IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v71y2015icp138-157.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Microscopic driving theory with oscillatory congested states: Model and empirical verification

Author

Listed:
  • Tian, Junfang
  • Treiber, Martin
  • Ma, Shoufeng
  • Jia, Bin
  • Zhang, Wenyi

Abstract

The essential distinction between the Fundamental Diagram Approach (FDA) and Kerner’s three-phase theory (KTPT) is the existence of a unique gap–speed (or flow–density) relationship in the former class. In order to verify this relationship, empirical data are analyzed with the following findings: (1) linear relationship between the actual space gap and speed can be identified when the speed difference between vehicles approximates zero; (2) vehicles accelerate or decelerate around the desired space gap most of the time. To explain these phenomena, we propose that, in congested traffic flow, the space gap between two vehicles will oscillate around the desired space gap in the deterministic limit. This assumption is formulated in terms of a cellular automaton. In contrast to FDA and KTPT, the new model does not have any congested steady-state solution. Simulations under periodic and open boundary conditions reproduce the empirical findings of KTPT. Calibrating and validating the model to detector data produces results that are better than that of previous studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Tian, Junfang & Treiber, Martin & Ma, Shoufeng & Jia, Bin & Zhang, Wenyi, 2015. "Microscopic driving theory with oscillatory congested states: Model and empirical verification," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 138-157.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:71:y:2015:i:c:p:138-157
    DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2014.11.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191261514001921
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.trb.2014.11.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wu, Xinkai & Liu, Henry X. & Geroliminis, Nikolas, 2011. "An empirical analysis on the arterial fundamental diagram," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 255-266, January.
    2. D. Helbing & M. Treiber & A. Kesting & M. Schönhof, 2009. "Theoretical vs. empirical classification and prediction of congested traffic states," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 69(4), pages 583-598, June.
    3. Paul I. Richards, 1956. "Shock Waves on the Highway," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 4(1), pages 42-51, February.
    4. Gipps, P.G., 1981. "A behavioural car-following model for computer simulation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 105-111, April.
    5. Geroliminis, Nikolas & Daganzo, Carlos F., 2008. "Existence of urban-scale macroscopic fundamental diagrams: Some experimental findings," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(9), pages 759-770, November.
    6. Rehborn, Hubert & Klenov, Sergey L. & Palmer, Jochen, 2011. "An empirical study of common traffic congestion features based on traffic data measured in the USA, the UK, and Germany," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 390(23), pages 4466-4485.
    7. Kerner, Boris S., 2013. "Criticism of generally accepted fundamentals and methodologies of traffic and transportation theory: A brief review," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(21), pages 5261-5282.
    8. Robert Herman & Elliott W. Montroll & Renfrey B. Potts & Richard W. Rothery, 1959. "Traffic Dynamics: Analysis of Stability in Car Following," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 7(1), pages 86-106, February.
    9. P. Wagner, 2006. "How human drivers control their vehicle," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 52(3), pages 427-431, August.
    10. Daganzo, Carlos F., 1994. "The cell transmission model: A dynamic representation of highway traffic consistent with the hydrodynamic theory," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 269-287, August.
    11. Tian, Jun-fang & Jia, Bin & Li, Xin-gang & Jiang, Rui & Zhao, Xiao-mei & Gao, Zi-you, 2009. "Synchronized traffic flow simulating with cellular automata model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 388(23), pages 4827-4837.
    12. Gao, Kun & Jiang, Rui & Wang, Bing-Hong & Wu, Qing-Song, 2009. "Discontinuous transition from free flow to synchronized flow induced by short-range interaction between vehicles in a three-phase traffic flow model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 388(15), pages 3233-3243.
    13. R. Jiang & Q-S. Wu, 2005. "First order phase transition from free flow to synchronized flow in a cellular automata model," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 46(4), pages 581-584, August.
    14. He, Shuyan & Guan, Wei & Song, Liying, 2010. "Explaining traffic patterns at on-ramp vicinity by a driver perception model in the framework of three-phase traffic theory," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(4), pages 825-836.
    15. Treiber, Martin & Kesting, Arne & Helbing, Dirk, 2010. "Three-phase traffic theory and two-phase models with a fundamental diagram in the light of empirical stylized facts," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(8-9), pages 983-1000, September.
