IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can citizen science contribute to the evidence-base that underpins marine policy?


  • Hyder, Kieran
  • Townhill, Bryony
  • Anderson, Lucy G.
  • Delany, Jane
  • Pinnegar, John K.


Marine legislation is becoming ever more complex, so new cost-effective ways of obtaining and processing increasingly large data sets are required to support evidence-based policy making. Citizen science is one solution, but the uptake of the evidence generated by citizens among policy makers is often limited. Here, the importance of citizen science in delivery of the evidence-base that underpins marine policy was assessed using a series of case-studies. There was no consistent rationale for developing policy-relevant citizen science, but drivers included: lack of existing data, difficulty in collecting data by other means, the use of citizen science data by other organisations, and the capabilities of volunteers. Challenges to the uptake of marine citizen science were identified from policy-maker, scientist and citizen perspectives, and these related to data quality, data access, motivation of volunteers, and physical location. Citizen science has good potential to contribute to the evidence-base alongside traditional monitoring, remote sensing, and modelling, but only if outputs from citizen science projects are judged individually on quality. If this is the case, citizen science has an important role in delivery and understanding of future marine policy, but is only one part of an integrated solution.

Suggested Citation

  • Hyder, Kieran & Townhill, Bryony & Anderson, Lucy G. & Delany, Jane & Pinnegar, John K., 2015. "Can citizen science contribute to the evidence-base that underpins marine policy?," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 112-120.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:59:y:2015:i:c:p:112-120
    DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2015.04.022

