IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/pacfin/v55y2019icp283-298.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

CSR activities and internal capital markets: Evidence from Korean business groups

Author

Listed:
  • Choi, Yoon K.
  • Han, Seung Hun
  • Kwon, Yonghyun

Abstract

This study examines the effect of business group structures on corporate social responsibility (CSR) performance of Korean firms. We find that the chaebol affiliation is, on average, positively related to CSR performance. We attribute this phenomenon to two main elements—CSR corporate foundations (or headquarters) and a spillover effect within the chaebol business group. Conversely, family control is found to be negatively associated with CSR performance. Furthermore, we find a positive relation between CSR performance and the firm value measured by Tobin's Q. Our results suggest that CSR headquarters seem to play an important role in improving CSR performance through the efficient allocation of internal resources. Finally, the group-level financial donations, an important CSR activity, seem to have a spillover effect on CSR performance within the business group. This result is consistent with internal capital markets being efficiently utilized by Korean business groups.

Suggested Citation

  • Choi, Yoon K. & Han, Seung Hun & Kwon, Yonghyun, 2019. "CSR activities and internal capital markets: Evidence from Korean business groups," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 283-298.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:pacfin:v:55:y:2019:i:c:p:283-298
    DOI: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2019.04.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927538X18304906
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.pacfin.2019.04.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mengdie Hai & Ziwei Fang & Zhaohua Li, 2022. "Does Business Group’s Conscious of Social Responsibility Enhance its Investment Efficiency? Evidence from ESG Disclosure of China’s Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-18, April.
    2. E. Jeroh, 2020. "Firms Attributes, Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure and the Financial Performance of Listed Companies in Nigeria," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 10(6), pages 727-743, June.
    3. Artur F. Tomeczek, 2023. "The rise of the chaebol: A bibliometric analysis of business groups in South Korea," Papers 2306.08743, arXiv.org.
    4. Shobha Tewari & Bibek Bhattacharya, 2023. "Financial resources, corporate social responsibility, and ownership type: Evidence from India," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 40(3), pages 1093-1132, September.
    5. Christoph Stock & Laura Pütz & Sabrina Schell & Arndt Werner, 2024. "Corporate Social Responsibility in Family Firms: Status and Future Directions of a Research Field," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 190(1), pages 199-259, February.
    6. Mun, Seongjae & Han, Seung Hun & Seo, Dongwook, 2020. "The impact of CEO educational background on corporate cash holdings and value of excess cash," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    7. Wu, Wuqing & Peng, Fei & Shan, Yuan George & Jie, Xiaoxiao, 2020. "Signaling through corporate philanthropy," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    8. Rumeng Cui & Zhong Ma & Longfeng Wang, 2022. "Allocation of Decision Rights and CSR Disclosure: Evidence from Listed Business Groups in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-20, March.
    9. Yonghyun Kwon & Seung Hun Han & Young Woo Koh, 2022. "Production Suspension, Corporate Governance, and Firm Value," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(10), pages 2711-2735, August.
    10. Byungjun Yu & Saixing Zeng & Hongquan Chen & Xiaohua Meng & Chiming Tam, 2021. "Doing more and doing better are two different entities: Different patterns of family control and environmental performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 1-20, January.
    11. Leonidou, Leonidas C. & Eteokleous, Pantelitsa P. & Christodoulides, Paul & Strømfeldt Eduardsen, Jonas, 2023. "A dynamic capabilities perspective to socially responsible family business: Implications on social-based advantage and market performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(PA).
    12. Olena Liakh & Francesca Spigarelli, 2020. "Managing Corporate Sustainability and Responsibility Efficiently: A Review of Existing Literature on Business Groups and Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-42, September.
    13. Qiang Xu & Lian Xu & Zaiyang Xie & Mufan Jin, 2021. "Does Business Group Matter for the Relationship between Green Innovation and Financial Performance? Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-16, November.
    14. Won-Yong Oh & Hojae Ree & Young Kyun Chang & Igor Postuła, 2023. "Trees in the Forest: How Do Family Owners Make CSR Decisions in Business Groups?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 187(4), pages 759-780, November.
    15. Marashdeh, Hazem & Dhiaf, Mohamed M. & Atayah, Osama F. & Nasrallah, Nohade & Frederico, Guilherme F. & Najaf, Khakan, 2023. "Sensitivity of market performance to social risk index: Evidence from global listed companies in logistics and transportation industry," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(PA).
    16. Maoliang Bu & Ying Liu, 2022. "Multinational Enterprises’ Dual Agency Role: Formal Institutions and Corporate Social Responsibility in Emerging Markets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-22, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Business group; Financial donations; Internal capital market; Corporate social responsibility;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill
    • G34 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Mergers; Acquisitions; Restructuring; Corporate Governance
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:pacfin:v:55:y:2019:i:c:p:283-298. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/pacfin .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.