IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v172y2018icp207-215.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nonlinear step-stress accelerated degradation modelling considering three sources of variability

Author

Listed:
  • Hao, Songhua
  • Yang, Jun
  • Berenguer, Christophe

Abstract

In the absence of enough run-to-failure data, step-stress accelerated degradation testing (SSADT) is often an attractive alternative way to evaluate the reliability of a product, with the advantage of requiring small sample size and short test time. However, the development of a statistical SSADT model for reliability assessment should take into account different sources of variability in the degradation process that generate uncertainty: 1) temporal variability determining the inherent variability of degradation process over time; 2) unit-to-unit variability in three aspects: degradation rates, initial degradation values, time-points of elevating stress levels; and 3) measurement errors in both covariates and degradation performance. As a contribution towards this aim, a new nonlinear Wiener-process-based SSADT model considering simultaneously nonlinearity and three sources of variability is proposed. Using the proposed SSADT model, the lifetime law of the tested product under normal conditions is derived based on the concept of first hitting time (FHT) of a predetermined failure threshold. Following an approach based on genetic algorithms (GA), a modified simulation and extrapolation method, called GA-SIMEX, is also developed for the model parameter estimation. Finally, a simulation study of fatigue crack length growth is presented to illustrate the implementation of the proposed SSADT model.