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL:
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Levrel, Harold & Fontaine, Benoît & Henry, Pierre-Yves & Jiguet, Frédéric & Julliard, Romain & Kerbiriou, Christian & Couvet, Denis, 2010. "Balancing state and volunteer investment in biodiversity monitoring for the implementation of CBD indicators: A French example," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(7), pages 1580-1586, May.
    2. Mackinson, S. & Wilson, D.C. & Galiay, P. & Deas, B., 2011. "Engaging stakeholders in fisheries and marine research," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 18-24, January.
    3. McKinley, Duncan C. & Briggs, Russell D. & Bartuska, Ann M., 2012. "When peer-reviewed publications are not enough! Delivering science for natural resource management," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 1-11.
    4. Glenn, Helen & Tingley, Diana & Sánchez Maroño, Sonia & Holm, Dennis & Kell, Laurence & Padda, Gurpreet & Runar Edvardsson, Ingi & Asmundsson, Johann & Conides, Alexis & Kapiris, Kostas & Bezabih, Min, 2012. "Trust in the fisheries scientific community," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 54-72, January.
    5. Harold Levrel & Benoit Fontaine & Pierre-Yves Henry & Frédéric Jiguet & Romain Julliard & Christian Kerbiriou & Denis Couvet, 2010. "Balancing state and volunteer investment in biodiversity monitoring for the implementation of CBD indicators: A French example," Post-Print hal-00511660, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Bruno Hay Mele & Luca Russo & Domenico D’Alelio, 2019. "Combining Marine Ecology and Economy to Roadmap the Integrated Coastal Management: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-21, August.
    2. Pikesley, Stephen K. & Godley, Brendan J. & Latham, Holly & Richardson, Peter B. & Robson, Laura M. & Solandt, Jean-Luc & Trundle, Colin & Wood, Chris & Witt, Matthew J., 2016. "Pink sea fans (Eunicella verrucosa) as indicators of the spatial efficacy of Marine Protected Areas in southwest UK coastal waters," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 38-45.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ortega, Jason A. & Park, Chul Hyun, 2022. "The benefit and cost of voluntary work in government: The case of the United States Coast Guard Auxiliary Boat Crew Program," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    2. Bhattacharya, Tania Ray & Managi, Shunsuke, 2012. "Contributions of the private sector to global biodiversity protection: case study of the fortune 500 companies," MPRA Paper 39949, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Martin, Jean-Christophe & Mongruel, Rémi & Levrel, Harold, 2018. "Integrating Cultural Ecosystem Services in an Ecosystem Satellite Account: A Case Study in the Gulf of Saint-Malo (France)," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 141-152.
    4. Stevanov, Mirjana & Böcher, Michael & Krott, Max & Krajter, Silvija & Vuletic, Dijana & Orlovic, Sasa, 2013. "The Research, Integration and Utilization (RIU) model as an analytical framework for the professionalization of departmental research organizations: Case studies of publicly funded forest research ins," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 20-28.
    5. Ualerson Iran Peixoto & Morgan Casal-Ribeiro & Wendell M. Medeiros-Leal & Ana Novoa-Pabon & Mário Pinho & Régis Santos, 2022. "Scientific and Fisher’s Knowledge-Based Ecological Risk Assessment: Combining Approaches to Determine the Vulnerability of Fisheries Stocks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-18, November.
    6. Paul R Armsworth & Lisette Cantú-Salazar & Mark Parnell & Josephine E Booth & Rob Stoneman & Zoe G Davies, 2013. "Opportunities for Cost-Sharing in Conservation: Variation in Volunteering Effort across Protected Areas," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(1), pages 1-7, January.
    7. Hilaire Drouineau & Marie Vanacker & Estibaliz Diaz & Maria Mateo & Maria Korta & Carlos Antunes & Carlos Fernández Delgado & Isabel Domingos & Lluis Zamora & Laurent Beaulaton & Patrick Lambert & Céd, 2021. "Incorporating Stakeholder Knowledge into a Complex Stock Assessment Model: The Case of Eel Recruitment," Post-Print hal-03206805, HAL.
    8. Brenda Parlee & Henry Huntington & Fikret Berkes & Trevor Lantz & Leon Andrew & Joseph Tsannie & Cleo Reece & Corinne Porter & Vera Nicholson & Sharon Peter & Deb Simmons & Herman Michell & Melody Lep, 2021. "One-Size Does Not Fit All—A Networked Approach to Community-Based Monitoring in Large River Basins," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-30, July.
    9. Tim S. Gray & Thomas L. Catchpole, 2021. "The Relation between Fisheries–Science Partnerships and Co-Management: A Case Study of EU Discards Survival Work," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-19, March.
    10. Alabsi, Natheer & Komatsu, Teruhisa, 2014. "Characterization of fisheries management in Yemen: A case study of a developing country׳s management regime," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(PA), pages 89-95.
    11. Valentina Tudisca, 2016. "(English) Report about communication between researchers and stakeholders: a case study in the agrifood sector (Italiano) Rapporto sulla comunicazione tra ricercatori e stakeholder: un caso di studio ," IRPPS Working Papers 87:2016, National Research Council, Institute for Research on Population and Social Policies.
    12. Schröter, Barbara & Matzdorf, Bettina & Sattler, Claudia & Garcia Alarcon, Gisele, 2015. "Intermediaries to foster the implementation of innovative land management practice for ecosystem service provision – A new role for researchers," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 16(C), pages 192-200.
    13. Inês Pereira & Ualerson Iran Peixoto & Wendell Medeiros-Leal & Morgan Casal-Ribeiro & Régis Santos, 2022. "Multidimensional Indicators to Assess the Sustainability of Demersal Small-Scale Fishery in the Azores," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-19, December.
    14. Livia Fritz & Claudia R. Binder, 2018. "Participation as Relational Space: A Critical Approach to Analysing Participation in Sustainability Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-29, August.
    15. Grant Murray & Carleigh Randall & Rick Rollins, 2020. "Informing Protected Area Decision Making through Academic-Practitioner Collaborations," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-15, October.
    16. Dentoni, Domenico & Klerkx, Laurens, 2015. "Co-managing public research in Australian fisheries through convergence–divergence processes," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 259-271.
    17. Santiago, Jose L. & Ballesteros, Marta A. & Chapela, Rosa & Silva, Cristina & Nielsen, Kåre N. & Rangel, Mafalda & Erzini, Karim & Wise, Laura & Campos, Aida & Borges, Maria F. & Sala, Antonello & Vir, 2015. "Is Europe ready for a results-based approach to fisheries management? The voice of stakeholders," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 86-97.
    18. Melaku Canu, Donata & Solidoro, Cosimo, 2014. "Socio-economic analysis and stakeholder involvement: Mussel-farming in the Gulf of Trieste," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 55-62.
    19. Hickey, Gordon M., 2013. "International developments in the administration of publicly-funded forest research: A review," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 1-8.
    20. Jessica L Couture & Rachael E Blake & Gavin McDonald & Colette L Ward, 2018. "A funder-imposed data publication requirement seldom inspired data sharing," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(7), pages 1-13, July.


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:59:y:2015:i:c:p:112-120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: . General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.