative risk assessment of a natural gas pipeline considering high-consequence areas," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    2. Amaya-Gómez, Rafael & Schoefs, Franck & Sánchez-Silva, Mauricio & Muñoz, Felipe & Bastidas-Arteaga, Emilio, 2022. "Matching of corroded defects in onshore pipelines based on In-Line Inspections and Voronoi partitions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    3. Xiao, Rui & Zayed, Tarek & Meguid, Mohamed A. & Sushama, Laxmi, 2024. "Improving failure modeling for gas transmission pipelines: A survival analysis and machine learning integrated approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    4. Yang, Yang & Li, Suzhen & Zhang, Pengcheng, 2022. "Data-driven accident consequence assessment on urban gas pipeline network based on machine learning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    5. Liu, Aihua & Chen, Ke & Huang, Xiaofei & Li, Didi & Zhang, Xiaochun, 2021. "Dynamic risk assessment model of buried gas pipelines based on system dynamics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    6. Su, H. & Wu, C.S. & Pittner, A. & Rethmeier, M., 2014. "Thermal energy generation and distribution in friction stir welding of aluminum alloys," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 720-731.
    7. Fan, Xudong & Wang, Xiaowei & Zhang, Xijin & ASCE Xiong (Bill) Yu, P.E.F., 2022. "Machine learning based water pipe failure prediction: The effects of engineering, geology, climate and socio-economic factors," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    8. Lin Wang & Yuping Xing, 2022. "Risk Assessment of a Coupled Natural Gas and Electricity Market Considering Dual Interactions: A System Dynamics Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-18, December.
    9. Hendalianpour, Ayad & Liu, Peide & Amirghodsi, Sirous & Hamzehlou, Mohammad, 2022. "Designing a System Dynamics model to simulate criteria affecting oil and gas development contracts," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    10. Peng Hou & Xiaojian Yi & Haiping Dong, 2020. "A Spatial Statistic Based Risk Assessment Approach to Prioritize the Pipeline Inspection of the Pipeline Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-16, February.
    11. Ruiz-Tagle, Andres & Lewis, Austin D. & Schell, Colin A. & Lever, Ernest & Groth, Katrina M., 2022. "BaNTERA: A Bayesian Network for Third-Party Excavation Risk Assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    12. Wang, WuChang & Zhang, Yi & Li, YuXing & Hu, Qihui & Liu, Chengsong & Liu, Cuiwei, 2022. "Vulnerability analysis method based on risk assessment for gas transmission capabilities of natural gas pipeline networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PB).
    13. Guo, Jian & Luo, Cheng & Ma, Kaijiang, 2023. "Risk coupling analysis of road transportation accidents of hazardous materials in complicated maritime environment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    14. Meng, Huixing & Liu, Xuan & Xing, Jinduo & Zio, Enrico, 2022. "A method for economic evaluation of predictive maintenance technologies by integrating system dynamics and evolutionary game modelling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    15. Braga, Joaquim A.P. & Andrade, António R., 2021. "Multivariate statistical aggregation and dimensionality reduction techniques to improve monitoring and maintenance in railways: The wheelset component," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    16. Liu, Shengli & Liang, Yongtu, 2021. "Statistics of catastrophic hazardous liquid pipeline accidents," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    17. Chen, Thomas Ying-Jeh & Guikema, Seth David & Daly, Craig Michael, 2019. "Optimal pipe inspection paths considering inspection tool limitations," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 156-166.
    18. Ngandu Balekelayi & Solomon Tesfamariam, 2020. "Geoadditive Quantile Regression Model for Sewer Pipes Deterioration Using Boosting Optimization Algorithm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-24, October.
    19. Mathpati, Yogesh Chandrakant & More, Kalpesh Sanjay & Tripura, Tapas & Nayek, Rajdip & Chakraborty, Souvik, 2023. "MAntRA: A framework for model agnostic reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    20. Lin, Zhixian & Tao, Longlong & Wang, Shaoxuan & Yong, Nuo & Xia, Dongqin & Wang, Jianye & Ge, Daochuan, 2024. "A subset simulation analysis framework for rapid reliability evaluation of series-parallel cold standby systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:216:y:2021:i:c:s0951832021005251. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.