    16. Newell, G. F., 2002. "A simplified car-following theory: a lower order model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 195-205, March.
    17. Wagner, Peter, 2012. "Analyzing fluctuations in car-following," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(10), pages 1384-1392.
    18. Tian, Jun-fang & Yuan, Zhen-zhou & Treiber, Martin & Jia, Bin & Zhang, Wen-yi, 2012. "Cellular automaton model within the fundamental-diagram approach reproducing some findings of the three-phase theory," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 391(11), pages 3129-3139.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tian, Junfang & Li, Guangyu & Treiber, Martin & Jiang, Rui & Jia, Ning & Ma, Shoufeng, 2016. "Cellular automaton model simulating spatiotemporal patterns, phase transitions and concave growth pattern of oscillations in traffic flow," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 560-575.
    2. Rehborn, Hubert & Klenov, Sergey L. & Palmer, Jochen, 2011. "An empirical study of common traffic congestion features based on traffic data measured in the USA, the UK, and Germany," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 390(23), pages 4466-4485.
    3. Jiang, Rui & Hu, Mao-Bin & Zhang, H.M. & Gao, Zi-You & Jia, Bin & Wu, Qing-Song, 2015. "On some experimental features of car-following behavior and how to model them," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 338-354.
    4. Cheng, Qixiu & Liu, Zhiyuan & Lin, Yuqian & Zhou, Xuesong (Simon), 2021. "An s-shaped three-parameter (S3) traffic stream model with consistent car following relationship," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 246-271.
    5. Kai Nagel & Peter Wagner & Richard Woesler, 2003. "Still Flowing: Approaches to Traffic Flow and Traffic Jam Modeling," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(5), pages 681-710, October.
    6. Zhou, Fang & Li, Xiaopeng & Ma, Jiaqi, 2017. "Parsimonious shooting heuristic for trajectory design of connected automated traffic part I: Theoretical analysis with generalized time geography," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 394-420.
    7. Gao, Yang & Levinson, David, 2024. "A multi-stage spatial queueing model with logistic arrivals and departures consistent with the microscopic fundamental diagram and hysteresis," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    8. Jiang, Chenming & Bhat, Chandra R. & Lam, William H.K., 2020. "A bibliometric overview of Transportation Research Part B: Methodological in the past forty years (1979–2019)," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 268-291.
    9. Tian, Junfang & Zhu, Chenqiang & Chen, Danjue & Jiang, Rui & Wang, Guanying & Gao, Ziyou, 2021. "Car following behavioral stochasticity analysis and modeling: Perspective from wave travel time," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 160-176.
    10. Yeo, Hwasoo, 2008. "Asymmetric Microscopic Driving Behavior Theory," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt1tn1m968, University of California Transportation Center.
    11. Junfang Tian & Bin Jia & Shoufeng Ma & Chenqiang Zhu & Rui Jiang & YaoXian Ding, 2017. "Cellular Automaton Model with Dynamical 2D Speed-Gap Relation," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(3), pages 807-822, August.
    12. Paipuri, Mahendra & Leclercq, Ludovic, 2020. "Bi-modal macroscopic traffic dynamics in a single region," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 257-290.
    13. Mohammadian, Saeed & Zheng, Zuduo & Haque, Md. Mazharul & Bhaskar, Ashish, 2021. "Performance of continuum models for realworld traffic flows: Comprehensive benchmarking," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 132-167.
    14. Li, Xiaopeng & Ouyang, Yanfeng, 2011. "Characterization of traffic oscillation propagation under nonlinear car-following laws," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(9), pages 1346-1361.
    15. Tian, Junfang & Jiang, Rui & Jia, Bin & Gao, Ziyou & Ma, Shoufeng, 2016. "Empirical analysis and simulation of the concave growth pattern of traffic oscillations," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 338-354.
    16. Huanping Li & Jian Wang & Guopeng Bai & Xiaowei Hu, 2021. "Exploring the Distribution of Traffic Flow for Shared Human and Autonomous Vehicle Roads," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-21, June.
    17. Georgia Perakis & Guillaume Roels, 2006. "An Analytical Model for Traffic Delays and the Dynamic User Equilibrium Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(6), pages 1151-1171, December.
    18. He, Zhengbing & Zheng, Liang & Guan, Wei, 2015. "A simple nonparametric car-following model driven by field data," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 185-201.
    19. Yin, Ruyang & Zheng, Nan & Liu, Zhiyuan, 2022. "Estimating fundamental diagram for multi-modal signalized urban links with limited probe data," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 606(C).
    20. Treiber, Martin & Kesting, Arne, 2011. "Evidence of convective instability in congested traffic flow: A systematic empirical and theoretical investigation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(9), pages 1362-1377.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:71:y:2015:i:c:p:138-157. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.