IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/phsmap/v633y2024ics0378437123009743.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk-informed longitudinal control in autonomous vehicles: A safety potential field modeling approach

Author

Listed:
  • Shao, Yichang
  • Han, Zhongyi
  • Shi, Xiaomeng
  • Zhang, Yuhan
  • Ye, Zhirui

Abstract

The advent of autonomous vehicles (AVs) has complicated traffic flow and raised safety concerns, there is a pressing need to enhance traffic efficiency alongside ensuring robust safety. This paper proposes a dynamic longitudinal control strategy for AVs, based on real-time accident risk assessments. Data from traffic flow, road characteristics, and weather conditions are analyzed using a random forest algorithm, producing a real-time accident risk identification model through a support vector machine. In addition, the Perceived Risk Field Model (PRFM), a car-following model calibrated using the NGSIM dataset, considers vehicle distance, velocity, relative velocity, and acceleration. These models underpin our proposed longitudinal control strategies, tailored to variable accident risk levels. Under the normal risk control strategy, the PRFM outperforms the Intelligent Driver Model (IDM) and the Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control Model (CACC) in stability and driving comfort. For high accident risk scenarios, our approach shows improved collision avoidance and traffic oscillation mitigation. Simulations indicate that the high accident risk control strategy offers better safety and stability than the normal risk strategy. Furthermore, traffic flow diagrams suggest an increase in road capacity as AV penetration rates rise, pointing to the promising efficiency of our proposed solution. This research provides a robust framework for AV operation, ensuring optimal traffic safety and efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Shao, Yichang & Han, Zhongyi & Shi, Xiaomeng & Zhang, Yuhan & Ye, Zhirui, 2024. "Risk-informed longitudinal control in autonomous vehicles: A safety potential field modeling approach," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 633(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:633:y:2024:i:c:s0378437123009743
    DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2023.129419
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378437123009743
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only. Journal offers the option of making the article available online on Science direct for a fee of $3,000
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.physa.2023.129419?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gipps, P.G., 1981. "A behavioural car-following model for computer simulation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 105-111, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Xiaopeng & Wang, Xin & Ouyang, Yanfeng, 2012. "Prediction and field validation of traffic oscillation propagation under nonlinear car-following laws," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 409-423.
    2. Osorio, Carolina & Punzo, Vincenzo, 2019. "Efficient calibration of microscopic car-following models for large-scale stochastic network simulators," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 156-173.
    3. Rehborn, Hubert & Klenov, Sergey L. & Palmer, Jochen, 2011. "An empirical study of common traffic congestion features based on traffic data measured in the USA, the UK, and Germany," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 390(23), pages 4466-4485.
    4. Yaqi Liu & Xiaoyuan Wang, 2020. "Differences in Driving Intention Transitions Caused by Driver’s Emotion Evolutions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-22, September.
    5. He, Zhengbing & Zheng, Liang & Guan, Wei, 2015. "A simple nonparametric car-following model driven by field data," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 185-201.
    6. Ziakopoulos, Apostolos & Oikonomou, Maria G. & Vlahogianni, Eleni I. & Yannis, George, 2021. "Quantifying the implementation impacts of a point to point automated urban shuttle service in a large-scale network," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 233-244.
    7. Simin Hesami & Majid Vafaeipour & Cedric De Cauwer & Evy Rombaut & Lieselot Vanhaverbeke & Thierry Coosemans, 2023. "Dynamic Pro-Active Eco-Driving Control Framework for Energy-Efficient Autonomous Electric Mobility," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-19, September.
    8. Andrea Papu Carrone & Jeppe Rich & Christian Anker Vandet & Kun An, 2021. "Autonomous vehicles in mixed motorway traffic: capacity utilisation, impact and policy implications," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(6), pages 2907-2938, December.
    9. Tordeux, Antoine & Lassarre, Sylvain & Roussignol, Michel, 2010. "An adaptive time gap car-following model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(8-9), pages 1115-1131, September.
    10. Blanch Micó, Mª Teresa & Lucas Alba, Antonio & Bellés Rivera, Teresa & Ferruz Gracia, Ana Mª & Melchor Galán, Óscar M. & Delgado Pastor, Luis C. & Ruíz Jiménez, Francisco & Chóliz Montañés, Mariano, 2018. "Car following: Comparing distance-oriented vs. inertia-oriented driving techniques," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 13-22.
    11. Pan, Wei & Xue, Yu & He, Hong-Di & Lu, Wei-Zhen, 2018. "Impacts of traffic congestion on fuel rate, dissipation and particle emission in a single lane based on Nasch Model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 503(C), pages 154-162.
    12. Tian, Junfang & Li, Guangyu & Treiber, Martin & Jiang, Rui & Jia, Ning & Ma, Shoufeng, 2016. "Cellular automaton model simulating spatiotemporal patterns, phase transitions and concave growth pattern of oscillations in traffic flow," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 560-575.
    13. Tian, Junfang & Treiber, Martin & Ma, Shoufeng & Jia, Bin & Zhang, Wenyi, 2015. "Microscopic driving theory with oscillatory congested states: Model and empirical verification," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 138-157.
    14. Saifuzzaman, Mohammad & Zheng, Zuduo & Haque, Md. Mazharul & Washington, Simon, 2017. "Understanding the mechanism of traffic hysteresis and traffic oscillations through the change in task difficulty level," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 523-538.
    15. Mathew, Tom V. & Ravishankar, K.V.R., 2012. "Neural network based vehicle-following model for mixed traffic conditions," European Transport \ Trasporti Europei, ISTIEE, Institute for the Study of Transport within the European Economic Integration, issue 52, pages 1-4.
    16. Tang, Tie-Qiao & Yi, Zhi-Yan & Zhang, Jian & Wang, Tao & Leng, Jun-Qiang, 2018. "A speed guidance strategy for multiple signalized intersections based on car-following model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 496(C), pages 399-409.
    17. Jinhua Tan & Li Gong & Xuqian Qin, 2019. "Global Optimality under Internet of Vehicles: Strategy to Improve Traffic Safety and Reduce Energy Dissipation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-16, August.
    18. Kanagaraj, Venkatesan & Treiber, Martin, 2018. "Self-driven particle model for mixed traffic and other disordered flows," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 509(C), pages 1-11.
    19. Jiang, Rui & Hu, Mao-Bin & Zhang, H.M. & Gao, Zi-You & Jia, Bin & Wu, Qing-Song, 2015. "On some experimental features of car-following behavior and how to model them," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 338-354.
    20. Maiti, Nandan & Chilukuri, Bhargava Rama, 2023. "Does anisotropy hold in mixed traffic conditions?," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 632(P1).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:633:y:2024:i:c:s0378437123009743. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/physica-a-statistical-mechpplications/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.