IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v107y2012icp16-22.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Uncertainty and sensitive analysis of environmental model for risk assessments: An industrial case study

Author

Listed:
  • Carlos García-Díaz, J.
  • Gozalvez-Zafrilla, J.M.

Abstract

The objectives of this paper are the application of uncertainty and sensitivity analysis methods in atmospheric dispersion modeling to study the prediction of the dispersion of pollutants in the atmosphere. The Gaussian Plume Model is used to study the impact of meteorology on the dispersion of the emissions from an industrial source complex. The determination of ground-level concentration and maximum ground-level concentration is useful for the prediction of violations of air quality regulations. The Industrial Source Complex Short-Term (ISCST-3) air pollution model was adopted to predict the ground-level concentration of sulfur dioxide (SO2) emitted by a power plant located in an industrial region site in Spain. Quantitative uncertainty analysis has become a common component of risk assessments. Uncertainties were defined a priori for each of the following variables: wind speed, wind direction, and pollutant emission rate. In order to obtain information about the uncertainty of computer code results, a number of code runs was performed using the nonparametric tolerance limits method. The Monte Carlo method was used to propagate uncertainty across codes. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient was used as a sensitivity measure.

Suggested Citation

  • Carlos García-Díaz, J. & Gozalvez-Zafrilla, J.M., 2012. "Uncertainty and sensitive analysis of environmental model for risk assessments: An industrial case study," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 16-22.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:107:y:2012:i:c:p:16-22
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2011.04.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832011000986
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2011.04.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martorell, S. & Sanchez, A. & Carlos, S., 2007. "A tolerance interval based approach to address uncertainty for RAMS+C optimization," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(4), pages 408-422.
    2. Carta, J.A. & Ramírez, P. & Velázquez, S., 2009. "A review of wind speed probability distributions used in wind energy analysis: Case studies in the Canary Islands," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(5), pages 933-955, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. XiaoFei, Lu & Min, Liu, 2014. "Hazard rate function in dynamic environment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 50-60.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fazelpour, Farivar & Markarian, Elin & Soltani, Nima, 2017. "Wind energy potential and economic assessment of four locations in Sistan and Balouchestan province in Iran," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 646-667.
    2. Amirinia, Gholamreza & Mafi, Somayeh & Mazaheri, Said, 2017. "Offshore wind resource assessment of Persian Gulf using uncertainty analysis and GIS," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 915-929.
    3. Tang, Jie & Brouste, Alexandre & Tsui, Kwok Leung, 2015. "Some improvements of wind speed Markov chain modeling," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 52-56.
    4. Sajid Ali & Sang-Moon Lee & Choon-Man Jang, 2017. "Techno-Economic Assessment of Wind Energy Potential at Three Locations in South Korea Using Long-Term Measured Wind Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-24, September.
    5. Aruna Kanagaraj & Kumudini Devi Raguru Pandu, 2020. "Investigations of Various Market Models in a Deregulated Power Environment Using ACOPF," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, May.
    6. Botelho, D.F. & de Oliveira, L.W. & Dias, B.H. & Soares, T.A. & Moraes, C.A., 2022. "Integrated prosumers–DSO approach applied in peer-to-peer energy and reserve tradings considering network constraints," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).
    7. Han, Qinkai & Wang, Tianyang & Chu, Fulei, 2022. "Nonparametric copula modeling of wind speed-wind shear for the assessment of height-dependent wind energy in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    8. Rodriguez-Hernandez, O. & Jaramillo, O.A. & Andaverde, J.A. & del Río, J.A., 2013. "Analysis about sampling, uncertainties and selection of a reliable probabilistic model of wind speed data used on resource assessment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 244-252.
    9. Mostafaeipour, Ali, 2010. "Productivity and development issues of global wind turbine industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 1048-1058, April.
    10. Olgun Aydin & Bartłomiej Igliński & Krzysztof Krukowski & Marek Siemiński, 2022. "Analyzing Wind Energy Potential Using Efficient Global Optimization: A Case Study for the City Gdańsk in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-22, April.
    11. Wang, Jianzhou & Huang, Xiaojia & Li, Qiwei & Ma, Xuejiao, 2018. "Comparison of seven methods for determining the optimal statistical distribution parameters: A case study of wind energy assessment in the large-scale wind farms of China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 432-448.
    12. Muhammad Fitra Zambak & Catra Indra Cahyadi & Jufri Helmi & Tengku Machdhalie Sofie & Suwarno Suwarno, 2023. "Evaluation and Analysis of Wind Speed with the Weibull and Rayleigh Distribution Models for Energy Potential Using Three Models," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(2), pages 427-432, March.
    13. Höltinger, Stefan & Salak, Boris & Schauppenlehner, Thomas & Scherhaufer, Patrick & Schmidt, Johannes, 2016. "Austria's wind energy potential – A participatory modeling approach to assess socio-political and market acceptance," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 49-61.
    14. Shen, Xin & Chen, Jin-Ge & Zhu, Xiao-Cheng & Liu, Peng-Yin & Du, Zhao-Hui, 2015. "Multi-objective optimization of wind turbine blades using lifting surface method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P1), pages 1111-1121.
    15. Wang, Tian & Deng, Shiming, 2019. "Multi-Period energy procurement policies for smart-grid communities with deferrable demand and supplementary uncertain power supplies," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 212-226.
    16. Martorell, S. & Villamizar, M. & Martón, I. & Villanueva, J.F. & Carlos, S. & Sánchez, A.I., 2014. "Evaluation of risk impact of changes to surveillance requirements addressing model and parameter uncertainties," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 153-165.
    17. Li, Gong & Shi, Jing, 2012. "Applications of Bayesian methods in wind energy conversion systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 1-8.
    18. Chadee, Xsitaaz T. & Clarke, Ricardo M., 2018. "Wind resources and the levelized cost of wind generated electricity in the Caribbean islands of Trinidad and Tobago," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2526-2540.
    19. Katinas, Vladislovas & Gecevicius, Giedrius & Marciukaitis, Mantas, 2018. "An investigation of wind power density distribution at location with low and high wind speeds using statistical model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 442-451.
    20. Han, Qinkai & Chu, Fulei, 2021. "Directional wind energy assessment of China based on nonparametric copula models," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1334-1349.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:107:y:2012:i:c:p:16-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.