IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/recore/v113y2016icp1-11.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An initial life cycle assessment of rare earth oxides production from ion-adsorption clays

Author

Listed:
  • Vahidi, Ehsan
  • Navarro, Julio
  • Zhao, Fu

Abstract

Rare earth elements (REEs) have found applications in the aerospace, automotive, consumer electronics and lighting industries, among others. A special class of REEs known as heavy rare earths (HREEs) is of particular importance to energy applications. With the growing clean energy technologies incorporating HREEs, it is valuable to examine their environmental emissions and energy requirements. Currently, extraction of HREEs is mainly carried out in China, where they are extracted mainly via open pit mining of bastnasite and/or monazite and leaching of ion-adsorption clays. Leach mining varies significantly from open pit mining technique in that the ores have much lower REE content but REEs stay as cations thus there is no need for physical and chemical beneficiation. To date limited life cycle assessment (LCA) studies have been done on REEs production and all of them are for the bastnasite/monazite route. This paper presents the first LCA of in-situ leach mining of REEs from ion adsorption clays in southern China. The function unit was defined as production of 1kg of mixed rare earth oxides (REOs) of purity 92%. Ecoinvent 3.0 database was adopted for inventory analysis with material and energy flow information gathered from Chinese literature. To facilitate the use of results in U.S. and EU, TRACI and ILCD in SimaPro 8 were used for environmental impact assessment and cumulative energy demand was also considered as one additional category. The results showed that the environmental impacts for REOs derived from ion adsorption clays are similar in categories such as global warming and cumulative energy demand, but differs significantly in categories of eutrophication and acidification. Since the content of high value HREEs is much higher in ion adsorption clays, when economic value based allocation is used individual REO from in situ leaching has lower environmental impacts across all categories considered. With estimates of HREEs derived from ion-adsorption clays accounting for approximately 35% of the Chinese output, this LCA is a step towards getting a full understanding of the true environmental impact of technologies incorporating HREEs.