Suggested Citation

  • Hao, Songhua & Yang, Jun & Berenguer, Christophe, 2018. "Nonlinear step-stress accelerated degradation modelling considering three sources of variability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 207-215.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:172:y:2018:i:c:p:207-215
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2017.12.012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095183201730621X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2017.12.012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Baraldi, Piero & Mangili, Francesca & Zio, Enrico, 2013. "Investigation of uncertainty treatment capability of model-based and data-driven prognostic methods using simulated data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 94-108.
    2. Zhai, Qingqing & Ye, Zhi-Sheng & Yang, Jun & Zhao, Yu, 2016. "Measurement errors in degradation-based burn-in," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 126-135.
    3. Wang, Huan & Wang, Guan-jun & Duan, Feng-jun, 2016. "Planning of step-stress accelerated degradation test based on the inverse Gaussian process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 97-105.
    4. Dongliang Lu & Mahesh D Pandey & Wei-Chau Xie, 2013. "An efficient method for the estimation of parameters of stochastic gamma process from noisy degradation measurements," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 227(4), pages 425-433, August.
    5. Huang, Jianlin & Golubović, Dušan S & Koh, Sau & Yang, Daoguo & Li, Xiupeng & Fan, Xuejun & Zhang, G.Q., 2016. "Lumen degradation modeling of white-light LEDs in step stress accelerated degradation test," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 152-159.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Khakifirooz, Marzieh & Fathi, Michel & Lee, I-Chen & Tseng, Sheng-Tsaing, 2023. "Neural ordinary differential equation for sequential optimal design of fatigue test under accelerated life test analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    2. Xu, Danyang & Qiu, Haobo & Gao, Liang & Yang, Zan & Wang, Dapeng, 2022. "A novel dual-stream self-attention neural network for remaining useful life estimation of mechanical systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    3. Liu, Zhe & Li, Xiaoyang & Kang, Rui, 2022. "Uncertain differential equation based accelerated degradation modeling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    4. Yan, Weian & Xu, Xiaofan & Bigaud, David & Cao, Wenqin, 2023. "Optimal design of step-stress accelerated degradation tests based on the Tweedie exponential dispersion process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    5. Zheng, Bokai & Chen, Cen & Lin, Yigang & Hu, Yifan & Ye, Xuerong & Zhai, Guofu & Zio, Enrico, 2022. "Optimal design of step-stress accelerated degradation test oriented by nonlinear and distributed degradation process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    6. Ye, Xuerong & Hu, Yifan & Zheng, Bokai & Chen, Cen & Zhai, Guofu, 2022. "A new class of multi-stress acceleration models with interaction effects and its extension to accelerated degradation modelling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    7. Pang, Zhenan & Si, Xiaosheng & Hu, Changhua & Du, Dangbo & Pei, Hong, 2021. "A Bayesian Inference for Remaining Useful Life Estimation by Fusing Accelerated Degradation Data and Condition Monitoring Data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    8. Wu, Ji-Peng & Kang, Rui & Li, Xiao-Yang, 2020. "Uncertain accelerated degradation modeling and analysis considering epistemic uncertainties in time and unit dimension," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    9. Li, Naipeng & Gebraeel, Nagi & Lei, Yaguo & Fang, Xiaolei & Cai, Xiao & Yan, Tao, 2021. "Remaining useful life prediction based on a multi-sensor data fusion model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Zhengxin & Si, Xiaosheng & Hu, Changhua & Lei, Yaguo, 2018. "Degradation data analysis and remaining useful life estimation: A review on Wiener-process-based methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(3), pages 775-796.
    2. Li, Junxing & Wang, Zhihua & Zhang, Yongbo & Liu, Chengrui & Fu, Huimin, 2018. "A nonlinear Wiener process degradation model with autoregressive errors," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 48-57.
    3. Hu, Yang & Baraldi, Piero & Di Maio, Francesco & Zio, Enrico, 2015. "A particle filtering and kernel smoothing-based approach for new design component prognostics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 19-31.
    4. Nguyen, Khanh T.P. & Medjaher, Kamal & Gogu, Christian, 2022. "Probabilistic deep learning methodology for uncertainty quantification of remaining useful lifetime of multi-component systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    5. Zhengxin Zhang & Xiaosheng Si & Changhua Hu & Xiangyu Kong, 2015. "Degradation modeling–based remaining useful life estimation: A review on approaches for systems with heterogeneity," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 229(4), pages 343-355, August.
    6. Zheng, Xiujuan & Fang, Huajing, 2015. "An integrated unscented kalman filter and relevance vector regression approach for lithium-ion battery remaining useful life and short-term capacity prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 74-82.
    7. Zhai, Qingqing & Chen, Piao & Hong, Lanqing & Shen, Lijuan, 2018. "A random-effects Wiener degradation model based on accelerated failure time," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 94-103.
    8. Wang, Xiaofei & Wang, Bing Xing & Jiang, Pei Hua & Hong, Yili, 2020. "Accurate reliability inference based on Wiener process with random effects for degradation data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    9. Hao, Songhua & Yang, Jun & Berenguer, Christophe, 2019. "Degradation analysis based on an extended inverse Gaussian process model with skew-normal random effects and measurement errors," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 261-270.
    10. Hai-Kun Wang & Yan-Feng Li & Yu Liu & Yuan-Jian Yang & Hong-Zhong Huang, 2015. "Remaining useful life estimation under degradation and shock damage," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 229(3), pages 200-208, June.
    11. Hao, Zhaojun & Di Maio, Francesco & Zio, Enrico, 2023. "A sequential decision problem formulation and deep reinforcement learning solution of the optimization of O&M of cyber-physical energy systems (CPESs) for reliable and safe power production and supply," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    12. Yan, Bingxin & Ma, Xiaobing & Yang, Li & Wang, Han & Wu, Tianyi, 2020. "A novel degradation-rate-volatility related effect Wiener process model with its extension to accelerated ageing data analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    13. Pinciroli, Luca & Baraldi, Piero & Ballabio, Guido & Compare, Michele & Zio, Enrico, 2022. "Optimization of the Operation and Maintenance of renewable energy systems by Deep Reinforcement Learning," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 752-763.
    14. Cheng, Yao & Liao, Haitao & Huang, Zhiyi, 2021. "Optimal degradation-based hybrid double-stage acceptance sampling plan for a heterogeneous product," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    15. Chiachío, Juan & Chiachío, Manuel & Sankararaman, Shankar & Saxena, Abhinav & Goebel, Kai, 2015. "Condition-based prediction of time-dependent reliability in composites," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 134-147.
    16. Li, Naipeng & Gebraeel, Nagi & Lei, Yaguo & Bian, Linkan & Si, Xiaosheng, 2019. "Remaining useful life prediction of machinery under time-varying operating conditions based on a two-factor state-space model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 88-100.
    17. Wang, Hai-Kun & Li, Yan-Feng & Huang, Hong-Zhong & Jin, Tongdan, 2017. "Near-extreme system condition and near-extreme remaining useful time for a group of products," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 103-110.
    18. Ma, Zhonghai & Liao, Haitao & Ji, Hui & Wang, Shaoping & Yin, Fanglong & Nie, Songlin, 2021. "Optimal design of hybrid accelerated test based on the Inverse Gaussian process model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    19. Chiachío, Manuel & Chiachío, Juan & Sankararaman, Shankar & Goebel, Kai & Andrews, John, 2017. "A new algorithm for prognostics using Subset Simulation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 189-199.
    20. Lu, Yaohui & Zheng, Heyan & Zeng, Jing & Chen, Tianli & Wu, Pingbo, 2019. "Fatigue life reliability evaluation in a high-speed train bogie frame using accelerated life and numerical test," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 221-232.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:172:y:2018:i:c:p:207-215. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.