IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reacre/v28y2016i1p1-10.html

Harmonizing pension accounting: Income statement effects of applying IAS19R to U.S. firms

Author

Listed:
  • Bauman, Mark P.
  • Shaw, Kenneth W.

Abstract

With IAS19R, Employee Benefits, the IASB simplified the accounting for defined-benefit pension plans by eliminating the use of an expected pension asset return assumption and by eliminating several of the income smoothing techniques included in the previous standard. To provide prospective evidence useful to the FASB's ongoing attempts to simplify and improve accounting standards, this study applies the revised pension accounting rules under IAS19R to a sample of U.S. firms with defined-benefit pension plans. Overall, there is no significant change in total pension expense from applying IAS19R versus current U.S. GAAP for a sample of S&P 500 firms over 2010–2012. This is due to the effects of eliminating the expected pension asset return and the “corridor” approach to smoothing unrealized gains or losses essentially offsetting each other. However, it is shown that IAS19R would significantly increase pension expense for subsamples of firms with high expected pension asset return assumptions, firms with low levels of amortized net pension losses or gains, and firms with better-funded pension plans.

Suggested Citation

  • Bauman, Mark P. & Shaw, Kenneth W., 2016. "Harmonizing pension accounting: Income statement effects of applying IAS19R to U.S. firms," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 1-10.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reacre:v:28:y:2016:i:1:p:1-10
    DOI: 10.1016/j.racreg.2016.03.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1052045716000023
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.racreg.2016.03.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel Bergstresser & Mihir Desai & Joshua Rauh, 2006. "Earnings Manipulation, Pension Assumptions, and Managerial Investment Decisions," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 121(1), pages 157-195.
    2. Francis, Rick N. & Glandon, Sid & Olsen, Lori, 2013. "The persistence of current and proposed measures of operating cash flow," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 157-168.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Foltin, Craig, 2018. "An examination of state and local government pension underfunding – Implications and guidance for governance and regulation," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 112-120.
    2. Mintchik, Natalia & Moehrle, Stephen & Reynolds-Moehrle, Jennifer, 2024. "Evolution, trends, and recent developments in international accounting studies: A synthesis of evidence published in “Research in Accounting Regulation”," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    3. Comprix, Joseph & Guo, Jun & Zhang, Yan & Zhou, Nan, 2017. "Setting expected rates of return on pension plan assets: New evidence on the influence of audit committee accounting experts," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 159-166.
    4. Bauman, Mark P. & Shaw, Kenneth W., 2016. "Balance sheet classification and the valuation of deferred taxes," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 77-85.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Denise A. Jones, 2013. "Changes in the Funded Status of Retirement Plans after the Adoption of SFAS No. 158: Economic Improvement or Balance Sheet Management," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3), pages 1099-1132, September.
    2. Alexander Dyck & Paulo Manoel & Adair Morse, 2022. "Outraged by Compensation: Implications for Public Pension Performance," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 35(6), pages 2928-2980.
    3. Hsieh, Su-Jane & Liu, Shuming, 2021. "The cost-of-equity implications of off-balance sheet pension liabilities," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1).
    4. Tao, Qizhi & Chen, Carl & Lu, Rui & Zhang, Ting, 2017. "Underfunding or distress? An analysis of corporate pension underfunding and the cross-section of expected stock returns," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 116-133.
    5. Iqbal Owadally, 2014. "Tail risk in pension funds: an analysis using ARCH models and bilinear processes," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 43(2), pages 301-331, August.
    6. Justin Chircop & Paraskevi Vicky Kiosse, 2024. "Does the Publication or the Implementation of IAS 19(R) Have Real Economic Consequences?," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 60(4), pages 777-815, December.
    7. Garman, Amy D. & Kubick, Thomas R., 2025. "Mitigating risk-shifting in corporate pension plans: Evidence from stakeholder constituency statutes," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(1).
    8. repec:pra:mprapa:116209 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Bergstresser, Daniel & Philippon, Thomas, 2006. "CEO incentives and earnings management," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(3), pages 511-529, June.
    10. Lianzan Xu & Francis Cai & Ge Zhang, 2022. "Hybrid Earnings Management in the Pre- and Post-SOX," International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, vol. 12(1), pages 22-36.
    11. Robert Novy-Marx & Joshua D. Rauh, 2008. "The Intergenerational Transfer of Public Pension Promises," NBER Working Papers 14343, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Igor Goncharov & Vasso Ioannidou & Martin C. Schmalz, 2017. "(Why) Do Central Banks Care About Their Profits?," CESifo Working Paper Series 6546, CESifo.
    13. Qin, Yiyi & Cai, Jun & Rhee, S. Ghon, 2021. "Do Japanese firms systematically inflate expected rate of returns from defined benefit pension plans?," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    14. José M. Marín & Francesco Franzoni, 2005. "Portable alphas from pension mispricing," Economics Working Papers 894, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    15. Doyle, Joanne M., 2017. "Persistence in the long-run expected rate of return for corporate pension plans," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 271-277.
    16. Brian Silverstein, 2021. "Defined benefit pension de‐risking and corporate risk‐taking," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 50(4), pages 1085-1111, December.
    17. Comprix, Joseph & Muller III, Karl A., 2011. "Pension plan accounting estimates and the freezing of defined benefit pension plans," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(1-2), pages 115-133, February.
    18. Aleksandra “Ally” B. Zimmerman & Dereck Barr‐Pulliam & Joon‐Suk Lee & Miguel Minutti‐Meza, 2023. "Auditors’ Use of In‐House Specialists," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 61(4), pages 1363-1418, September.
    19. Franzoni, Francesco, 2009. "Underinvestment vs. overinvestment: Evidence from price reactions to pension contributions," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(3), pages 491-518, June.
    20. William H. Janeway & Ramana Nanda & Matthew Rhodes-Kropf, 2021. "Venture Capital Booms and Start-Up Financing," Annual Review of Financial Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 13(1), pages 111-127, November.
    21. Joachim Inkmann & David Blake & Zhen Shi, 2017. "Managing Financially Distressed Pension Plans In The Interest Of Beneficiaries," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 84(2), pages 539-565, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reacre:v:28:y:2016:i:1:p:1-10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/research-in-accounting-regulation .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.