Suggested Citation

  • Vahidi, Ehsan & Navarro, Julio & Zhao, Fu, 2016. "An initial life cycle assessment of rare earth oxides production from ion-adsorption clays," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-11.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:113:y:2016:i:c:p:1-11
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.05.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344916301161
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.05.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chancerel, Perrine & Marwede, Max & Nissen, Nils F. & Lang, Klaus-Dieter, 2015. "Estimating the quantities of critical metals embedded in ICT and consumer equipment," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 9-18.
    2. Machacek, Erika & Richter, Jessika Luth & Habib, Komal & Klossek, Polina, 2015. "Recycling of rare earths from fluorescent lamps: Value analysis of closing-the-loop under demand and supply uncertainties," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 104(PA), pages 76-93.
    3. Greenfield, Aaron & Graedel, T.E., 2013. "The omnivorous diet of modern technology," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 1-7.
    4. Ferella, Francesco & Innocenzi, Valentina & Maggiore, Fabio, 2016. "Oil refining spent catalysts: A review of possible recycling technologies," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 10-20.
    5. Golev, Artem & Scott, Margaretha & Erskine, Peter D. & Ali, Saleem H. & Ballantyne, Grant R., 2014. "Rare earths supply chains: Current status, constraints and opportunities," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 52-59.
    6. Wu, Yufeng & Yin, Xiaofei & Zhang, Qijun & Wang, Wei & Mu, Xianzhong, 2014. "The recycling of rare earths from waste tricolor phosphors in fluorescent lamps: A review of processes and technologies," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 21-31.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Erika Machacek & Jessika Luth Richter & Ruth Lane, 2017. "Governance and Risk–Value Constructions in Closing Loops of Rare Earth Elements in Global Value Chains," Resources, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-25, October.
    2. Zuo, Zhili & Cheng, Jinhua & Guo, Haixiang & Li, Yonglin, 2021. "Knowledge mapping of research on strategic mineral resource security: A visual analysis using CiteSpace," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    3. Andrea Schreiber & Josefine Marx & Petra Zapp & Jürgen-Friedrich Hake & Daniel Voßenkaul & Bernd Friedrich, 2016. "Environmental Impacts of Rare Earth Mining and Separation Based on Eudialyte: A New European Way," Resources, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-22, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schulze, Rita & Buchert, Matthias, 2016. "Estimates of global REE recycling potentials from NdFeB magnet material," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 12-27.
    2. Mizanur Rahman, S.M. & Kim, Junbeum & Lerondel, Gilles & Bouzidi, Youcef & Nomenyo, Komla & Clerget, Laure, 2017. "Missing research focus in end-of-life management of light-emitting diode (LED) lamps," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 256-258.
    3. Machacek, Erika & Richter, Jessika Luth & Habib, Komal & Klossek, Polina, 2015. "Recycling of rare earths from fluorescent lamps: Value analysis of closing-the-loop under demand and supply uncertainties," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 104(PA), pages 76-93.
    4. Erika Machacek & Jessika Luth Richter & Ruth Lane, 2017. "Governance and Risk–Value Constructions in Closing Loops of Rare Earth Elements in Global Value Chains," Resources, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-25, October.
    5. Cherepovitsyn, Alexey & Solovyova, Victoria & Dmitrieva, Diana, 2023. "New challenges for the sustainable development of the rare-earth metals sector in Russia: Transforming industrial policies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    6. Machacek, Erika & Fold, Niels, 2014. "Alternative value chains for rare earths: The Anglo-deposit developers," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 53-64.
    7. Hache, Emmanuel & Seck, Gondia Sokhna & Simoen, Marine & Bonnet, Clément & Carcanague, Samuel, 2019. "Critical raw materials and transportation sector electrification: A detailed bottom-up analysis in world transport," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 6-25.
    8. Ge, Jianping & Lei, Yalin, 2018. "Resource tax on rare earths in China: Policy evolution and market responses," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 291-297.
    9. Packey, Daniel J. & Kingsnorth, Dudley, 2016. "The impact of unregulated ionic clay rare earth mining in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 112-116.
    10. Tian, Xi & Wu, Yufeng & Qu, Shen & Liang, Sai & Xu, Ming & Zuo, Tieyong, 2016. "The disposal and willingness to pay for residents scrap fluorescent lamps in China: A case study of Beijing," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 103-111.
    11. Chen, Yufeng & Zheng, Biao & Qu, Fang, 2020. "Modeling the nexus of crude oil, new energy and rare earth in China: An asymmetric VAR-BEKK (DCC)-GARCH approach," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    12. Amanda Qinisile Vilakazi & Sehliselo Ndlovu & Liberty Chipise & Alan Shemi, 2022. "The Recycling of Coal Fly Ash: A Review on Sustainable Developments and Economic Considerations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-32, February.
    13. Schlinkert, Dominik & van den Boogaart, Karl Gerald, 2015. "The development of the market for rare earth elements: Insights from economic theory," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(P2), pages 272-280.
    14. Xia, Qifan & Du, Debin & Cao, Wanpeng & Li, Xiya, 2023. "Who is the core? Reveal the heterogeneity of global rare earth trade structure from the perspective of industrial chain," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    15. Stefania Lucantonio & Andrea Di Giuliano & Leucio Rossi & Katia Gallucci, 2023. "Green Diesel Production via Deoxygenation Process: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-44, January.
    16. Dongmin Son & Songi Kim & Hyungbin Park & Bongju Jeong, 2018. "Closed-Loop Supply Chain Planning Model of Rare Metals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-20, April.
    17. Li, Chen & Mogollón, José M. & Tukker, Arnold & Dong, Jianning & von Terzi, Dominic & Zhang, Chunbo & Steubing, Bernhard, 2022. "Future material requirements for global sustainable offshore wind energy development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    18. Hau, Liya & Zhu, Huiming & Yu, Yang & Yu, Dongwei, 2022. "Time-frequency coherence and quantile causality between trade policy uncertainty and rare earth prices: Evidence from China and the US," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    19. Isabella Tamine Parra Miranda & Juliana Moletta & Bruno Pedroso & Luiz Alberto Pilatti & Claudia Tania Picinin, 2021. "A Review on Green Technology Practices at BRICS Countries: Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, May.
    20. Yufeng Chen & Biao Zheng, 2019. "What Happens after the Rare Earth Crisis: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-26, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:113:y:2016:i:c:p:1-11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kai Meng (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/resources-conservation-and-recycling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.